Jump to content

MLBTR projecting Chris Davis at 7 yr/ with salary in the mid 20m's


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If you really want to help your community, you make money with your baseball team and donate a lot of it to local schools, arts organizations, health and wellness projects, etc. Losing money on your baseball team so your "community" can enjoy a championship is the height of self indulgence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you really want to help your community, you make money with your baseball team and donate a lot of it to local schools, arts organizations, health and wellness projects, etc. Losing money on your baseball team so your "community" can enjoy a championship is the height of self indulgence.

Not saying that I disagree with you, but I believe Angelos has made a TON of money practicing law and has done all of these things.

I have no doubt that he could afford to throw some more money into the team and still be able to support the community. His other shareholders might not be happy about that, but I doubt that any of those folks are counting on profit from the Orioles in order to put food on their plates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and cruz plays on. what an apologist. not unlike so many others on here

Seattle has two 24 million dollar and one 14 million dollar contracts and then a bunch of guys making low end scale money.

The team is in next to last place, and not performing to the level the owner expects.

of course, somebody is going to take the fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, maybe we could trade Manny and Schoop as part of the rebuild. They could bring back several young, talented players under team control for a number of years.

Why would you trade young cost controlled players for young cost controlled players?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there are a fair amount of strategies that could be successful in between signing Davis to a ludicrous contract and a total rebuild. However, I also didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

In modern America the only two settings are absolute zero and 11. If you're not burning it to the ground and starting over, or spending a zillion dollars you're some kind of wussy Euro-socialist. Yes, I'm still talking about baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly.

Oh, got it. I assume your issue is with the phrase "blow the team up." It doesn't really look like a team you'd blow up. The valuable players are all young/cheap outside of Jones and Britton (who are still relatively young and cheap). So, there isn't really anything to blow up. I think it should without question be rebuilt, but there just isn't much to tear down and repurpose at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, got it. I assume your issue is with the phrase "blow the team up." It doesn't really look like a team you'd blow up. The valuable players are all young/cheap outside of Jones and Britton (who are still relatively young and cheap). So, there isn't really anything to blow up. I think it should without question be rebuilt, but there just isn't much to tear down and repurpose at this point.

Right. You have a core of at very least Machado, Schoop, probably Jones, maybe some of the pitching. You just augment that, add a farm system, and see where it gets you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely nobody made that argument about Cruz. The argument with him was solely about whether he'd retain enough value over four years to justify committing $58 mm instead of investing it in younger players. And the argument about Davis will be similar. If you have $150 mm to invest, is that the best way to invest it, given Davis' inconsistent track record? If he gives you three really good years and four disappointing ones, will you feel it was money well spent?

All things being equal, I wouldn't ever give Davis more than 5/90m.

However, we're one year removed from an offseason where we let two extremely popular clubhouse guys go (who were very good players) without a plan in place to replicate their output. The hit to clubhouse morale was deep and the Orioles never seemed to be the same in terms of team unity. Adam wasn't happy when Markakis left and the AAAA guys got DFA'd at a ridiculously high rate.

In this case, I'd sadly (reluctantly) suggest paying Davis for the sake of morale UNLESS the Orioles have targeted someone else in FA who could get us at least half of Davis' production. If we could get a legit RF and at least one TOR SP and a solid (not spectacular) 1B/DH type, then I wouldn't mind Davis walking.

But if Wieters, Davis, Chen, Parra and DoD walk, we're going to be in serious trouble.

MSK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right. You have a core of at very least Machado, Schoop, probably Jones, maybe some of the pitching. You just augment that, add a farm system, and see where it gets you.

Nope, if you don't sign Davis the team has no shot of being good again until like 2025. Tear it all down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bottom line is that the payroll isn't going to decrease by $40 million. They are going to pay someone, whether it is Davis, Wieters, Cespedes, Upton or someone else. Wieters, Davis, Chen, De Aza, Pearce, Snider, Hunter/Parra and Bud Norris's salaries and roster spots are not all going to go to players making the minimum. There will be moves made and players added in the offseason and to deny that just because they didn't add much last offseason because of $20 million of arbitration raises is to wilfully misrepreset the economic realities of baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...