Jump to content

Would you bring BRob back next year if the price is right?


Frobby

Would you bring BRob back for 2014 if the price were right?  

107 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you bring BRob back for 2014 if the price were right?



Recommended Posts

I think BRob has shown he is still an adequate major league player. We have Schoop in the wings, but in my opinion he needs at least another half-season of MiL seasoning. Assuming he's willing to sign cheaply, would you want BRob back?

There are not a lot of 2B on the FA market this winter. There's Cano, of course, but let's rule him out as implausible. Here's the Cot's list:

Robinson Cano

Alexi Casilla

Mark Ellis * ($5.75 mm option, $1 mm buyout)

Mike Fontenot

Omar Infante

Kelly Johnson

Nick Punto

Ryan Raburn

Brian Roberts

Ramon Santiago

Skip Schumaker

Ben Zobrist * ($7 mm option, $2.5 mm buyout)

The Rays would be crazy not to pick up Zobrist's option. Ellis (.666 OPS, 1.8 fWAR) is more iffy, but I'd bet the Dodgers pick up his option, too. Infante, who is having a career season at age 31 (.790 OPS, 3.0 fWAR) is probably the only other guy on the list who would be a clear upgrade for us.

The other alternative, of course, is to just hand the job to Flaherty, whose offensive numbers are about as good as BRob's this year and is better defensively.

My biggest concern with bringing BRob back is that Buck will feel compelled to play him for 140+ games if he's healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I don't think he brings enough to the team to take away money they need to spend in other places. Another year older next year, another half-step slower... even if it's only 2 or 3 million above minimum, I just don't see it. I'd rather play Casilla, Flaherty, or Schoop than see Roberts back.

It's time to not put the band back together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think BRob has shown he is still an adequate major league player. We have Schoop in the wings, but in my opinion he needs at least another half-season of MiL seasoning. Assuming he's willing to sign cheaply, would you want BRob back?

There are not a lot of 2B on the FA market this winter. There's Cano, of course, but let's rule him out as implausible. Here's the Cot's list:

Robinson Cano

Alexi Casilla

Mark Ellis * ($5.75 mm option, $1 mm buyout)

Mike Fontenot

Omar Infante

Kelly Johnson

Nick Punto

Ryan Raburn

Brian Roberts

Ramon Santiago

Skip Schumaker

Ben Zobrist * ($7 mm option, $2.5 mm buyout)

The Rays would be crazy not to pick up Zobrist's option. Ellis (.666 OPS, 1.8 fWAR) is more iffy, but I'd bet the Dodgers pick up his option, too. Infante, who is having a career season at age 31 (.790 OPS, 3.0 fWAR) is probably the only other guy on the list who would be a clear upgrade for us.

The other alternative, of course, is to just hand the job to Flaherty, whose offensive numbers are about as good as BRob's this year and is better defensively.

My biggest concern with bringing BRob back is that Buck will feel compelled to play him for 140+ games if he's healthy.

Good points Frobby. With the caveat that he is there as a filler till Schoop is ready.

Would Roberts agree? If it is Ryan F. then the same deal is in place. I want to see

Schoop as the starting 2nd baseman in 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a tired topic. The management likes him... at the games I've been to, the fans still like him... he's had a solid "comeback" year... he hasn't stolen bases, but he's running the bases really well and is still fast... so I think he is going to get offered a reduced short-term deal.

Playing another year (or two) while Schoop proves IF he's a productive major leaguer or not (and we all hope that he's the real deal) is a good plan.

BRob is professional, scrappy, but the BIG thing for me is that one thing he has clearly demonstrated over the last couple of months is that he has BY FAR the best plate approach of anybody we have. That is a big deal. The whole team needs to take notes --- he's the ONE guy who is patient at the plate and works the pitcher.

Plus, I'll also give him this: he drives in critical runs better than anybody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Infante, who is having a career season at age 31 (.790 OPS, 3.0 fWAR) is probably the only other guy on the list who would be a clear upgrade for us.

