Jump to content

How About Giving Dan Some Time Before Questioning His Offseason Plan?


TonySoprano

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 185
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You are right. I concede. Two of the four finalists in 2014 had one 100 million dollar player active. No toe dipper here!

You point to 1 year go look over the last 10 to 15 years. In the end teams that spend win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You point to 1 year go look over the last 10 to 15 years. In the end teams that spend win.

No they don't. Only the Yankees before the last five years. You are right things have changed. You can't buy a winner any longer. You have to lock them up when you can. Like we did Adam Jones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just answer this for me Weams. Let's say Manny is a flat out stud for the next 4 years i mean Mike trout level. No way this owner sets up and pays him 200m and this is way we can't have nice things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You were playing the what if game so was i.

Ok. Got it. You meant that if he were a free agent now he would not be an Oriole. I agree. Sorry about your loss BTW. Cruz was awesome for us an I never really gave you credit enough for banging his drum through thick and thin. Even when he stopped hitting for two months. He was a real treasure for us that one year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just answer this for me Weams. Let's say Manny is a flat out stud for the next 4 years i mean Mike trout level. No way this owner sets up and pays him 200m and this is way we can't have nice things.

Three consecutive winning seasons with two post season appearances during that time is a nice thing. At least it is to most of us.

Some things never get old. When you don't have something of substance to complain about, attack the owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three consecutive winning seasons with two post season appearances during that time is a nice thing. At least it is to most of us.

Some things never get old. When you don't have something of substance to complain about, attack the owner.

Even if it is your last holiday season to reach out and thank him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three consecutive winning seasons with two post season appearances during that time is a nice thing. At least it is to most of us.

Some things never get old. When you don't have something of substance to complain about, attack the owner.

So that's a no to him stepping up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just answer this for me Weams. Let's say Manny is a flat out stud for the next 4 years i mean Mike trout level. No way this owner sets up and pays him 200m and this is way we can't have nice things.

It's true. We won't pay Manny 200 million. And our organization already attempted to extend him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...