Jump to content

The O's will lead all of baseball in home runs this year


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I agree, RPG is the most important stat. What happened to the boom or bust offense in 2012 and 2014 playoffs? You all are acting as though plate discipline and the ability to manufacture runs is a bad thing. Unfortunately, the Orioles are particularly strong at either which is why they had several games with 0 or 1 run.

I did a few analyses the last couple of years that showed that the O's were no more prone than the average team to be subject to "bust" games; in fact, they were less so. I won't repeat it all here, but here is a sampling as to 2014:

- O's got shut out 11 times; league average was 11.1

- O's scored one run or less 24 times; league average was 29.2

- O's scored two runs or less 50 times; league average was 52.3

- O's scored three runs or less 72 times; league average was 76.0

So, the idea that our average runs per game is OK but that it is skewed by more highs and lows than the typical team is wrong.

Don't get me wrong, I like it when a team can move a runner over when the situation calls for it. I do wish we were better at that. But overall, the strengths of our offense outweigh the weaknesses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happened in 2014 is that the Royals destroyed BABIP over a four game stretch.

I wouldn't read much more then that in it.

Everything they hit dropped in, everything the O's hit got caught.

It has happened many many times. The playoffs are when the die comes up snake eye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did a few analyses the last couple of years that showed that the O's were no more prone than the average team to be subject to "bust" games; in fact, they were less so. I won't repeat it all here, but here is a sampling as to 2014:

- O's got shut out 11 times; league average was 11.1

- O's scored one run or less 24 times; league average was 29.2

- O's scored two runs or less 50 times; league average was 52.3

- O's scored three runs or less 72 times; league average was 76.0

So, the idea that our average runs per game is OK but that it is skewed by more highs and lows than the typical team is wrong.

Don't get me wrong, I like it when a team can move a runner over when the situation calls for it. I do wish we were better at that. But overall, the strengths of our offense outweigh the weaknesses.

I completely agree with this well researched and not shoot from the hip post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I completely agree with this well researched and not shoot from the hip post.

Thanks. I might add that while the Royals were very good at avoiding shutouts (only shut out 7 times compared to our 11), they were worse than us in all the other low-scoring categories.

0 runs: 7 (11)

1 or less: 32 (24)

2 or less: 55 (52)

3 or less: 79 (72)

Judging anything based on four games is a mistake IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. I might add that while the Royals were very good at avoiding shutouts (only shut out 7 times compared to our 11), they were worse than us in all the other low-scoring categories.

0 runs: 7 (11)

1 or less: 32 (24)

2 or less: 55 (52)

3 or less: 79 (72)

Judging anything based on four games is a mistake IMO.

They were very, very, lucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. I might add that while the Royals were very good at avoiding shutouts (only shut out 7 times compared to our 11), they were worse than us in all the other low-scoring categories.

0 runs: 7 (11)

1 or less: 32 (24)

2 or less: 55 (52)

3 or less: 79 (72)

Judging anything based on four games is a mistake IMO.

I agree with this.

By the same token, I don't believe that our 3-game sweep of the Tigers necessarily proved that we were leaps and bounds better than they were, either.

Our 96-66 record over the 162-game season DID prove (in my rat's ass of an opinion) that we were capable of going to-to-toe with any team in the majors last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with this.

By the same token, I don't believe that our 3-game sweep of the Tigers necessarily proved that we were leaps and bounds better than they were, either.

Our 96-66 record over the 162-game season DID prove (in my rat's ass of an opinion) that we were capable of going to-to-toe with any team in the majors last year.

That's how I see it. I do think the structure of the playoffs, with so many off-days, allows teams to hide their weakest starting pitcher (or two) and allows heavier reliance than normal on the top couple of relievers, and that will favor some teams more than others. And then there's just the matter of who's hot and who gets the bounces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Major league average was 3.82 P/PA, O's were at 3.80 and ranked 17th of 30 teams. http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/MLB/2014-pitches-batting.shtml As usual, Boston (4.05, 1st in MLB) and New York (3.90, 3rd in MLB) were near the top, but guess what? Their offenses sucked.

There is exactly one offensive team stat I really care about: runs per game. I don't care how they get there, just rank high in that stat and nothing else really matters in terms of offense.