I don't think a 31-year-old coming off a career year in a walk year (or a near-career year) is a clear upgrade so much as it is a trap. One of my litmus tests for a GM would be how he'd react to exactly this situation. I would expect Infante to provide less value for more money than just using internal options or signing players year-to-year on one-season deals.

I'd lean towards CA-Oriole's solution: some combination of Schoop and Flaherty, with some DD-style backup depth to be stashed at AAA. I'd also find a way to get Navarro some more reps at second, because I think he was the best-hitting second baseman in the system this year, Roberts, Schoop, Flaherty, and Casilla included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BRob is professional, scrappy, but the BIG thing for me is that one thing he has clearly demonstrated over the last couple of months is that he has BY FAR the best plate approach of anybody we have. That is a big deal. The whole team needs to take notes --- he's the ONE guy who is patient at the plate and works the pitcher.

I'm less concerned with approach than outcome. It's great that he works the pitcher real hard to put up that .307 OBP and .664 OPS. I'd rather have a "bad" approach that gets you a .750.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think BRob has shown he is still an adequate major league player. We have Schoop in the wings, but in my opinion he needs at least another half-season of MiL seasoning. Assuming he's willing to sign cheaply, would you want BRob back?

There are not a lot of 2B on the FA market this winter. There's Cano, of course, but let's rule him out as implausible. Here's the Cot's list:

Robinson Cano

Alexi Casilla

Mark Ellis * ($5.75 mm option, $1 mm buyout)

Mike Fontenot

Omar Infante

Kelly Johnson

Nick Punto

Ryan Raburn

Brian Roberts

Ramon Santiago

Skip Schumaker

Ben Zobrist * ($7 mm option, $2.5 mm buyout)

The Rays would be crazy not to pick up Zobrist's option. Ellis (.666 OPS, 1.8 fWAR) is more iffy, but I'd bet the Dodgers pick up his option, too. Infante, who is having a career season at age 31 (.790 OPS, 3.0 fWAR) is probably the only other guy on the list who would be a clear upgrade for us.

The other alternative, of course, is to just hand the job to Flaherty, whose offensive numbers are about as good as BRob's this year and is better defensively.

My biggest concern with bringing BRob back is that Buck will feel compelled to play him for 140+ games if he's healthy.

This is the main problem and even if Buck were to sit him at some point, he has no versatility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm less concerned with approach than outcome. It's great that he works the pitcher real hard to put up that .307 OBP and .664 OPS. I'd rather have a "bad" approach that gets you a .750.

In a vacuum I agree. But his approach, which no other Oriole seems to be able to adopt does have a trickle down affect. In four at bats, it could mean an additional 10-15 pitches for the opposing team, not to mention the additional looks that the other Oriole players get. I do have to admit though, it does not seem to have had an impact, as the Orioles offense does not seem have benefited from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big BRob fan, but I just don't think he has enough left in the tank to warrant a starting position next year. Now, IF, IF, he was willing to come back as a part time bench guy, I'd be all for it. I think THE biggest problem with the Orioles this year, and many years, is the weak bench. Its the reason Buck doesn't want to rest his starters, and its the reason why as a group they have ALL failed in September. These guys are just plain tired. BRob as a bench player would be a clear upgrade over what we've had there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big BRob fan, but I just don't think he has enough left in the tank to warrant a starting position next year. Now, IF, IF, he was willing to come back as a part time bench guy, I'd be all for it. I think THE biggest problem with the Orioles this year, and many years, is the weak bench. Its the reason Buck doesn't want to rest his starters, and its the reason why as a group they have ALL failed in September. These guys are just plain tired. BRob as a bench player would be a clear upgrade over what we've had there.

The problem with Roberts on the bench is simple, he can only realistically play second and DH. He isn't tall enough for first and doesn't have the arm for anywhere else on the diamond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...