Jump to content

Markakis is the Key!


Capn Vivi

Recommended Posts

Nick Markakis was injured during an at bat in the 5/29 game against the Blue Jays in Toronto. In 28 games since he went on the DL, our offense has managed a paltry .639 OPS and 3.57 runs/game. In spite of that, the team has gone 13-15.

Meanwhile, our pitching staff has a 4.66 ERA over that span, allowing 137 runs (129 ER) or 4.89 runs/game.

Our pythagorean record since Kakes went on the DL is 13-15, so despite how it looks on the field, we aren't really getting lucky out there in our victories. Our team is playing poorly. What this means, however, is that once our pitching staff stabilizes and our line-up returns to normal, there's no reason we shouldn't continue to play above .500 baseball. This rough period isn't the team "returning to earth," this looks more like a collective slump to me.

Our team simply isn't going to hit this poorly or pitch this poorly for the rest of the year.

In the first 50 games (the ones before Nick Markakis left the line-up), our offense was collectively OPS'ing .755 and put up 229 runs (4.58/game) while going 29-21.

The pitching staff managed a 3.65 ERA and allowed 218 runs (190 ER), good enough for 4.36 runs/game.

Our pythagorean record during our first 50 games was 26-24.

The question remains whether the hitting will return to the level it was performing at earlier in the year when Markakis returns or whether the pitching will bounce back. If both return to earlier levels, this team could really be a contender. Trade Schoop, Matusz & Avery for another SP and this pitching staff could become a lot more reliable.

Once Markakis returns, I see them going to the following starting line-ups. I put each player's career platoon split beside their name in parenthesis (only ML stats).

vLHP

2B Roberts# (.712)

SS Hardy (.824)

RF Markakis* (.755)

CF Jones (.690)

DH Thome* (.768)

CA Wieters# (.830)

1B Reynolds (.878)

3B Andino (.651)

LF Pearce (.844)

Bench

UT Flaherty* (.667)

1B Davis* (.731)

3B Betemit# (.662)

CA Paulino (.851)

vRHP

2B Roberts# (.788)

RF Markakis* (.844)

1B Davis* (.766)

CF Jones (.807)

DH Thome* (.1037)

CA Wieters# (.762)

SS Hardy (.722)

3B Betemit# (.826)

LF Flaherty* (.438)

Bench

UT Pearce (.583)

UT Andino (.619)

1B Reynolds (.784)

CA Paulino (.630)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Nick Markakis was injured during an at bat in the 5/29 game against the Blue Jays in Toronto. In 28 games since he went on the DL, our offense has managed a paltry .639 OPS and 3.57 runs/game. In spite of that, the team has gone 13-15.

Hey, are you in Pasadena, Maryland, or Pasadena, California ???

Because if you're in Pasadena, California, we'll be expecting you to make it to at least one of the Angels games later this week. :laughlol:

http://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/showthread.php/122861-Calling-All-So-Cal-O-s-Fans-vs-Angels-Next-Weekend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how Markakis has anything to do with the quality of the pitching. No one gave him any credit for it when he was healthy, no one should be giving him any credit since he's been hurt.

He's not the All-Star .875-.925 OPS guy we thought we were getting but he's still pretty damn solid. It'll be nice to have him back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see how Markakis has anything to do with the quality of the pitching.

This is true, no question ...... although, the pitchers might have been helped a little if Markakis were out there instead of Ryan Flaherty, Chris Davis, etc.

No one gave him any credit for it when he was healthy, no one should be giving him any credit since he's been hurt.

I don't agree with this line of thinking. Sometimes, you don't know what you have until you lose it. Just because you take someone/something for granted when they are available, doesn't necessarily mean that they are not a key piece to your overall product. I'm pretty sure that a lot of Oriole fans that took Nick for granted when he was playing were absolutely missing him (both on offense and defense), and wishing that he were healthy and on the playing field ........ particularly in light of a lot of the buffoonery that we have seen in the outfield in his absence. I would bet a lot of money that Adam Jones misses Markakis dearly, and feels that he can't get back soon enough.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is true, no question ...... although, the pitchers might have been helped a little if Markakis were out there instead of Ryan Flaherty, Chris Davis, etc.

I don't agree with this line of thinking. Sometimes, you don't know what you have until you lose it. Just because you take someone/something for granted when they are available, doesn't necessarily mean that they are not a key piece to your overall product. I'm pretty sure that a lot of Oriole fans that took Nick for granted when he was playing were absolutely missing him (both on offense and defense), and wishing that he were healthy and on the playing field ........ particularly in light of a lot of the buffoonery that we have seen in the outfield in his absence. I would bet a lot of money that Adam Jones misses Markakis dearly, and feels that he can't get back soon enough.

