Jump to content

Latest on Bedard/ESPN/ESPN Blog


Jimmy Mad

Recommended Posts

A couple O's tidbits:

11:25 a.m., from Amy Nelson

• The Orioles and Dodgers met last night and discussed Miguel Tejada, according to two baseball sources. But according to one source, the match between the two teams did not appear to be there. Tejada has let it be known that he is only willing to move to third base if he goes to a contending team.

• Teams inquiring about Erik Bedard have been told that it's going to take a superior package of prospects, and the Orioles are telling clubs they already have four teams with very promising packages.

ESPN WM blog

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

From Heyman (CNNSI)

The Phillies, Yankees, Red Sox and Blue Jays were also thought to have interest, but Baltimore owner Peter Angelos had told people he has no intention of trading Bedard within the division, meaning the Yankees, Red Sox and Blue Jays can probably forget it.

Angelos is meddling

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would the met's offer qualify as "promising" if we have already rejected it?

WEll, apparently we rejected the offer they gave us at the GM meetings.

Rumors are out that they have added pieces to their offer. I'm sure that the Mets are one of the teams AM is mentioning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Heyman (CNNSI)

Angelos is meddling

Yeah and while they would probably never do that it's not like you can't play them against other teams driving up the price for our players in trade. Good job PA, you probably just cost us another good player or four!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Heyman (CNNSI)

Angelos is meddling

Maybe a little, but honestly can you blame him? Most teams are very hesitant to trade in their division and I personally do not want to have to face Bedard 6-7 times a year. If the packages are similar then the smart thing to do is to trade him to the NL. Now if the Sox or Yankees were to offer their Santana packages than that might change my view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah and while they would probably never do that it's not like you can't play them against other teams driving up the price for our players in trade. Good job PA, you probably just cost us another good player or four!!

There is more than enough competition to drive up Bedard's value, something like 9 teams are reported as being interested. Take away 3 and you still have 6 with 4 being reported as having promising packages.

If the any of three division teams totally blow us away I am sure AM will listen, but if the offers are comperable than the wise thing to do is trade him to the NL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe a little, but honestly can you blame him? Most teams are very hesitant to trade in their division and I personally do not want to have to face Bedard 6-7 times a year. If the packages are similar then the smart thing to do is to trade him to the NL. Now if the Sox or Yankees were to offer their Santana packages than that might change my view.

Yes, we should blame him. He should not be talking to other teams about trades - period. And as was said, that stupid comment could hurt the O's bargaining power. And it's really stupid to exclude the Sawx or Yankees. The reality is that we're not competing with them. Worrying about them is always going to be counterproductive and serve no positive purpose. Has the Yankees having Mussina affected the O's? No. And neither would them having Bedard. Refusing to trade with them is just biting your nose to spite your face. One of the O's best trades ever was with the Yankees - when we got McGregor, Tippy Martinez, Dempsey, and another useful player or 2 that I can't remember for basically I think Mike Torrez (sp?). It just doesn't make sense to limit your options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • You always need shuttle guys. Ideally, I would think they’d like to have 2-3 spots they can interchange between 5-6 guys. That allows them to maybe get some younger arms in there, like McDermott and the others we mentioned already.  Bautista, if he is back to his old form, Seranthony, Cano, Soto (who I think may just surprise some people), while Cionel and Akin are not sure things. Either could be moved. They should make some moves there, IMO. Cionel has not really improved as much as I had hoped. Akin has had a very good year. Are they ARB eligible this year?
    • You’re the one who threw Ripken into the discussion.  And I don’t think anyone is necessarily saying that Gunnar will be as good as Ripken.  Cal is 3rd all time in Total Zone Runs for a SS.  But, Cal also proves that you don’t judge a SS solely on how many errors they make.  The years that Cal made 26, 25 and 25 errors, he was +11, +23, +O Rtot.  And  Gunnar is playing a solid SS now by the advanced metrics.  
    • Coby's problem is not the SSS at bats, but rather his sample size on defense, both minors and majors. He has no position at this point in his career. He's a DH and not in the lineup today because AS is Dhing. Eloy is on the bench as well. Both are PH options so stay ready. 
    • I do not know if there were extenuating circumstances or not.  Could be it's a quieter locker room without the rest of the guys, which would make sense in a concussion situation.  So, maybe I did rush to an unfair conclusion here.  At the time, I felt like it more of a "spring training look" when the starters all leave the field after they're done playing.....so yes, there could be other very reasonable explanations. I'll stand corrected, and retract my conclusion.
    • Message to Coby.....you better learn how to use a glove.
    • Totally agree.  And at no point will some people be able to admit that the shiny, new rookie may be overmatched, and putting him just because hangouters want him in there may not be the best move for team chemistry or results  People need to earn their way when given a chance, and with where we are in the standings, leashes are going to be short.  We're not the White Sox who can afford to play anyone they want because it doesn't matter.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...