Jump to content

Selig's salary


blueberryale77

Recommended Posts

Not really surprised.

However his compensation package is less than 1/4th of 1 percent of baseball's 2007 revenue. Actually, when you compare Selig's salary to other CEO's of billion dollar companies, he is pretty damn cheap. (queue obligatory "you get what you pay for" joke.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like a conflict of interest to pay someone that much when they have the power to cover up things like, I don't know, steroid use. Especially since his salary no doubt depends on the popularity of the game. He should get paid like the President of the US with some perks, but that's about all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like a conflict of interest to pay someone that much when they have the power to cover up things like, I don't know, steroid use. Especially since his salary no doubt depends on the popularity of the game. He should get paid like the President of the US with some perks, but that's about all.

To paraquote Babe Ruth, "He had a better year than President of the US."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just out of curiosity, what do the commissioners of the NFL and NBA make? I imagine that Selig's salary is very roughly comparable to theirs.

We know that most baseball managers make less than their star players, and most coaches make little more than the ML players minimum, but I wonder how many baseball general managers make more than their field managers do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just out of curiosity, what do the commissioners of the NFL and NBA make? I imagine that Selig's salary is very roughly comparable to theirs.

We know that most baseball managers make less than their star players, and most coaches make little more than the ML players minimum, but I wonder how many baseball general managers make more than their field managers do?

Goodell is making about $11.2 million annually: http://www.cnbc.com/id/23353673 or maybe a little bit more now.

I don't know what Stern is making now, but he was the highest paid commissioner in the early 90s at $3.5 million, so he is probably way up there now. He is probably over $20M, and 30 wouldn't shock me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess this really shouldn't come as much of a surprise, but MLB tax returns reveal that Bud Selig received about $14.5 million in compensation in 2006. That's more than any player on the Orioles made. Comments?

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AlkVqVKNJquvxemizedyL_kRvLYF?slug=ap-selig-pay&prov=ap&type=lgns

I don't see what that would have to do with anything.

He has a lot more responsibilities on his plate than any Oriole player does.

As a percentage of MLB revenue it appears pretty low. Under his watch, MLB has seen a lot of revenue growth. Maybe his pay is tied to that.

If he (or any CEO) can get the board to agree to a compensation plan- then more power to them. Just like if a player can get a team to give them a big contract.

I have no problem with either player or CEO making money that is tied to company/team performance goals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like a conflict of interest to pay someone that much when they have the power to cover up things like, I don't know, steroid use. Especially since his salary no doubt depends on the popularity of the game. He should get paid like the President of the US with some perks, but that's about all.

I gotta disagree with you here, the guy is basically the CEO of 6 Billion dollar company, and like I said earlier as far as billion dollar company CEO's go, Selig is relatively cheap.

In regards his conflict of interest, you can basically apply that to every CEO of every publicly traded company in the world. All CEO's have the power to cover up and/or hide things from the shareholders, and like Selig the truth usually comes out.

For all of Selig's faults (And he has alot) MLB has increased revenues almost 500% since 1992 and MLB is close to matching the NFL money machine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLB is close to matching the NFL money machine.

Not according to Forbes. Link

The NFL is still the richest sports league in the world (the average team is worth $957 million, 7% more than last year) as well as the most profitable (mean operating income in 2006 was $17.8 million on $204 million in revenue).

But Selig still earned his money. Link2

Three years ago, the 30 Major League Baseball (MLB) teams posted an operating loss (in the sense of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of $57 million. Last season, they earned a record $496 million. ... The New York Yankees led the league with attendance [in 2006] (the fourth consecutive year the Bronx Bombers have done so) with 4.2 million, followed by the Los Angeles Dodgers (3.8 million), New York Mets (3.4 million) and St. Louis Cardinals (3.4 million).

Only the Yankees are worth more than the average NFL franchise. In fact, the average NFL franchise was worth over $200M more than the 2nd most valuable MLB franchise in 2006. Link3

Since baseball owners won't open their books, the Forbes estimates have to be taken with a grain or two of salt, but they're still the best data we have.

I was looking for another Forbes article which stated that the average NFL team has an "operating income" of 16 percent of revenues, compared to 4 or 5 percent for the NBA and MLB, but I couldn't find it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goodell is making about $11.2 million annually: http://www.cnbc.com/id/23353673 or maybe a little bit more now.

I don't know what Stern is making now, but he was the highest paid commissioner in the early 90s at $3.5 million, so he is probably way up there now. He is probably over $20M, and 30 wouldn't shock me.

Fun fact: The NFL is actually a non-profit and exempt from the corporate income tax because it falls under IRC s. 501©(6). Or at least it was in 2005 and I can't see why they would have stopped claiming this exemption.

I can't say the same thing for the teams.

EDIT: Also, Tagliabue only made $5.7M in 2005.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not according to Forbes. Link

But Selig still earned his money. Link2

Only the Yankees are worth more than the average NFL franchise. In fact, the average NFL franchise was worth over $200M more than the 2nd most valuable MLB franchise in 2006. Link3

Since baseball owners won't open their books, the Forbes estimates have to be taken with a grain or two of salt, but they're still the best data we have.

I was looking for another Forbes article which stated that the average NFL team has an "operating income" of 16 percent of revenues, compared to 4 or 5 percent for the NBA and MLB, but I couldn't find it.

I was speaking in terms of just revenue.

http://money.cnn.com/2007/10/25/commentary/sportsbiz/index.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Trading Holliday could bring back just a number of good players from a number of selling teams.  As an example, if the Padres made Dylan Cease available and they wanted Holliday (though I doubt they would since they have no openings up the middle), the Padres would have to give up more than Cease I think.  It would cost them another player or two. But trading Holliday is silly.  Much better to trade Stowers, Norby and/or maybe Kjerstad, though I feel Elias will instead try to trade further down the prospect order.  
    • Trout to the Orioles doesn't make much sense but Trout to the Phillies does.  They need outfield help pretty badly and it's his hometown team.  
    • Grayson must really be disappointing people on this board. He specifically said he wasn’t hurting strikeouts and was good with early contact to keep the pitch count down. There are many on this board that claim this doesn’t work and strikeouts don’t up pitch counts despite what guys like Palmer say. The defense is that the data doesn’t support Palmer.  This is a data driven org and Grayson is saying this, the odds are very strong that it’s coming from the org and not Grayson just freestyling.       
    • Well, we already have Gunnar for 5 more years and Adley for 4.  So extending them is important but not going to negatively affect 2025.   I'd love to lock them up long term.  We can afford to do that and sign Soto.  That said, I'd only try to sign Soto if we have to trade our entire prospect roster.   I don't know if the Yankees can really afford to break the bank on Soto.  Even their money is finite and theyre already in the 4th tier AND they are paying the 3-year penalty.  They would be paying something crazy like 95 million a year on a 45 million deal.
    • You did not lose me at Holliday for Webb, But Jaun Soto? do you have any idea the cost, but no extension for Adley Or Gunner? And of course the Yankees would let us outbid them.
    • I guess he doesn’t get a video like Holliday
    • I care a lot less than I did last year when I thought the rest was some big advantage.  Now I would be perfectly fine with the first wild card
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...