Jump to content

Joe Blanton claimed by Dodgers and sent there for cash


Greg

Recommended Posts

I guess Amaro had a little negotiating power since the NL teams would have first shot on the Blanton salary dump. He probably told DD, look, you can definitely get him if you take the salary and give us a mid-level prospect. Otherwise, the O's risk losing him in the waiver process. Good for DD on not going there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I imagine there are many "good" owners and GMs who can think of better ways to spend $3 million than hand it to give it to Blanton for about 11 starts.

Oh yea, and we didn't get a chance to put in a claim.

Why? If this were the preseason, he wouldn't be worth it. When you're in a playoff race and your #'s 3-5 starters are shaky, that has a lot of value.

It's true that we almost certainly hope to find something comparable on the cheap, but if that doesn't happen this is just another ridiculous example of bad ownership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I give in. Blantons garbage. The O's think we have better options? Great, then get them in the rotation. Because other than Chen, what theyre trotting out there now isn't cutting it. Were in the playoff hunt now, the time for talking is over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I imagine there are many "good" owners and GMs who can think of better ways to spend $3 million than hand it to give it to Blanton for about 11 starts.

Oh yea, and we didn't get a chance to put in a claim.

Like they are gonna use the 3 million on something else. I get tired of that line of thinking. The Pirates went out and got Wandy and added alot to help their team, without giving the Phillies 3 million for Joe Blanton. Its not about Blanton. Its more about this team did nothing to improve themselves. If your not serious about winning, why bother getting Thome? Petey think bringing in a future HOF might fill a few seats?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I give in. Blantons garbage. The O's think we have better options? Great, then get them in the rotation. Because other than Chen, what theyre trotting out there now isn't cutting it. Were in the playoff hunt now, the time for talking is over.
No, No, we have great SP, it's just that they have to pitch in the AL East and face the DH. If they were pitching in the NL facing pitchers batting #9, they would put up better numbers than Blanton and probably most of the SP of the NL teams that claImed him....right?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like they are gonna use the 3 million on something else. I get tired of that line of thinking. The Pirates went out and got Wandy and added alot to help their team, without giving the Phillies 3 million for Joe Blanton. Its not about Blanton. Its more about this team did nothing to improve themselves. If your not serious about winning, why bother getting Thome? Petey think bringing in a future HOF might fill a few seats?

Good to see some of the newer posters "get it." :beerchug1:

Bravo sir, bravo.

MSK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's not get too worked up about Joe Blanton...

Exactly. Best comment all year.

Joe Blanton is so valuable that they let him go... For nothing. Their weak link shipped off. The last thing we need is another pitcher to come in and be inconsistent with ye majority of our starting staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eduardo A. Encina ‏@EddieInTheYard

O's trade Neshek for "future considerations." #Orioles #Athletics

Probably cash considerations. Its bad enough to not improve. But to sell a player to one of the most financially restricted team in baseball is a joke. An even bigger joke is we gave up a guy better than Gregg, to a team just ahead of us for a playoff shot. Defend that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably cash considerations. Its bad enough to not improve. But to sell a player to one of the most financially restricted team in baseball is a joke. An even bigger joke is we gave up a guy better than Gregg, to a team just ahead of us for a playoff shot. Defend that one.

Chances are it's for a PTBNL like the Strop deal last year. Has to clear waivers or is on the DL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...