Jump to content

Connolly: Orioles Focused on Adding SP, Not CL


luismatos4prez

Recommended Posts

Do I think he's a 2 win player over a full season solely based on defense? No. That's crazy talk.

He's (or at least was last season) a more-or-less league average offensive player, without considering the positional adjustment. He obviously gets a pretty large ding on offense if you consider his future position with the O's (LF). but his 2013 is not being propped up entirely on his defense. I'd argue that Machado's 2013 was propped up more by defense than Lough's.

For what it's worth, Steamer thinks he's going to be terrible next year, and Oliver thinks he'll be more or less a league-average player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think he is a good defender -- potential 60 grade. I think the valuation of defense is highly skewed due to sample size.

When you say '60' defender, do you consider position? or is that a position-agnostic rating (at least in terms of the 3 outfield positions?)

If he's a 60 defender agnostic of outfield position, and he plays LF, then he will likely save a lot more runs than average, since most plus-defenders play CF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he is a good defender -- potential 60 grade. I think the valuation of defense is highly skewed due to sample size.

Baseball Prospectus gave him a negative FRAA. So there is some disagreement about his defense within the analytics community

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't even know if Hunter can pitch multiple days in a row and they are ready to make him closer?

Just a guess, but I'm thinking DD is doing a little media negotiating to get guys like Rodney to lower their asking price and/or letting them know that these FA closers need the O's more than the O's need them.

The O's seem to only sign a guy if it comes at their price and on their terms. That is, unless it's for a hometown guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's (or at least was last season) a more-or-less league average offensive player, without considering the positional adjustment. He obviously gets a pretty large ding on offense if you consider his future position with the O's (LF). but his 2013 is not being propped up entirely on his defense. I'd argue that Machado's 2013 was propped up more by defense than Lough's.

For what it's worth, Steamer thinks he's going to be terrible next year, and Oliver thinks he'll be more or less a league-average player.

*Appeal to authority warning*

I think it says something that 1) the organization that has seen him play day in and day out did not consider him an asset of any real significance, and 2) a team that is paying a fair amount of attention to valuation of defense did not have interest in him when were essentially naming their package in the Shields deal.

*Back to more reasoned discussion*

He'll have some value on the bases. He'll play a good defensive left field. He'll probably post closer to a .260/.300/.400 triple slash with little to no power. That makes him an undesirable candidate as an everyday corner outfielder to me if I'm putting together a team I'd like to seriously compete for a pennant.

I think he's a nice 4th or 5th outfielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

an undesirable candidate as an everyday corner outfielder to me if I'm putting together a team I'd like to seriously compete for a pennant.
I think he's a nice 4th or 5th outfielder.

There's a quite a bit of middle ground between those two things. I agree with the first, but disagree with the second. I group him with Nate McLouth, Michael Brantley, David Murphy, and quite a few other good players in my "fine starter" category. 1-2 WAR type players, which is exactly what I expect Lough to put up this year.

Some elite teams might have 3 better outfielders than those guys. That doesn't make them 4th/5th outfielders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a quite a bit of middle ground between those two things. I agree with the first, but disagree with the second. I group him with Nate McLouth, Michael Brantley, David Murphy, and quite a few other good players in my "fine starter" category. 1-2 WAR type players, which is exactly what I expect Lough to put up this year.

Some elite teams might have 3 better outfielders than those guys. That doesn't make them 4th/5th outfielders.

If you want to call him a second division starter...maybe I can co-sign. But he's not a starting LF on a playoff team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...