Jump to content

Stop drafting pitchers in the first round


Ori-Al

Recommended Posts

We should fire the people in charge from top to bottom who can't develop pitchers before we actually just accept it and tailor our draft strategy around it.

Or you could be more nuanced and identify the characteristics you want in your development team, decide who on the current staff doesn't fit those criteria, and fix the individual problems instead of just firing everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Or you could be more nuanced and identify the characteristics you want in your development team, decide who on the current staff doesn't fit those criteria, and fix the individual problems instead of just firing everyone.
This may be the problem. Having a one size fits all pitching philosophy instead of working with the individuals.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why can't your characteristics or requirements include an overarching philosophy that can be tailored to individual needs?
It probably can but that has more to do with how well a coach relates to individuals, than any set characteristics, like TTP or no Cutters, etc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or you could be more nuanced and identify the characteristics you want in your development team, decide who on the current staff doesn't fit those criteria, and fix the individual problems instead of just firing everyone.

Or, you could acquire pitchers who most closely fit the mold, so you don't' have to change them and risk ruining what they've got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles have done a poor job of developing draft picks for a long time. However, since so much of the organization was hired after the 2011 season, is the lack of success prior to then relevant to this discussion?

Okay ...fair point to ask. Harvey likely needs TJ and Bundy had had it. I think this says a lot about the lack of competency in the system. Unless you believe it's just bad luck. I personally don't think that it is, the list is too long to say the Os just had bad luck. The fact that after drafting 1st round pitching heavy we have not developed one TOR starter is inexcusable. As I've said ...you can almost pick names out of a hat and do better. I agree that it is likely more development. I think the conversation speaks volumes about how poorly the Orioles have done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

o

 

I'm glad that the Orioles drafted DylanBundy back in 2011.

I'm also glad that they drafted Hunter Harvey in 2013, even though he is still recovering from Tommy John surgery at the Regular-A level in Delmarva.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OFFNY said:

o

 

I'm glad that the Orioles drafted DylanBundy back in 2011.

I'm also glad that they drafted Hunter Harvey in 2013, even though he is still recovering from Tommy John surgery at the Regular-A level in Delmarva.

 

o

I'll take Gausman as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/21/2015 at 1:39 PM, Roll Tide said:

I don't think the Orioles do any of it well! And I didn't want to go all the way back to have to mention Harnisch, Schilling, and Finley. My point is they haven't gotten much from either over the years. The 1st round record on pitching prospects couldn't be any worse...hell you or I could've done better. You could probably take the best available 5 guys when the Os picked and done better by luck of the draw alone.

As I said in an early post...they haven't drafted and produced a power hitting 1B since Murray in the 70s. Almost 40 years...that's really bad!

What about that Mancini guy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course you have to draft pitchers in the early rounds.  Where else are a team like the O's going to get them?

The O's do not do the international bonus pool thing.  The O's do not have the money to go after proven high calibre starters. (..and when they do, they go cheap and wind up overpaying for guys who everybody else passed on)   The O's dabble in the foreign leagues and pick up a back-of-the-rotation guy every 4 or 5 years.  (Chen, Koji,   Rodgrigous), They do scavenge other teams discards and get some AAAA guys and a regular pitcher every 3-4 years. (Givens, Castro). Other than that, they trade and pick up some second tier FA's.  All that is NOT going to get you 3-4 lights out starters.

Where do the studs come from?  The guys that other teams say "Oh Sxxx, he's pitching".    You have to draft them and develop them.   And then pay through the nose to keep them from leaving.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...