Jump to content

O'S may return to the GG defense of the 70's


wildcard

Recommended Posts

I think the defense improved the last two months of last year as well as the pitching. They were trying to impress Buck. Then the O's put Reynolds at 3B and Scott in LF this year which showed a different focus.

So you're saying that the Orioles don't really try most of the time. They just have it on cruise control, giving minimal effort, not really caring about winning or losing or their next contract. But when Buck came in they flipped a switch and suddenly they were a .600 team. It's not about talent, it's finding someone who can motivate. The only difference between a 60-win team and a 90-win team is finding someone who can light a fire under their butts.

Even if I'm exaggerating your position a bit, I couldn't disagree more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If the players were trying to impress Buck, and thats why we were so good last year under his tenure, than I am more disappointed in the team than ever. That means they have the ability to go out and compete everyday and willingly chose not to.

The implication is that the Orioles are a team that just doesn't care. At all. In fact, wildcard is saying that the Orioles, as a team, believe winning just isn't worth the effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the players were trying to impress Buck, and thats why we were so good last year under his tenure, than I am more disappointed in the team than ever. That means they have the ability to go out and compete everyday and willingly chose not to.

It might be easier than we think to just come to work and exist when you're on a bad baseball team and 30 games out of first place. The prospect of getting to the playoffs has to be a huge motivation factor that helps players on good teams stay focused and keep the intensity level up. An analogy that comes to mind is commissioned salespeople vs. non-commissioned. Non-commissioned salespeople are just fine, make their quotas, etc. But commissioned salespeople have more skin in the game and can be absolutely ravenous about getting that next sale. It's the difference between "I'll be with you in a minute after I'm done on the phone with my girlfriend" and meeting the customer at the door. The employer can get an Orioles-type return from their sales staff, or they can provide the motivation to get a Yankees-type return from their staff.

Buck showed up late last season and gave the guys a reason to get the intensity level up, providing the sort of motivation that's normally gone after the first quarter of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might be easier than you think to just come to work and exist when you're on a bad baseball team and 30 games out of first place. The prospect of getting to the playoffs has to be a huge motivation factor that helps players on good teams stay focused and keep the intensity level up. An analogy that comes to mind is commissioned salespeople vs. non-commissioned. Non-commissioned salespeople are just fine, make their quotas, etc. But commissioned salespeople have more skin in the game and can be absolutely ravenous about getting that next sale. It's the difference between "I'll be with you in a minute after I'm done on the phone with my girlfriend" and meeting the customer at the door. The employer can get an Orioles-type return from their sales staff, or they can provide the motivation to get a Yankees-type return from their staff.

Buck showed up late last season and gave the guys a reason to get the intensity level up, providing the sort of motivation that's normally gone after the first quarter of the season.

Well I do believe that the team doesn't really care for the most part. But I am pointing out the obvious counter to a statement like "they wanted to impress Buck." The other side of that coin is that other than that time period they don't give a rat's behind, which is something I don't think WC would endorse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might be easier than we think to just come to work and exist when you're on a bad baseball team and 30 games out of first place. The prospect of getting to the playoffs has to be a huge motivation factor that helps players on good teams stay focused and keep the intensity level up. An analogy that comes to mind is commissioned salespeople vs. non-commissioned. Non-commissioned salespeople are just fine, make their quotas, etc. But commissioned salespeople have more skin in the game and can be absolutely ravenous about getting that next sale. It's the difference between "I'll be with you in a minute after I'm done on the phone with my girlfriend" and meeting the customer at the door. The employer can get an Orioles-type return from their sales staff, or they can provide the motivation to get a Yankees-type return from their staff.

Buck showed up late last season and gave the guys a reason to get the intensity level up, providing the sort of motivation that's normally gone after the first quarter of the season.

I'm not sure you can compare salespeople to major league baseball players. MLB players are a kind of unique group, already downselected through about 15 highly competitive steps from little league to Legion ball to high school to travel teams to college to five or six rungs of the minors. They're the most motivated, talented, hard working 0.001% of the baseball playing population. Even with someone of Adam Jones' talent, if he just put it on cruise control he'd have not made it out of AA.

This is why I've always been highly skeptical of the concept of clutch hitting. They can't dial it up to 10 in clutch situations because they've long since pegged the dial at 10 just to get to the majors.

I will continue to believe that the vast majority of major leaguers are giving what they think is their best effort the vast majority of the time, until someone proves otherwise to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is my observation that pitching and defense have a somewhat symbiotic relationship. Fielders are more alert when the pitchers are working quickly and throwing strikes. Pitchers work faster and throw more strikes when they have confidence that their fielders will make plays. I do think the fielding was a little better while Buck was here last year compared to the previous 4 months, for two reasons: (1) better pitching led to more alert defense, and (2) BRob was back at 2B. I still say 90% of the reason the Orioles had such a good record under Buck last year was because of the pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...