Jump to content

Toronto looking for New President to be Duquette.


OriolesManiac88

Recommended Posts

Isn't it funny that the two owners most un-liked by the new commissioner have been targeted. Reinsdorf and Angelos? Manfred is named in the MASN suit and Reinsdorf led the opposition to his candidacy. It's almost like these clowns don't believe they were caught for collusion and think that the rest of the world does not see their machinations.

Beeston voted against Manfred. That's one reason Rogers Communications wants to replace him. They don't want to be on bad footing with the new commissioner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Beeston voted against Manfred. That's one reason Rogers Communications wants to replace him. They don't want to be on bad footing with the new commissioner.

I think something lost in all this is the political intrigue going on in the background. Its no secret that there are those in MLB who would love to stick it to Pete over the whole MASN-Nationals thing. Beeson the current team CEO of the Jays opposed Manfreds election as Commissioner. In some respects DD to the Jay's kinda settles two scores. Now Pete can talk all he wants about contracts, blah blah blah but if say MLB said after this season that Pete could not prevent DD from interviewing for a "promotion" and that this was a long and time honored tradition blah blah blah. Sure Pete can sue, sure he might even win some damages but no judge in their right mind is going to interfere with the inner workings of MLB. Judges tend to be willing to award monetary damages but seem to defer to the league as to how to interpret its bylaws and management etc. Besides if MLB allowed DD to accept that position, what is Pete gonna do? By the time a case is heard, listened to and adjudicated DD will have been in Toronto for good while, no judge is going to force him to step down. If they award damages it will not be more than the value of the remaining years and I doubt that it is that much.

If MLB allowed DD to interview and accept the job, the best thing Pete could do would be to work out compensation, accept DD is gone and sue MLB for further damages. To some extent a part of me thinks Toronto never realistically expected to land DD right now, they are simply serving up the first salvo to poach him later.

People can say all they want that it is not a promotion, their opinions really do not matter. All that matters is that in the eyes of MLB and MLB executives it would certainly be considered just that.

Not saying any of this will happen but its not crazy to think that some elements of it are in play at the very least. Just saying there are more moving parts going on here than most of us have talked about

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think something lost in all this is the political intrigue going on in the background. Its no secret that there are those in MLB who would love to stick it to Pete over the whole MASN-Nationals thing. Beeson the current team CEO of the Jays opposed Manfreds election as Commissioner. In some respects DD to the Jay's kinda settles two scores. Now Pete can talk all he wants about contracts, blah blah blah but if say MLB said after this season that Pete could not prevent DD from interviewing for a "promotion" and that this was a long and time honored tradition blah blah blah. Sure Pete can sue, sure he might even win some damages but no judge in their right mind is going to interfere with the inner workings of MLB. Judges tend to be willing to award monetary damages but seem to defer to the league as to how to interpret its bylaws and management etc. Besides if MLB allowed DD to accept that position, what is Pete gonna do? By the time a case is heard, listened to and adjudicated DD will have been in Toronto for good while, no judge is going to force him to step down. If they award damages it will not be more than the value of the remaining years and I doubt that it is that much.

If MLB allowed DD to interview and accept the job, the best thing Pete could do would be to work out compensation, accept DD is gone and sue MLB for further damages. To some extent a part of me thinks Toronto never realistically expected to land DD right now, they are simply serving up the first salvo to poach him later.

People can say all they want that it is not a promotion, their opinions really do not matter. All that matters is that in the eyes of MLB and MLB executives it would certainly be considered just that.

Not saying any of this will happen but its not crazy to think that some elements of it are in play at the very least. Just saying there are more moving parts going on here than most of us have talked about

I'm pretty sure MLB does not have the legal authority to allow Duquette to violate his contract. He'd end up in civil court vs. Angelos. That's not a good place to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All we know is that Duquette has been named a candidate as the next CEO of the Blue Jays and he has not denied it. I wouldn't expect this whole process to go quickly so if anything does come out of this, it would be more in line for the 2016 season.

Whether Duquette comes out and clarifies his intent...well thats on him but who ever really turns down a promotion??

Its not a promotion. It might be a higher salary and different title but it is the same job just a different team.

