Jump to content

O'Day and O's have mutual interest


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

We're losing multiple starting position players(one of which being the MLB HR leader), our most reliable SP, and our $10 million+ starting SS is coming off his worst offensive season ever due to a torn labrum that could continue to hamper him going forward.

Spending $6 million or more on a 33 year old RP is not a luxury we can afford, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's pitched in 45 of our wins and 22 of our losses. I'd hate to see how many of those 45 we win without him. We don't have any aces on this staff. So we need a great bullpen to hold the pitching staff together. We had that this year and still couldn't do anything. Again, I'd hate to see where'd we be without the second best bullpen ERA in baseball. Keep a strength a strength. Pay for quality. O'day is worth 3/24, even a little more.

We've failed to produce TOR starters and we're never going to be in the bidding for one. So we have to stick with our formula of trying to get 5-6 IP from our Starters and hand the game over to the pen. Losing O'day would destroy this. Tillman, Gonzo, Ubaldo and Gausman aren't going to suddenly turn into consistent 7 IP Sp's. There's room to rebound next year but not that much. Let's face it we're going to have piece together our rotation and have a dominant pen. It's worked before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sign him at 3/21 (if you can), make him the closer. Trade Britton (return should be decent) and make Givens the new O'Day.

Sent from my LG-D415 using Tapatalk

Don't trade Britton. pffffttt! Having the two together is what makes our bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It's not something I lay awake at night and think about doing. I don't feel like I have to be a closer to be validated," O'Day. "But if somebody wants me to do that, I'd be glad to do it. I enjoy what I do. Sometimes those situations in the seventh or eighth are harder situations to get out of than the ninth. I appreciate what closers do, I'm not saying their job is easy. They want me to close or set up, I'll do whatever they want me to do."

Love it. You see from his spot duty that the man can close, but he doesn't bring the ego. Of course it does help that set up men are making more money these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3/21 is a fair deal for O'Day but I don't believe the O's should be paying it. I wouldn't be happy with that unless they are moving Britton in a trade or trying to convert him to starter and then making O'Day the closer. I'd like to see a little imagination instead of trying to keep the team together that just won 80-81 games.

Their imagination is limited by their payroll. They basically can't win in a bidding war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fippity doo dah. After four years of watching O'Day, I don't care much what FIP says.

Wouldn't that have been better stated as "get off my lawn, you stinkin' kids!!"?

We're losing multiple starting position players(one of which being the MLB HR leader), our most reliable SP, and our $10 million+ starting SS is coming off his worst offensive season ever due to a torn labrum that could continue to hamper him going forward.

Spending $6 million or more on a 33 year old RP is not a luxury we can afford, IMO.

If there's ever a year where they can afford $7M for a reliever it's now. Even if they're trying to sign multiple $15-20M/yr free agents it'll be difficult to exceed last year's payroll with so much salary coming off the books.

Now... that's not the same thing as saying $7M+ a year for O'Day is necessarily the best use of that money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't that have been better stated as "get off my lawn, you stinkin' kids!!"?

If there's ever a year where they can afford $7M for a reliever it's now. Even if they're trying to sign multiple $15-20M/yr free agents it'll be difficult to exceed last year's payroll with so much salary coming off the books.

Now... that's not the same thing as saying $7M+ a year for O'Day is necessarily the best use of that money.

Right, if one of their offseason goals is to keep payroll at 2015 levels they could find a worse way to spend the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...