Jump to content

Chris Davis tore a callus on his hand


JDBirds10

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Not this year he doesn't.

http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/parkfactor

Runs:

Comerica Park- 1.140

OPACY- .987

I'm not sure I'm willing to let ~45 games of data convince me that 3 years of data is wrong.

http://www.parkfactors.com/BAL

Oh. I thought you were one of those "Trout" guys.

I was one of those Trout guys. Even so, Cabrera was still the better hitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone is laughing and making jokes, but what if the soreness from the torn callus makes Davis hold his bat just a little differently, which alters his swing enough that the contact point on the sweet spot of the bat is maybe 1/2" higher or lower than before. That would mean HR's and line drives would turn into pop-ups and ground balls. Some very subtle differences can cause big changes in any sport.

I'm not freaking out about it, but I'm not as dismissive as everyone else either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

didnt he say, he gets them every year?

He did, but what he didn't say is what his performance was when he got them. I would expect he'd downplay it, but I'm inherently cynical when athletes talk. lol

I'm sure he'll be fine, but let's see what he does out of the break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The callus tore on his right hand in the 2nd round of the HR Derby. In the 1st round he knocked 8 HR's; in the 2nd round he got 4 HR's. He said he uses a bandage and padded batting gloves to help deal with them. Time will tell. 2 days off may help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • The Diamondbacks absolutely destroy LHP (.857 OPS, tops in ML) and the Orioles are going to start back-to-back lefties in this series. Don't get me wrong, I would  not change the rotation now with things going well, but I'm going to be very impressed if they get another good start from Means after what Irvin just accomplished. The Orioles are in a much better spot with regard to starter diversity than they were in 2023 and I think that's a very good thing for OPACY.
    • I think the bar is pretty low.  Don’t be as stingy as John Angelos.   Nobody’s expecting him to be Steve Cohen.  
    • It's gracious of you to admit it's a matter of personal bias. In just his first of two seasons with the Orioles, Belle provided a lot more offense (37 homers, 117 RBIs, 143 OPS+)  than several of the players you did list combined in their entire Orioles careers, e.g. Clark + Carter + Thome--all of whom, moreover, were much further along "a downward trajectory from age." Belle's first season with the Orioles was basically equivalent to the popular and listed Nelson Cruz's single season (40 HR, 108 RBI, 137 OPS+). I also disagree that Angelos and the Orioles' front office should have known that Belle's days as a feared slugger were over: he had played 143, 158, 161, and 163 games leading into his age 32-years-old 1999 season with the O's. The HR totals during those seasons with the Indians and White Sox were 50, 48, 30, and 49. He played in 161 and 143 games with the Orioles in 1999 and 2000. The degenerative hip condition that ended his career was not diagnosed until the spring of 2021, a half year after his second season with the Orioles. The sight of Belle in spring training nonetheless trying his hardest to run down the first base line on essentially one leg left no doubt in my mind that, as he had expressed to the media, he was absolutely dedicated to honoring the generous contract Angelos had bestowed. He had to be ordered to give up trying to play.    
    • Then Who goes to the Pen?
    • Kimbrel was good, no doubt, But I'm with Irvin. Who could have possibly seen the last 4 starts coming? tonight was more of the same, Hope he keeps it up.
    • I think it was the 1997 team that had Mussina, Erickson, Key...   Could be this staff is the best since the 80s but we'll have to wait and see.  I'm not ready to say it's close to better than the dynasty staffs of the 60s through the early 80s.  Those teams didn't just have good individual years but many years strung together.  That's what the O's haven't had in so long and need to get back to.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...