Except that isn't a great stat either. Unless you want to believe the Rockies somehow always have a great offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am getting my Opening Day projection ready and here is one of the outcomes of the analysis.

People says how are you going to make up for the loss of Cruz and Markakis homers. I think the O's are built to hit homers. Here is what I see:

Davis 37

Jones 31

Pearce 24

Manny 20

Hardy 18

Schoop 18

Wieters 17 (playing 63% of the games)

De Aza 12

Young 10

Alvarez 10

Joseph 9

Paredes 6

Snider 4

Reimold 4

Flaherty 2

Cabrera 1

Total 223

More to come over the next few days..........

So basically you take a projection system like Zips or Streamer, bump everyone up 0-5 homers, and bump no one down any significant amount? This is how you get bad projections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except that isn't a great stat either. Unless you want to believe the Rockies somehow always have a great offense.

Fair point. Once you get into park adjusted stats, you can't calculate them yourself. So let's just say runs per game is the most meaningful "simple" offensive team stat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically you take a projection system like Zips or Streamer, bump everyone up 0-5 homers, and bump no one down any significant amount? This is how you get bad projections.

My numbers are based on the player's 3 year averages in most cases. If you don't agree with them, let see yours?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • His real age will match his baseball age in June.   He could have a role next year assuming Hays doesn't come back.  
    • High school players are also less likely to make the majors than college players. Picking Abrams or Witt would also increase the chances your 1:1 pick is a bust, or at least less than you hoped for. When I say Adley wasn't a "safe" pick, I meant that the Orioles didn't sacrifice much, if any, ceiling to raise the floor. I remember the vast majority of pundits saying that Adley was the most likely player in the draft to be an excellent baseball player. A few said they thought Witt or Abrams had a higher ceiling, but they also were less likely to reach it than Adley. And even they were like, "slightly higher ceiling, much lower floor, and C is more valuable than SS." Even if more all-star level players come out of high school, in that particular draft Adley was a special player who had a super high floor and a super high ceiling. The fact that high school players are more likely in general to be all-stars shouldn't blind one to the fact that there was an incredibly special college talent available at 1:1. Bottom line is the idea that the O's should have picked anyone other than Adley in that draft was a small minority opinion on draft day, and the fact that Witt and maybe Abrams ended up hitting their ceilings doesn't change the fact that Adley was the obvious choice with the information available at the time, and it's not like it didn't work out awesome for us. I would say Adley is definitely more likely to be a HOF than Abrams and probably Witt, too.
    • Yeah, but Westburg has become such a staple to the lineup and begun to establish himself offensively I thought they might do the Gunnar thing and say 3B is yours.  No more back and forth. 
    • I'm rambling now, but the 1928 A's may have been one of the coolest teams ever to hang around. Not only did they have a bunch of these old IL Orioles, and an unbelievable stock of young talent. But Mack had brought in some old guys, I guess to provide leadership and mentoring and the like. So on this one team they had the younger HOFs: Mickey Cochrane, Al Simmons, Jimmie Foxx, Lefty Grove. They had the Orioles in Boley, Bishop, Grove, Earnshaw. But on top of all that, they had 41-year-old Ty Cobb, 40-year-old Tris Speaker, 41-year-old Eddie Collins, 44-year-old Jack Quinn, and 35-year-old Bullet Joe Bush. Of course Cobb, Speaker, and Collins are inner-circle HOFers, among the best to ever play their position. Quinn was a grandfathered spitballer, probably worthy of a book or three, who won 96 games in his 40s and pitched his last MLB game at the age of 50. And Bush had a 17-year career where he won 196 games. The '28 A's won 98 games and only finished 2.5 games behind a Yanks team that was the freakin' '27 Yanks the year before. For '29 Mack say goodbye to Cobb, Speaker, made Collins a coach, plugged in the kids, and ran away with the league for three straight years. Until the Depression hit, Connie didn't have any other sources of income or wealth, and for the 2nd time had to sell off his stars to make payroll.
    • If they really want to get his bat going, send him to Delmarva!
    • Sounds like the FO believes Norby and Mayo (both righties) need to work more on their defense Holliday and Stowers (both lefties) need to work more on their hitting
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...