Anyway people do turn down promotions all the time. For example the Ravens assistant GM. Not everyone is about making as much money as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not a promotion. It might be a higher salary and different title but it is the same job just a different team.

Anyway people do turn down promotions all the time. For example the Ravens assistant GM. Not everyone is about making as much money as possible.

Yes it is a promotion.

CEO > GM

So you are saying Angelos and Duquette have the same job?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading through all this makes me ask these questions...

Should the Orioles offer him this type of position? There is currently no "President" position with the Orioles.

Would he be interested in staying with the Orioles in this capacity or would he always be looking for the next "President" job?

He probably wouldn't accept it as that wouldn't give him an out. There would be no difference if he were called President or Executive Vice President with the Orioles. If he wants the title I would give it to him as it is meaningless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes it is a promotion.

CEO > GM

So you are saying Angelos and Duquette have the same job?

It is the same job. If DD went to Toronto he wouldn't be really the CEO he would still have to go to owners for budget and signing big free agents. Are you that easily fooled? I have been saying this for days and today Steve M's. interview with Keith Law says as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Duqette's position would not be the equivalent of Angelos'.

I remember when I first got out of college me and another guy started at the same time as Consultant I's at the same salary. Two years later he was a Conusltant III and I was still a Consultant I. However, I was making 30,000 more a year. Title's are meaningless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not a promotion. It might be a higher salary and different title but it is the same job just a different team.

Anyway people do turn down promotions all the time. For example the Ravens assistant GM. Not everyone is about making as much money as possible.

How can you say it is not a promotion when it would put him above the GM and the Asst. GM, AND would put him in charge of the Blue Jays Business Operations AND the Rogers Center? To have the same responsibility for the Orioles he would have to replace John Angelos and be given responsibility for Camden Yards, which currently rests with the stadium commission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is the same job. If DD went to Toronto he wouldn't be really the CEO he would still have to go to owners for budget and signing big free agents. Are you that easily fooled? I have been saying this for days and today Steve M's. interview with Keith Law says as much.

Maybe your right. Point is that what you think, what I think and what Keith Law thinks is pointless.

Within the structure of MLB and executive circles it is most certainly viewed as a promotion. Period the end. He would be paid more, its accepted in the league as a promotion and that is the end of it. You can argue till your blue in the face otherwise and it does not matter an iota. Its a promotion, you might be correct in saying its a half assed one but its still viewed that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can you say it is not a promotion when it would put him above the GM and the Asst. GM, AND would put him in charge of the Blue Jays Business Operations AND the Rogers Center? To have the same responsibility for the Orioles he would have to replace John Angelos and be given responsibility for Camden Yards, which currently rests with the stadium commission.

Some people just don't get it. It's a Promotion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some people just don't get it. It's a Promotion.

It is a promotion but it doesn't give him the power that some folks think it would.

He won't be able to write his own budget and he will still be subject to the whims of those above him. Of course with a normal team there is a lot more stability at the top then you get with a team that is owned by a corporation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some people just don't get it. It's a Promotion.

Even if he had the almost the EXACT same responsibilities but a different title and much higher pay structure, it would be viewed within MLB as a promotion. At the end of the day no court is going to try to figure out what is a promotion and what is not. Courts almost never get involved in the inner workings of leagues like that

If MLB says its a promotion, its a promotion. Like it or not you just have to live with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can you say it is not a promotion when it would put him above the GM and the Asst. GM, AND would put him in charge of the Blue Jays Business Operations AND the Rogers Center? To have the same responsibility for the Orioles he would have to replace John Angelos and be given responsibility for Camden Yards, which currently rests with the stadium commission.

