Jump to content

Please get Matusz off of this team!


unitastoheap

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Matusz,as I have said before does good work for charity. He does much work privately and without the fanfare some athletes do.It is fine to not want him on the team but you don't have to badmouth him for his charity work.

Yup, I'm aware of his philanthropy, which is not to be badmouthed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last 14 days 8.10 ERA

Last 28 days 5.14 ERA

Those are miniscule sample sizes. I think overall, his 2.76 ERA, 1.14 WHIP and 10.5 K/9 are a reasonable reflection of his season. He hasn't been spectacular, and he has had a few bad games, but he's done a reasonable job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those are miniscule sample sizes. I think overall, his 2.76 ERA, 1.14 WHIP and 10.5 K/9 are a reasonable reflection of his season. He hasn't been spectacular, and he has had a few bad games, but he's done a reasonable job.

I agree, anybody can be made to look good or bad, if one cherry picks their stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, anybody can be made to look good or bad if one cherry picks their stats.

ALMOST anyone.

It would be difficult to make Sandy Koufax look bad by cherry picking any of his stats between 1961 and 1966.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/k/koufasa01.shtml

I suppose that it's possible, but I wouldn't want to be the one to make that argument with a straight face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those are miniscule sample sizes. I think overall, his 2.76 ERA, 1.14 WHIP and 10.5 K/9 are a reasonable reflection of his season. He hasn't been spectacular, and he has had a few bad games, but he's done a reasonable job.

In all seriousness it seems as if the rest of our 'pen is so strong that Mattress just doesn't belong. I'm in the "let him go" camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last 14 days 8.10 ERA

Last 28 days 5.14 ERA

Those are miniscule sample sizes. I think overall, his 2.76 ERA, 1.14 WHIP and 10.5 K/9 are a reasonable reflection of his season. He hasn't been spectacular, and he has had a few bad games, but he's done a reasonable job.

In all seriousness, it seems as if the rest of our 'pen is so strong that Mattress just doesn't belong. I'm in the "let him go" camp.

Frobby himself has conceded that letting Matusz walk at the end of the season may very well be a prudent decision.

His contention is that Matusz has been piled on like a little kid in a playground, and made to seem as though he is largely responsible for the Orioles' collapse this season, which he clearly is not.

Your own reference to him as "Mattress," right after declaring that your were commenting "In all seriousness" is a prime example of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frobby himself has conceded that letting Matusz walk at the end of the season may very well be a prudent decision.

His contention is that Matusz has been piled on like a little kid in a playground, and made to seem as though he is largely responsible for the Orioles' collapse this season, which he clearly is not.

Your own reference to him as "Mattress," right after declaring that your were commenting "In all seriousness" is a prime example of that.

Usually I'll let a lot of borderline idiocy slide (to do otherwise here would itself be idiocy), but this post contains some "reasoning" so faulty that it's laughable. C'mon, NY, you generally tend to be at least a little bit smarter than this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last 14 days 8.10 ERA

Last 28 days 5.14 ERA

Those are miniscule sample sizes. I think overall, his 2.76 ERA, 1.14 WHIP and 10.5 K/9 are a reasonable reflection of his season. He hasn't been spectacular, and he has had a few bad games, but he's done a reasonable job.

In all seriousness, it seems as if the rest of our 'pen is so strong that Mattress just doesn't belong. I'm in the "let him go" camp.

Frobby himself has conceded that letting Matusz walk at the end of the season may very well be a prudent decision.

His contention is that Matusz has been piled on like a little kid in a playground, and made to seem as though he is largely responsible for the Orioles' collapse this season, which he clearly is not.

Your own reference to him as "Mattress," right after declaring that your were commenting "In all seriousness" is a prime example of that.

Usually I'll let a lot of borderline idiocy slide (to do otherwise here would itself be idiocy), but this post contains some "reasoning" so faulty that it's laughable. C'mon, NY, you generally tend to be at least a little bit smarter than this.

Borderline idiocy, with laughable reasoning? What exactly is faulty in my reasoning, Mr. smart ass?

Do you think that Matusz is largely responsible for the Orioles' collapse in 2015?

Or was your cute reference to Brian Matusz as "Mattress" a compliment that I misunderstood?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This says everything about Brian Matusz:

1.06 SO/W against righties

9.25 SO/W against lefties

So he's downright filthy against lefties (465 OPS)...and pitches around dangerous righties.

His slash line against righties: .250/.383/.355 - .738 OPS.

The OPS is relatively high (not absurdly like in 2014: 876 OPS)..but it's very much driven off of OBP.

So Buck's usage of Matusz is pretty much to come on to face a lefty. And if there's a strong righty between another lefty, they'll pitch around that righty.

Unfortunately there are times (against Kansas City) that Buck uses Matusz and you scratch your head. For example, bringing him in against Kansas City only to have him pitch around the first righty is odd (especially with men on base). But even still...that's the reality of Matusz now. He's awful against good righties...and has to pitch around situations to get to lefties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This says everything about Brian Matusz:

1.06 SO/W against righties

9.25 SO/W against lefties

So, he's downright filthy against lefties (465 OPS) ... and pitches around dangerous righties.

His slash line against righties: .250/.383/.355 - .738 OPS.

The OPS is relatively high (not absurdly like in 2014: 876 OPS)..but it's very much driven off of OBP.

So Buck's usage of Matusz is pretty much to come on to face a lefty. And if there's a strong righty between another lefty, they'll pitch around that righty.

Unfortunately, there are times (like against Kansas City) that Buck uses Matusz, and you scratch your head. For example, bringing him in against Kansas City, only to have him pitch around the first righty is odd (especially with men on base). But even still ... that's the reality of Matusz now. He's awful against good righties ... and has to pitch around situations to get to lefties.

I think that that is a pretty good argument for not bringing Matusz back.

He has some usefulness, but because he has consistently been very bad against righties and/or has pitched around them, his role is not flexible enough to warrant giving him another $3 or $4 Million again next year (like we did this year.)

There are numerous other bullpen candidates waiting in the wings at the AAA-level in Norfolk and the AA-level in Bowie, and I would think that that route would make more sense, especially in terms of the financial aspect of the equation.

That said, $3 or $4 Million in terms of payroll for a mid-market team is not that big of a deal, and if the Orioles DO decide to bring him back, it wouldn't necessarily be a major gaffe ...... although if they do decide to keep him, I would really hope that they could somehow teach an old dog a new trick, which in Matusz' case would be to pitch more proficiently against right-handed batters. And if that were to happen, I would want the Orioles give $3 or $4 million to the man/men responsible for that transformation !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls. The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...