Jump to content

UMD v. Davidson


BmoreBoy

Recommended Posts

Eh, we had it all the way.

I think the Terps got a little caught up in the shooting 3's thing - easy to do when the other team probably threw up a record number of attempts. Hopefully, they don't have a hangover and go back to getting high percentage shots - for the most part. Good adjustments by GW. Whew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Survive and advance, that's the bottom line. IMO, we actually played better in the 1st half. Both teams got tired in the second half, we were lucky to have a little more depth and it payed off in the end. Twenty some turnovers is way way too many. We are not going win many more games, if any, playing so sloppy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't realize this until long after the game ended, but Ibekwe put up a double-double today. 11 pts 10 boards. Pretty good considering his limited minutes. He just needs to stay off the bench next game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't realize this until long after the game ended, but Ibekwe put up a double-double today. 11 pts 10 boards. Pretty good considering his limited minutes. He just needs to stay off the bench next game.
Yeah, imagine what he could do if he could just stay on the damn floor.:mad:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't realize this until long after the game ended, but Ibekwe put up a double-double today. 11 pts 10 boards. Pretty good considering his limited minutes. He just needs to stay off the bench next game.

Ibekwe played fantastic the last 7 minutes with 4 fouls. He was getting tough rebounds and avoided committing any stupid fouls.

Good game overall, too many turnovers, but they rebounded great and played good defense in the second half. Davidson has talent, but they don't have the athleticism to compete with the upper echelon teams. Pretty pleased with the way they played overall. It might have been sloppy, but they won and the effort was certainly not in doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ibekwe played fantastic the last 7 minutes with 4 fouls. He was getting tough rebounds and avoided committing any stupid fouls.

Good game overall, too many turnovers, but they rebounded great and played good defense in the second half. Davidson has talent, but they don't have the athleticism to compete with the upper echelon teams. Pretty pleased with the way they played overall. It might have been sloppy, but they won and the effort was certainly not in doubt.

Scale of 1 to 10, how drunk are you right now?:D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't realize this until long after the game ended, but Ibekwe put up a double-double today. 11 pts 10 boards. Pretty good considering his limited minutes. He just needs to stay off the bench next game.

your right...pretty remarkable for a guy who was in foul trouble the whole time...Osby played an amazing game in his stint though, getting those minuted from him is what I think really propelled the terps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...