Jump to content

Trade Jim Johnson to the Tigers


webbrick2010

Recommended Posts

Porcello and Rondon would help us stay in the playoff race, more than JJ would.

NEXT year, or the year after that. NOT this year. Get an established starter, who has had more success and can help now. Giving up an established closer while in a playoff race should warrant a proven starter in return. Not someone who isn't any better than Gonzales or Tillman- not that they are bad by any means, but we should get back better if trading JJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply
An objective person would say that a sweep by the SUX, considering the pitching match ups, is more likely than one for the O's. To ignore this is to take a swig of something.

Actually I think the pitching matchups are pretty good. Tonight we get there worst starter against Gausman so you could hope for a slugfest win.

Then Dempster (not very good) agains Tillman O's should be in this game

Then Lackey vs Garcia, advantage Red Sox but the O's should score some against Lackey

Then Lester who has struggled recently against MGon who is pitching his best ball of the year.

I think the O's can/should split, which is the minimum they need considering they are missing Bucholtz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would assume that they'd either move Porcello to the pen, or have better offers for a durable, 1.5-win, back of the rotation guy than two failed pitchers who offer no immediate help.

He's been closer to a three win guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An objective person would say that a sweep by the SUX, considering the pitching match ups, is more likely than one for the O's. To ignore this is to take a swig of something.

An objective person would say that the most likely outcome between any two reasonably competitive teams is a split.

If you had a .600 team playing a .400 team there's only a 22% chance of a sweep. If you use the two teams' current winning percentages as a proxy for their talents, the Sox have a 9% chance at a sweep, and the O's a 4%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An objective person would say that the most likely outcome between any two reasonably competitive teams is a split.

If you had a .600 team playing a .400 team there's only a 22% chance of a sweep. If you use the two teams' current winning percentages as a proxy for their talents, the Sox have a 9% chance at a sweep, and the O's a 4%.

poster.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An objective person would say that a sweep by the SUX, considering the pitching match ups, is more likely than one for the O's. To ignore this is to take a swig of something.

The objective person would say that a sweep by either team is unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NEXT year, or the year after that. NOT this year. Get an established starter, who has had more success and can help now. Giving up an established closer while in a playoff race should warrant a proven starter in return. Not someone who isn't any better than Gonzales or Tillman- not that they are bad by any means, but we should get back better if trading JJ.
Oh sure, I would much rather trade Tillman+ for Lee and cash, but nobody else likes that idea. Porcello woudl help us now, and so would Rondon. I am very comfortable with O'Day and/or Hunter closing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh sure, I would much rather trade Tillman+ for Lee and cash, but nobody else likes that idea. Porcello woudl help us now, and so would Rondon. I am very comfortable with O'Day and/or Hunter closing.

I have seen you say this a couple times. Why do you believe it to be true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The objective person would say that a sweep by either team is unlikely.
Maybe, but the objective person would say that 3 of 4 for BOS is more likely than 3 of 4 for the O's. Probable out come is the O's avoiding a sweep. Look at a the pitching matchups. I think a sweep of the SUX would require flying pigs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An objective person would say that the most likely outcome between any two reasonably competitive teams is a split.

If you had a .600 team playing a .400 team there's only a 22% chance of a sweep. If you use the two teams' current winning percentages as a proxy for their talents, the Sox have a 9% chance at a sweep, and the O's a 4%.

In general that's true over a large sample size but what you always seem to ignore is that a 4 G series doesn't work according to the numbers. It's about who's playing well at that time and the pitching matchup's, which involved more than their numbers as well. Who has a sore arm or a bad back? Who is slumping, etc. Right now the Red Sox are in better shape than we are. Our pen is stretched and we are sending out two SP who are not likely to go 5+ IP. Sure anything can happen. A sapit would be a godsend IMO.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen you say this a couple times. Why do you believe it to be true?
Because DET has been toying with the idea of him closing. I think Rondon would be better than Strop, and that would be a help. I am thinking O'Day and Hunter would close and I doubt we would skip a beat with them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because DET has been toying with the idea of him closing. I think Rondon would be better than Strop, and that would be a help. I am thinking O'Day and Hunter would close and I doubt we would skip a beat with them.

Have you seen Rondon or read up on him?

From what i have read (and the little bit I have seen) Rondon is a one pitch thrower right now. He does possess 100+ heat but his slider and change are not viable pitches. Now maybe he has made progress on them since he was demoted. I would think that if he had legitimate game changing stuff then they would have brought him back up by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...