Jump to content

Here's why today's loss SUCKED


Pedro Cerrano

Recommended Posts

Buck was out managed; he had several opportunities to put better hitters in and didnt. Leaving Chris Davis in to hit with runners on 2nd and 3rd is inexcusable. You need contact there, and Davis strikes out more than any other jitter available there.

The bullpen was out pitched. You can't serve up so many tack on runs to bad hitters.

Our situational hitting was horrible. If you don't score runs when you have the opportunity in the early innings then you let the other team think they can win it.

Arrieta is half way down the BW parkway. He is both not pitching well, and not getting innings. He's got to learn how to be productive even when he doesn't have his best stuff.

Really? This is one of the more absurd things I have read on here in a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
[sOSH Yesterday]Had a chance to win the game and go up 2-0 in the series against the Orioles.

We hold Hardy, Markakis, Jones, and Wieters, their only real players, to a handful of singles.

And we get beat by Wayne Tolleson's little kid and Wilson Freakin' Betemit.

We get two(!!!!!!) hits off of Brian "10.69 ERA" Matusz.

This was such a winnable game and we blew it. Sucks.

We cannot allow crap players on the eventual last-place team in the division beat us.[/sOSH]

What's your point or are you just being your typically sarcastic, snarky self?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a winnable game, but let's not pretend Boston didn't have other opportunities to score. They had 16 baserunners today, to our 15. Both team missed several opportunities.

I usually have a bad attitude when we lose close games to Boston but this series I felt different. The team was at the end of this 20 game stretch and running on fumes a little. The question will be how we play vs KC, we have a very tough 9 game road trip coming up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck was out managed; he had several opportunities to put better hitters in and didnt. Leaving Chris Davis in to hit with runners on 2nd and 3rd is inexcusable. You need contact there, and Davis strikes out more than any other jitter available there.

The bullpen was out pitched. You can't serve up so many tack on runs to bad hitters.

Our situational hitting was horrible. If you don't score runs when you have the opportunity in the early innings then you let the other team think they can win it.

Arrieta is half way down the BW parkway. He is both not pitching well, and not getting innings. He's got to learn how to be productive even when he doesn't have his best stuff.

Davis was 9 for his last 20 coming into today. Why would you pull him out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Losses happen. Teams get beat by folks who aren't all stars or future HOFers. Move on. Win the next one.

This. I'm not as down about losing one game as I am about Arrieta's inconsistency for 1/4 the year now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a winnable game, but let's not pretend Boston didn't have other opportunities to score. They had 16 baserunners today, to our 15. Both team missed several opportunities.

Exactly. We've had a really tough stretch of games and have won a lot of them. June doesn't get much easier.

Let's get rested up and go in strong to this series against KC, who can take you by surprise if you let them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Losses happen. Teams get beat by folks who aren't all stars or future HOFers. Move on. Win the next one.

True, but that doesn't mean I have to like it.

When you're the Orioles you need all the wins you can get and losing in this fashion, regardless as to what happened yesterday, is not something we can afford to be doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No manager is taking Davis out there. No way you pinch hit there.

You should. You don't need a HR. You need someone who will put the ball in play: hit, sac, groundout to second are all acceptable. Hell, GO's to second is all Wieters has been doing lately. Tho you can't pinch your backup C there I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a winnable game, but let's not pretend Boston didn't have other opportunities to score. They had 16 baserunners today, to our 15. Both team missed several opportunities.

Exactly. That they only got 4 off of Arrieta was practically a miracle. As has been said, this one was brutal, but it happens. They were bound to lose one like this sooner or later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should. You don't need a HR. You need someone who will put the ball in play: hit, sac, groundout to second are all acceptable. Hell, GO's to second is all Wieters has been doing lately. Tho you can't pinch your backup C there I guess.

So you are hitting who there? Tolleson? Davis has been hot lately, I know he has his weaknesses but I couldn't disagree more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but that doesn't mean I have to like it.

When you're the Orioles you need all the wins you can get and losing in this fashion, regardless as to what happened yesterday, is not something we can afford to be doing.

Nobody likes it, and no team can "afford" any losses. Always sucks to lose. But you have to move on, this is a long season and even the best teams have ugly losses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What bugs me is the automatic take on 3-0 and the automatic swing on 3-1. A lot of those 3-1 swings seem to be at borderline pitches. The kind you can't do much with. But they hack anyway. And the 3-0 pitches are almost always meatbals that they take anyway. Don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm unhappy we lost and it was frustrating, but the rest of this "you've got to do this" and "good teams do that" and blah, blah, blah is just emotional nonsense IMHO.

I'll admit to my share of emotional nonsense, but today's game had me in and out of the office with the radio so I didn't directly experience all the gory details. So I'm not as worked up as I could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...