Jump to content

Just a thought exercise. What would it take to trade for Harper?


Gurgi

Recommended Posts

Harper is an amazing talent. Perhaps once in a life time. And he is already playing in the Majors and looks not a bit intimidated.

So just to pass the time. What would it take to get him?

I am not suggesting we even try this. I was just throwing around how much it would take to get such a talent. Which might be a Ken Griffey Jr. Or an ARod.

Do we have enough? Some think Bundy is the number one prospect and Machado number three.

Obviously Dylan Bundy is a great prospect but straight up he cant swing Harper. Would Bundy, Machado swing harper? Would Bundy, Machado, Strop get you Harper?

What would get you him? Bundy, Machado and Britton?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think it would take Bundy,Markakis,Machado,Strop.

I think you would be laughed at. Harper is simply not a guy any team would trade. He is a guy that if he stays healthy will be all over the record books in 20 years.

Maybe if you add AJ and another ML pitcher. In other words you can't get it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're looking at an All-Star, solid regular, top prospect, and lesser prospect:

Jones

Markakis/Britton(?)

Bundy/Machado

Schoop

This is one of those rare times where I don't think a trade like this would benefit either team, to be honest though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being the in-house die hard Nats fan:) I gotta say, why? He was tweeting in the off-season about his love of the Yankees. Sickening. Why would you want to have a kid like that? He is probably going to leave at free agency anyways. No thanks. I would rather have Adam Jones any day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking Wieters, Bundy and Machado. Jones does make sense given his position.

The only way this could ever happen is if we drastically overpaid in players AND probably agreed to up their MASN fees by a substantial amount. In that regard, we're probably the only team in baseball that could potentially pull this off in some other universe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on, that would just be stupid. When was the last time two contending teams made a trade of a superstar for fill in the blank. I could only see it if it was superstar for superstar, but one team had an excess at a certain position. He might be great the next 20 years, but the Nationals will only have him for the next 6. No way he doesn't try to test the FA waters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking Wieters, Bundy and Machado. Jones does make sense given his position.

The only way this could ever happen is if we drastically overpaid in players AND probably agreed to up their MASN fees by a substantial amount. In that regard, we're probably the only team in baseball that could potentially pull this off in some other universe.

Wouldn't it be awesome if Bundy came up, dominated like Strasburg, and we could pull of a trade of the value of Wieters, Bundy and Machado for Bundy. Not that any team would be dumb enough to trade that kind of talent for one guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Winning 2 more games looks like a long shot.  This team played over their heads for so long, I think they just ran out of gas.  Maybe we can get a couple more ace like starter performances or just play a Yankees/Blue Jays B squad.  Disappointing to finish the year this way, even though I never thought the O's would be near .500 this year.
    • But bringing in busts like Reed really hurt us bad.
    • I understand the complaints about the lineup but really the reason we came back down to earth is the bullpen.   We were close to automatic in games we were ahead of the 6th and in almost every game if the starter kept us close.    The bullpen regressed, wore out, whatever you want to say.   As a whole, the bullpen was great for most of the season.   If the bullpen doesn't go flat, we probably make the playoffs or the season goes down to the final couple of games.
    • Thanks for everything that you all do on the Hangout. I discovered it in 1999 and have been a loyal reader ever since. Not only is it the best baseball fan site, It is the best sports fan site around.    I haven’t posted in many years, but I haven’t been this excited about the Orioles in a very long time. Thanks again guys. 
    • Carrying the lineup, no.  Likely being one less glaring hole in the lineup?  Very possible.  Helping the team win more by not being close to an automatic out?  Probable.  I understand the left versus right arguments and the pitcher splits.  But I think it's been way over blown and relied upon way too much by whoever is making that decision, be it Hyde, Elias or whatever PC just spits out the lineup.  We've put inferior players in the lineup way to often this year... it's amazing we have won a many as we have really. 
    • Even if Aguilar is never on the team Stowers is not carrying the lineup vs LHP. They simply have not performed.    There is zero doubt in my mind that Hyde is not solely making decisions. 
    • They basically hung around 6-8 over .500 for awhile. 9 over after A’s series. Plus 7 after Jays series, 6 after Boston, 8 after DC, 7 after Jays, 6 after Detroit, 6 after Houston. Now it’s down to 4. In between never dipped below 5, never over 8 after A’s series.    I really want 3-3 the rest of way, 2-4 at minimum.  Would like 4-2. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...