Jump to content

What percentage of the game is defense?


ChuckS

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Considering half the game is scoring runs and the other half is preventing runs it has to be some percentage of the larger preventing runs percentage.

About 7 to 8 outs a game come from strikeouts where the defense doesn't touch the ball and another 10 or more are from routine plays. The average teams makes only about 0.6 errors a game, so the amount of routine plays not made is not hugely significant. The percentage of time that error has a real impact on the game or final score makes it even less significant.

I view defense at about 1/3 of the overall run prevention factor, and around 15 percent of the overall game factor. This is not very scientific Of course, other factors like pitch framing and defensive alignment are a little more difficult to quantify and it helps to have a guy like Jonathan Schoop that can really turn the DP even though it looks routine.

Thoughts? Am I low or high with this 15 percent number?

20 percent? 18%? 15 is probably it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defense is cheaper than pitching, so of course the Orioles value defense more.

More likely they realize that with short outfield fences and playing in the AL East, pitchers don't want to come here - unless we back them up with great defense to compensate. And the Orioles do have very good defense everywhere except corner outfield. (And we used to be good there as well, alas.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More likely they realize that with short outfield fences and playing in the AL East, pitchers don't want to come here - unless we back them up with great defense to compensate. And the Orioles do have very good defense everywhere except corner outfield. (And we used to be good there as well, alas.)

The Twins announcers were raving about Trumbo out there. Kim looked great in left the last two games I saw him play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Gausman in the rotation from day one?

Sure.

Despite it being a career year for Bud he wasn't appreciably better than any of the other five guys.

I think that is certainly debatable. You could fantasize about what Gausman may have done and how he may have progressed. Bud's body of work was fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...