Jump to content

Offseason Rumors and Deals Around MLB


neveradoubt

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think that is directed toward my response. :)

I would argue that Manny will be worth more to this team through the length of his contract than all the other moves we've made this offseason combined. I don't think it will be close.

I have no doubt you are right. On both counts. Just saying that hiring a big gun with short pockets and no team is always disaster. I can cite more examples. Not talking statistical values. Talking hardware. Manny along won't do a thing for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure I believe that because a group of players wins 81 games in one season that it necessarily means they are an "81 win team" the next season. The playoff roster in 2014 had an infield that did not include Chris Davis or Manny Machado but did include Kelly Johnson and Steve Pearce. That playoff roster had Nick Hundley and Caleb Joseph as catchers and this year's team has Matt Wieters and Caleb Joseph. Does it mean that Kelly Johnson, Steve Pearce, Alejandro DeAza, David Lough, Nick Hundley, Tommy Hunter, Bud Norris were 97 win team players? Should we seek to get them all back for 2016? Each season is its own entity and players progress, regress, have career years, get hurt, get replaced. As has been noted, it is likely if the pitchers pitch to their capabilities, we will do very well- in fact, we will likely win as many games as we did in 2014. If they don't, we won't.

Well said. Points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Standing by my belief he's getting signed long term. This looks like a placeholder.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Arrieta filed at $13MM and the team countered at $7.5MM, setting the stage for what would have been quite a high-stakes hearing.

Instead, Arrieta will land $450K above the midpoint. As MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz has explained in detail, Arrieta’s case provided a test for assessing arbitration raises. While the MLBTR arb model projected a $10.9MM salary after Arrieta’s monster 2015 season, Swartz revised that downward to $10.4MM as a limitation on the predicted record raise for a second-year-eligible player. Obviously, Arrieta landed right between those figures.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/

That would have been quite the contest if tried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no doubt you are right. On both counts. Just saying that hiring a big gun with short pockets and no team is always disaster. I can cite more examples. Not talking statistical values. Talking hardware. Manny along won't do a thing for that.

I can't disagree with what you're saying. If the O's farm system were deep and the development of players was on par with the Rays, Cards, or other proven teams, this wouldn't be such a big issue. You'd have an influx of young talent coming through the pipeline that would allow you to give Manny the big bucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then they were very wise to settle.

The pay raise Jake got after his Cy Young season in his second year of arbitration ($3.6 mm to $10.7 mm) is very close to the raise Chris Davis got after his 53 HR, 138 RBI season ($3.3 mm to $10.35 mm). Makes sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

Blue Jays Sign Josh Donaldson to Two-Year Deal, $29 Million

(By Richard Griffin)

http://www.thestar.com/sports/baseball/2016/02/08/jays-sign-josh-donaldson-to-two-year-deal.html

Makes sense. Donaldson doesn't strike me as someone that would respond well to the arbitration process.

Also smart to keep it to two years.

He broke into the majors late and this contact will cover his 30-31 seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...