Oh he would be in charge of the Rogers Center? I am sure that is something he would be tickled to death to be in charge of. If he gives up player decisions and leaves it to the GM than it would be a promotion but he is going to be doing the same thing as before. And I am sure someone else will be managing the Rodgers Center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • For me, bullpen strategy in a short series is developing a core principle or two and working backwards from that. That’s usually going to involve how we want to pitch to their best guys. In this case, there’s really no way to game Witt. He doesn’t have any discernible platoon splits, and in fact he destroyed RHPs this year. He doesn’t even have any particular pitches he struggles against. If you have to pitch to him, power stuff seems to be the way to go — if he has any weakness, it seems like maybe it’s LHPs who can attack him with high velocity and some sort of off speed weapon (Skubal, Framber, Kikuchi, EdRod, Rodon, Sale, Gore). So maybe you’re looking at Soto and Perez there, although you really just shouldn’t be pitching to him at all if you can avoid it. Beyond him, the other “hero” is Salvador Perez. And that’s from where I’d be building out my strategy. He probably should not see a LHP all series. There’s a fairly meaningful career platoon split there (109 wRC+ to 101), and it’s been more pronounced this year (130 to 110). I would be looking to force feed him ABs against Cano (1/4 with a single), Webb (0/2 with two Ks), and Dominguez. He’s always had trouble with offspeed stuff, which means Webb might be the preferred option. They’ve faced a ton of LH starters in the last week or so, but it seems like their preferred lineup against RHPs stacks LH hitters like Melendez and Gurriel behind Perez. Melendez is awful against LHPs, so ideally Perez might be the last hitter that the starters see. They pinch hit very liberally in platoon fashion in the bottom half of the lineup, so if you brought in someone like Akin behind the starter, they might very well hit for him. Forcing them to do that erases a lot of the platoon stacking in the late innings, so you could subsequently bring in a RHP to pitch to Perez without the same concern that they’d be exposed after him.    In sum, I think the ideal attack plan is for Burnes/Eflin/Kremer to see Perez three times, then bring in Akin or Cionel to pitch to the bottom of what will likely be a lefty-heavy lineup. They’ll potentially PH there, but that’s okay because none of those guys are that good. You then go to one of the RHPs for the top of the lineup, which it seems will consist of Pham, Witt (pitch around), and Perez. Then back to Coulombe or Soto for the bottom of the lineup again.
    • I have two tickets to Game 1 of the WC which I cannot use due to work travel.  Section 352, row 4, seats 9 & 10.  Asking $70 total for the two.  Paid $205 to the Orioles as a season plan member.   PM me if interested.  Paypal preferred.    
    • Can't make game 1. I'll be at game 2...last time I was at a playoff game at Camden, we beat Scherzer and the Tigers.
    • He should be taking fly balls all winter.
    • That was a lot of fun. Felt like there are certain elite seasons that had to be part of the team, and then tried to build from there.  Outfield depth is a little shaky, as is the rotation — though the latter is probably mostly unavoidable. The lineup would rake and the bullpen would shove, so pretty happy with this combination.   C 2022 Adley Rutschman (5.4 rWAR) 1B: 1998 Rafael Palmeiro (6.3) 2B: 2005 Brian Roberts (7.3) 3B: 2015 Manny Machado (7.5) SS: 2024 Gunnar Henderson (8.9) LF: 1999 Brady Anderson (5.9) CF: 2021 Cedric Mullins (5.9) RF: 2008 Nick Markakis (7.4) DH: 2013 Chris Davis (7.1) Bench: 2003 Melvin Mora (4.7) Bench: 2006 Miguel Tejada (4.5) Bench: 2011 Matt Wieters (5.2) Bench: 2001 Jeff Conine (2.9)   SP: 2000 Mike Mussina (5.7) SP: 2007 Erik Bedard (5.7) SP: 2019 John Means (4.4) SP: 2002 Rodrigo Lopez (3.7) SP: 2010 Jeremy Guthrie (4.5) RP: 2016 Zach Britton (4.1) RP: 2023 Felix Bautista (3.0) RP: 2004 B.J. Ryan (3.4) RP: 2012 Jim Johnson (2.4) RP: 2014 Darren O’Day (2.4) RP: 2017 Brad Brach (1.2) RP: 2009 George Sherrill (1.7) RP: 2018 Richard Bleier (1.5)
    • Gray started off well  but then ran out of steam a bit. He's not getting any younger. I was interested in him last year but I think the Cardinals overpaid and his contract only gets worse. 
    • A bit. Nothing life changing, but the format seems…Cleaner.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...