Jump to content

Long term, do you think Schoop will hit?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply
And the point would be?
No one ever played with the name beginning with X, M has probably more 500 HR club members than any other letter and Q is no longer Jamie Quirk, but Carlos Quentin, and U never was Bob Ucker but now is Dan Uggla, soon to be Chase Utley, and maybe one day Henry Urrutia..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one ever played with the name beginning with X, M has probably more 500 HR club members than any other letter and Q is no longer Jamie Quirk, but Carlos Quentin, and U never was Bob Ucker but now is Dan Uggla, soon to be Case Utley, and maybe one day Henry Urrutia..

Uecker has a better chance of coming out of retirement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one ever played with the name beginning with X, M has probably more 500 HR club members than any other letter and Q is no longer Jamie Quirk, but Carlos Quentin, and U never was Bob Ucker but now is Dan Uggla, soon to be Chase Utley, and maybe one day Henry Urrutia..

Like I thought, no point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think height and weight have all that much to do with power. Hank Aaron was 6' 180 lbs., Mantle 5'11' 195 lbs Schoop won't hit as many HR as either of those two little guys. He will hit more than Walter Young, 6'5" 315 lbs.

I think you can find outliers who hit for power despite small stature. You can certainly find a bunch of fairly short guys like Hack Wilson who were build like fullbacks and could hit for power. You'll find fewer players who were short and skinny who hit for power. Maybe you'd be better off using BMI.

In any case, if you ask me to judge players' power only by height/weight, I think I'd do ok if I moderately, but positively correlated the two. The average 6' 4", 230 pound guy is going to hit for more power than the average 5' 9", 175 guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you can find outliers who hit for power despite small stature. You can certainly find a bunch of fairly short guys like Hack Wilson who were build like fullbacks and could hit for power. You'll find fewer players who were short and skinny who hit for power. Maybe you'd be better off using BMI.

In any case, if you ask me to judge players' power only by height/weight, I think I'd do ok if I moderately, but positively correlated the two. The average 6' 4", 230 pound guy is going to hit for more power than the average 5' 9", 175 guy.

I wouldn't bother with size at all, I'd look at bat speed, which is a much more important factor in hitting for power. I wouldn't call Mantle, Aaron, or Ott outliers. The point was being made that Schoop will hit for more power than Hardy because he is taller and heavier. I take it using your formula you concur.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't bother with size at all, I'd look at bat speed, which is a much more important factor in hitting for power. I wouldn't call Mantle, Aaron, or Ott outliers. The point was being made that Schoop will hit for more power than Hardy because he is taller and heavier. I take it using your formula you concur.

I said that if you only gave me height and weight and ask me to project power I'd do okay in the aggregate. If you also gave me bat speed I'd do better.

I think that Schoop might hit for more power than Hardy because of his stature, but stature is just one of many variables correlated to power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget it was 257 to the RF line in the Polo Grounds, and Mel hit 63% (323) of his homers there.

And Ruth had 295 for his short right field fence in his home stadium, heard rumors over the years, that it might have been shorter than the official 295.

Not trying to take anything away from Ruth, the fences were the same for the rest of the batters, not like they moved it, when only he was batting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think height and weight have all that much to do with power. Hank Aaron was 6' 180 lbs., Mantle 5'11' 195 lbs Schoop won't hit as many HR as either of those two little guys. He will hit more than Walter Young, 6'5" 315 lbs.

They absolutely do, despite the exceptions. Force equals mass x acceleration. Just looking at the home run leaders for 2014:

1. Jose Abreu: 6'3, 255

2. Nelson Cruz, 6'2, 230

3. Edwin Encarnacio, 6'1, 230

4. Giancarlo Stanton, 6'6, 240

5. Anthony Rizzo, 6'3, 240

6. Mike Trout, 6'2, 230

7. Victor Martinez, 6'2, 210 (I think he's more 225-230)

8. Troy Tulowitzki, 6'3, 215

9. Brandon Moss, 6'0, 210

10. Josh Donaldson, 6'0, 221

It's no coincidence that skinny guys like Dee Gordon and Billy Hamilton don't hit for pop. The little guys can usually get the acceleration part down, but not the mass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said that if you only gave me height and weight and ask me to project power I'd do okay in the aggregate. If you also gave me bat speed I'd do better.

I think that Schoop might hit for more power than Hardy because of his stature, but stature is just one of many variables correlated to power.

Probably the least among those variables. Velocity of pitch, and coefficient of restitution of the ball, velocity of bat swing, weight and coefficient of restitution of the bat, followed by body mass. And body mass in the lower half matters more than upper body mass. So maybe Schoop will hit for more power than Hardy, he's got a bigger butt.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...