I don't know, I don't see how Markakis not in the field has anything to do with Matusz being able to command his stuff, for example. Sure, there might be a double or two in there that Nick could have tracked down but overall a double or two isn't Matusz's chief concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know, I don't see how Markakis not in the field has anything to do with Matusz being able to command his stuff, for example. Sure, there might be a double or two in there that Nick could have tracked down but overall a double or two isn't Matusz's chief concern.

I said that it would have helped the pitchers a little. And I said that right after I said that you were unquestionably correct on that point. Did you not read that in my post ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said that it would have helped the pitchers a little. And I said that right after I said that you were unquestionably correct on that point. Did you not read that in my post ???

A little. But by and large the pitching issue has nothing to do with whether or not Markakis is standing in RF. El Gordo was actually right, we ran into a buzz saw of great SP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little. But by and large the pitching issue has nothing to do with whether or not Markakis is standing in RF. El Gordo was actually right, we ran into a buzz saw of great SP.

Milligan, must you get the last word in ??? You obviously failed (or simply chose not to read) what I said in my post, and then you ignored it again when I said it a second time. You aren't disputing what I said, you're just repeating yourself, and ignoring the fact that I said that you were correct overall about Markakis not helping with the pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Milligan, must you get the last word in ??? You obviously failed (or simply chose not to read) what I said in my post, and then you ignored it again when I said it a second time. You aren't disputing what I said, you're just repeating yourself, and ignoring the fact that I said that you were correct overall about Markakis not helping with the pitching.

I just like seeing you get all riled up. ;)

Nick is a key, but he's definitely not THE key. IMO, the ASB can't come fast enough, this team needs an extended rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just like seeing you get all riled up. ;)

Nick is a key, but he's definitely not THE key. IMO, the ASB can't come fast enough, this team needs an extended rest.

OK, I agree with that. The horrible starting pitching definitely was more of a factor in our losing than the absence of Markakis. Even Chen and Hammel laid eggs their last time out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Markakis and Thome will definitely help the offense with OBP and God knows we need that. But things wont get turned around until we get at least one more SP who can give us the consistency of Chen and Hammel.

Do you think that Chen and Hammel will return to form from here on out, and that they simply had a bad game last time, or do you think that one (or both of them) are about to steadily decline ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our pythagorean record since Kakes went on the DL is 13-15, so despite how it looks on the field, we aren't really getting lucky out there in our victories.

Where are you getting that information? The O's have been outscored 137-100 in those 28 games. That produces a pythagorean record of 10-18, 3 games worse than our 13-15 record in that stretch.

Markakis will help us when he returns, but we need a whole bunch of players to snap out of slumps, and we need our starting pitchers to do a better job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Just one add on IP.  Just looked, Kirby only pitched 67 innings last season, over 15 starts.  Seems likely limited, he missed a month due to a shoulder injury in 2021?  I'd see this as a similar use case as GRod.  He's at 152 IP this year.
    • Sorry, Denoyer wasn't part of that 5, but in my mind he was. The top 4, plus Denoyer and Mav is what I meant
    • He pitched 103 last year.  So an ideal season would have him at 125-140 this year.  Understand he didn't get there, but wouldn't you like to try to get 150 out of him next year so he's still there for stretch run/postseason assuming that's needed?  How do you make that feasible?
    • Pitchers to cut/leavingFA Anthony Castro Chris Ellis - 60 Day IL Logan Gillaspie Louis Head Jordan Lyles Jake Reed Beau Susler Chris Vallimont Spenser Watkins Cathers, IF Cut/LeavingFA Robinson Chirinos Cam Gallagher Tyler Nevin  Rougned Odor Jesus Aguilar I am going to give a spot to Diaz, its AAA Depth and we can always cut him after ST. With Means coming of the 60 Day, I think that puts us at 12 Open Spots I'm probably only protecting 6 MILB guys, so I would go into my offseason with 6 open spots and start crushing the Waiver Wire (the 5 listed in the original post plus Maverick (I know its slim, but we really have almost no catching depth in the milb and we have to protect it even if its a 1% chance hes selected in the Rule V) There's a part of me that wants to keep a couple of the pitchers listed above, but I believe many would pass through waivers and those that don't can easily be replaced on the waiver wire. That's probably where we could find some more catcher depth too, but I'd use most of those spots on more waiver wire pitching like last year.      
    • This is a huge winter for Mateo.  he should have confidence enough to put in the work to get better for next year.  The Orioles gave him a chance.  He took it.   Now put in the work Mr. Mateo.
    • Well, if you miss on 4th down, you assume they get it at the 2.  The idea that they got it on the 20 changes everything. I don’t mind the decision, after reading more and hearing more explanations.  I still think he should have taken the points but ultimately, I think at best they go into OT if they took the points and more than likely lose in regular time.
    • I mean, I can see being upset that they didn’t play well and blew the playoff chance.  I just don’t get why it matters that it was to division teams.  I’m more upset that they lost to Detroit and Oakland, teams that were far inferior.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...