Jump to content

vs. METS 6/20


garethcoker

Recommended Posts

I hear ya and I understand, I guess I'm just saying what I've been feeling all along this year. I've enjoyed the season, but the more I looked at our weaknesses (poor starting rotation, poor defense, below average offense) the more I kept waiting for them to start to lose more than they win. Now no one expected them to be this pitiful, and they aren't this bad, but I'll be happy if we somehow can not implode. I just want this team to end up over .500 this year. That's my goal for the season and anything more than that is cake.

.500 is all well and good, but I really have to wonder what the O's are going to do if they go off the rails for a stretch and fall out of contention. IMO, they really painted themselves into a corner with the Jones deal. While I like the idea of having AJ here long term, what on Earth can the FO say if, at the end of the year, it's clear that the reset button needs to be hit yet again? Or are they all of a sudden going to open up their wallets to buy established talent? As much as I like how the Hammel trade/Chen signing have turned out, things like that just...don't happen very often (in re: how well the bargain-basementing has turned out). And, taking for granted that, through the course of this season, Wieters firmly establishes that...he simply is what he is (i.e., great glove, middle-of-the-road bat), along with Markakis, Reynolds, etc...well, it doesn't seem as though the winter story will be that much different than the story that's played out every winter for the last 14 years. Gaping holes in the middle-of-the-order, along with OBP problems, and a dire need to fill (perhaps) up to three rotation spots.

I'm spent already...sheesh...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 280
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Frankly, I'm not nearly as worried about the bats (we've faced great pitching, I don't even know if you can call it a slump) as I am about how poor the gloves are, which implies lack of concentration: aside from the normal zombie show by Betemit, you've got Flaherty, Hardy, Roberts, Jones, and Nick Johnson all looking stiff or confused out there. The only defensive plus being Wieters' throw beating the SB-attempt by a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear ya and I understand, I guess I'm just saying what I've been feeling all along this year. I've enjoyed the season, but the more I looked at our weaknesses (poor starting rotation, poor defense, below average offense) the more I kept waiting for them to start to lose more than they win. Now no one expected them to be this pitiful, and they aren't this bad, but I'll be happy if we somehow can not implode. I just want this team to end up over .500 this year. That's my goal for the season and anything more than that is cake.

We are on the same page and I want to adjust my expectations accordingly, because I would have killed for that before the year.

As far as the offense goes, I still feel like they can be at least average and they have been thus far.

Now, that's assuming these scenarios

-B rob provides a boost (750ish OPS)

-Davis hits to an 800ish OPS

-Reynolds 800ish OPS

-Hardy duplicates near last years numbers

-Jones hits 35 HRs

-At this point, Wieters duplicating last year would look OK (disappointing after his hot start)

-Kakes comes back and hits .800 OPS

-Betemit gets near his career .780 OPS

I guess those have been my implicit hopes for the offense, and I don't think they are really unreasonable and that would make for an above average offense. (B rob looks like the biggest long shot right now)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly, I'm not nearly as worried about the bats (we've faced great pitching, I don't even know if you can call it a slump) as I am about how poor the gloves are, which implies lack of concentration: aside from the normal zombie show by Betemit, you've got Flaherty, Hardy, Roberts, Jones, and Nick Johnson all looking stiff or confused out there. The only defensive plus being Wieters' throw beating the SB-attempt by a lot.

No, getting shut-out three games in a row is a definite slump by any measure, regardless of how good the pitching is... But you are right about the gloves. Errors seem A-OK on this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2005 part deux...wonderful to be an O's fan!!!!

Really? Seems a bit premature to write them off based on a tough series on the road. Just my opinion. I do think they need to make some moves soon if they want to keep pace with the stankees .... Matusz Arrieta and Hunter in the rotation is not gonna get it done. They need a solid #3 at the very least

Sent from my Thrive using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • They all look like easy re-ups but if you do that than you do not have any spots available for an upgrade and the pen needs at least one upgrade.
    • Yates was very good in 2023 after returning from injury. In 2024 he was nearly as dominant as he was in 2019. He injured his arm in 2020 and missed all of 2021. I doubt he’s signing a 1 year deal. He’s a much better pitcher than either Soto or Dominquez. So the simple answer to your question is …..You can’t 
    • The splits for the second half definitely do kinda look like that on the surface, but it was more an issue of one awful slump, rather than an overall second half swoon, especially in 2023. In 2023, he really just had a terrible week or so, which unfortunately happened to be the last week of the season. He went 0 for his last 23, dropping his OPS from .855 to .801 in the process. Prior to that dreadful week, he’d posted an .846 OPS in the second half. This past season, of course, it was almost a whole terrible month — starting right around the day Mountcastle went out. From 8/18 to 9/15, he put up a .411 OPS over the span of 80 PAs. Absolutely awful. But sandwiched around that malaise were two good second half stints, with a combined .926 OPS in 130 second half PAs before and after that tailspin.    Anyhow, I don’t think there’s any way they decline that option. The guy is a quality hitter, so even if they do want to move on — which I don’t think they will — he’d have value to somebody at that relatively low price. Especially if they were willing to eat a few bucks to sweeten the return. If they somehow get a bona fide starting RF from outside the organization, then I think maybe they move him. You don’t want him blocking Kjerstad again, but at present, I think it’s reasonable to imagine that they could both find 400-500 PAs. 
    • Im not sure what the deal is with Holliday-to-CF truthers, but he was above average by OAA, average by UZR, and slightly below by DRS at 2B, so it feels like we should give him the opportunity to improve there rather than move him to a position he hasn't really played in his career.
    • If that’s the case , then they can trade Bradfield for other options 
    • Perez seems like an easy re-up to me. You need arms, they're not all going to be perfect. He's got some strengths.
    • Garcia is getting some pub from different spots.  Could be a major riser.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...