Jump to content

Boras contracts/extensions


CP0861

Recommended Posts

I thought this was interesting. For all those players who make the comments "it's outta my hands" and "I let my agent handle that" and also play dumb during negotiations (obviously, Chris Davis immediately comes to mind)......it's nice to hear an honest response.

It'll will be interesting to hear how Machado responds whenever his extension talks heat up.

"Although the season nears, Arrieta doesn't mind being involved in negotiations; in fact, he's at the forefront of them. Epstein and agent Scott Boras may discuss things, but Arrieta is not far from being involved.

"Both sides know I need to be in the loop, and it's pretty much unacceptable otherwise," he said."

from this article: http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/cubs/post/_/id/36841/jake-arrieta-back-on-the-mound-and-mowing-down-hitters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought this was interesting. For all those players who make the comments "it's outta my hands" and "I let my agent handle that" and also play dumb during negotiations (obviously, Chris Davis immediately comes to mind)......it's nice to hear an honest response.

It'll will be interesting to hear how Machado responds whenever his extension talks heat up.

"Although the season nears, Arrieta doesn't mind being involved in negotiations; in fact, he's at the forefront of them. Epstein and agent Scott Boras may discuss things, but Arrieta is not far from being involved.

"Both sides know I need to be in the loop, and it's pretty much unacceptable otherwise," he said."

from this article: http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/cubs/post/_/id/36841/jake-arrieta-back-on-the-mound-and-mowing-down-hitters

Manny is not a Boras client.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manny is not a Boras client.

I know...shouldn't have mentioned Boras in the subject. I just thought it was interesting to hear a player say "I need to be in the loop." That's rare, and with Machado's extension potentially looming in the very near future (unless you think they wait until the last year, which I don't see as an option), I think it will be interesting to hear how Machado approaches everything....as the potential face of the franchise for the next decade or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know...shouldn't have mentioned Boras in the subject. I just thought it was interesting to hear a player say "I need to be in the loop." That's rare, and with Machado's extension potentially looming in the very near future (unless you think they wait until the last year, which I don't see as an option), I think it will be interesting to hear how Machado approaches everything....as the potential face of the franchise for the next decade or so.

Jake has a bit of history being outspoken about things.

I think most players are best served with presenting the front that they are removed from the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake has a bit of history being outspoken about things.

I think most players are best served with presenting the front that they are removed from the process.

Completely agreed. Fans already put way too much stock into a players state of mind affecting their on the field performance. The last thing they need is a bunch of fans using coorelation to come to the conclusion that someones contract negotiation is causing them to play worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake has a bit of history being outspoken about things.

I think most players are best served with presenting the front that they are removed from the process.

Absolutely. Let the agent be the bad guy. As an agent (RE), I don't want my clients becoming the focus of the other party's discontent during a tough negotiation. If the other party is to be angry with someone, it's best they are mad at me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake has a bit of history being outspoken about things.

I think most players are best served with presenting the front that they are removed from the process.

He might be outspoken, but in this scenario, I think he's just being honest instead of presenting that front.

I guess to me, it's so unbelievable when they play dumb that it completely discredits them....to me, anyway. Makes me think they are coached puppets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He might be outspoken, but in this scenario, I think he's just being honest instead of presenting that front.

I guess to me, it's so unbelievable when they play dumb that it completely discredits them....to me, anyway. Makes me think they are coached puppets.

I think he was just being honest when he ripped the O's minor league spring training facilities.

Still wasn't a smart thing to do.

I just ignore all the platitudes that players spew about things like contract extensions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...