Jump to content

Markakis has surgery


wellsk86

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Surgery is never the first option. Despite modern medicine it is not the safest or least costly option for most injuries. He was probably told to rest it and go from there. It was still hurting and they found further injury on a mote evasive exam or determined surgery was the last best option.

I'm never going to fault a player over health decisions and I am certainly not going to double guess the sports medicine doctors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With one of your more important and most expensive players, not fully diagnosing an injury is inexcusable. This could have been nipped months ago. Our handling and susceptibility to injuries should raise some questions in new management's meetings about the team's medical approach.

It's not that the injury is different than it was originally. It was fully diagnosed. With MOST injuries there are two different courses of treatment, with this one there was probably something like a 70-80% chance it healed on it's own. Anything above 50% you want to give a shot to heal, there could be much worse complications from him having surgery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is true, but with an important and expensive player like Markakis I just wish they would have gotten multiple opinions. And even if those opinions were all rest, why did they wait 3 months before deciding to investigate further?

I promise this isn't the first time they've checked on him. I'm sure he's had multiple appointments with the doctors handling things, and this is just the point they decided if they hadn't seen enough improvement they'd schedule surgery. He's already HAD the surgery, and with the holidays just being over I'm sure they put it off a few weeks to get through those first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the line from the Sun article. It sounds to me like it wasn't a case of choosing rehab over surgery, but of an initial misdiagnosis without ever having an MRI to confirm.

He said he had rested this offseason and felt like he was improving, but when he wasn't fully healed, he was sent to a specialist. An MRI revealed the damage to the abdomen.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the line from the Sun article. It sounds to me like it wasn't a case of choosing rehab over surgery, but of an initial misdiagnosis without ever having an MRI to confirm.

That's an awful lot of jumping to conclusions from a one-sentence blurb from the Sun. I'm pretty sure I remember him getting an MRI after he first had the injury. That line just as easily says that they were letting it heal, and he went to have another MRI done to check on it since it wasn't fully healed yet which showed it wasn't fully recovered.

It's not like they just suddenly noticed there was damage in there during this MRI, they already knew there was damage in there. This was just the follow up MRI to see how the progress was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it? The initial diagnosis was "bone bruise". A later MRI showed a torn muscle. How is that jumping to conclusions?

The "initial" injury was from sliding into a base on a steal, and then a couple days later he dove for a ball in the OF and had the bad abdomen pain. I don't know how long he played through it but I remember them talking about it at the end of the season. I'm pretty sure that muscle was torn during the playing through it part and not the original slide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...