Jump to content

Trade Target: Chris Coghlan


CaptainRedbeard

Recommended Posts

After the Cubs signing Heyward, they now have Schwarber in LF, Heyward in CF, and Soler in RF. They'll likely trade Soler for a pitcher, but they may not want to go completely LH heavy in the OF, since Schwarber and Heyward are already weak to LHP. There's a good chance Coghlan will be available.

Coghlan is a classic lefty platoon OF, which may be exactly what we need. He hit RHP at a .831 OPS last year. He walks a lot, doesn't strike out too much, and after not hitting for any power his whole career it seems like something may have clicked the last two years - he hit 9 HR in 432 PA in 2014, and then 16 in 503 PA in 2015. He played a good LF and has some versatility, at RF and 2B. He's only projected to earn $3.9 million in arbitration, in his last year before FA eligibility, so he's cheap but shouldn't cost too much in trade.

Thoughts? We all want a big bat but we need to fill the other OF position somehow as well, and he seems a better option than the likes of Will Venable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The Orioles don't need platoon players! They have money ... Spend it on complete players.

Eh. I would rather spend a lot of money on one [more] complete player and leverage two roster spots of platoon for the corner OF rather than spending similar money on two [less] complete players. We're not going to sign Upton AND Gordon, so I'd rather sign one of them and be creative with the other spot than sign two 2nd-tier OF options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles don't need platoon players! They have money ... Spend it on complete players.

Right now they have Trumbo as the only "complete" non-platoon player for 1B/DH/LF/RF. They need to spend money to get at least one more complete player, but they probably don't have enough to get 2, and certainly not 3 more. They're going to need at least one left-handed platoon player. Coghlan is significantly more appealing than the FA options in the same platoon-player price range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...