Jump to content

Expensive $$$ Offseason-What would have done differently?


Rene88

Recommended Posts

I would have signed Upton, Kazmir (thrown a little more money at him than Dodgers if necessary), and Alvarez. I was against the O'Day signing initially, but knowing now how they were willing to stretch the budget I would have brought him back. I was fine with the Kim deal when it happened, so he would have still been brought in to play LF.

No QO to Wieters, no Davis resigning, no Trumbo trade, and no Gallardo signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Well it depends on whether it's real world or fantasy world. In the real world one has to jump through PA's hoops/ In the fantasy world of wanna be GM's, they have a chunk of money to do with as they see fit. Just how much did we actually spend including the deferred money? 50M?

This sums up things quite nicely. Hard to know who's in charge, a common theme since the 90's unfortunately.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zimmermann wanted to be in the Midwest.

Cespedes wanted to be in New York.

Gordon wanted to stay in KC.

Kazmir was offered much more money with an opt out by a rich contender in the NL in a pitchers park. And he has apparently lost quite a bit off his fast ball.

The money given CD was reportedly only authorized by PA for CD alone. It wasn't CD or Heyward or Upton. It was CD or nobody.

Yet we keep on with countless posts and threads that ignore these facts.

Heck, if we are going to do that, let's just go for the brass ring. We should have traded our bottom bench players without options and non-ranked prospects for Kershaw, Harper, and Trout and required that the bulk of their salaries be eaten by their former teams. Anything less is a total failure. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The money given CD was reportedly only authorized by PA for CD alone. It wasn't CD or Heyward or Upton. It was CD or nobody.

:rolleyes:

Pretty troubling that PA is still trying to be a GM if this is true. I hate when it all comes back to him because he's the only one whose contract doesn't run out.

I wouldn't have given CD that contract as I think it's unlikely he will earn all of it. He is too unpredictable performance wise for my tastes. I would have gone after Upton instead. I would have gone after Price or Cueto. I'm not sure about the QO on Wieters, but I think it was a sure thing he would accept it. Hard to believe $15.8M was the QO for him, though. That seems a little steep. I think we would have been better off with Joseph/Clevenger and would not have traded for Trumbo. I think I would have signed Alvarez and gone after Span.

I have a bad feeling about this season TBH. Things just aren't fitting together right plus we have a rotation (aside from Gausman) full of liabilities barring a miracle like if Bundy and Wilson become viable starters this season which is possible, of course. I don't have much hope for Wright, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This offseason is a troubling one for me. I have no idea how I would have fixed the pitching problem, as I thought ALL the contracts given out were too much. You probably had to go all in for someone like Price or I would have tried Fister. But here are some things I would have done:

1. I would have still offered Matt the QO, but spoke with him ahead of time and told him it was just a nice gesture and we did not want him to take it. I would tell him if he did, he would not build up his value as he would be splitting time 50/50 with Joseph and would be expected to DH quite a bit.

2. I love the Clevenger for Trumbo deal. I would have given Davis my "best" offer long before that. Once the deal went through for Trumbo, I would have told Chris "Thanks for the memories". I only would have considered him late in the offseason if he value severely dropped.

3. I go all in to get Cespedes. No QO required and would have made it happen. He replaces Davis' big bat and Trumbo is giving me more production than anyone in RF last season. They aren't in the same positions, but I bet Trumbo at 1B and Cespedes in the OF gives the same production at Davis at 1B and whoever else roamed RF last season, plus I get a pick for Davis.

4. Now, if Wieters has accepted my QO, I probably turn to Fister. If he hadn't, then I might consider someone like Price or Heyward.

That probably gets payroll close to where we are now, I think

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hindsight is 20-20:)

Oh Jesus the season hasn't even started yet.

But there's no coincidence that the same people who advocate spending piles of money on 30-something power hitters carry that same lack of patience and foresight when they're panicking in the middle of March.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this is a balanced team, and I don't think DD did a good job improving the rotation. Though I really don't know what I would have done differently that would have been better.

Let's assume that all money spent this offseason was available for anybody (I understand the Davis reality). From my rough estimate, we added around $67M for 2016 FA.

Kazmir would either cost more than $16M or maybe we get him for 5/80 if we don't give the opt out. He is having problems breaking a plane of glass with his fastball.

I love watching Cueto pitch. But man, I'd be hesitant to give him $130M.

Spending $30M for price gives you another $37 to fill two OF spots, 1B and DH.

I would have been open to giving Fister more than $7M, up to $10M, on a 1 year make good contract.

Zimmermann wasn't coming here. Kennedy was a horrible deal. Smardijza is a much worse deal than Gallardo.

Gordon wasn't leaving KC. We offered more guaranteed money to Cespedes and Fowler.

Cincinnati turned down Wheeler for Bruce last season. I have no idea what they are asking for now. This team is in a weak position to trade prospects for established talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have traded one of Tillman/Jimenez, let O'Day walk, let Davis walk, signed Aoki, Zimmermann, Fister

I like the Alvarez signing, Kim too even though it's a real gamble, I would have liked to see Jon Singleton traded for and let him compete with Walker for 1b with Alvarez as a backup plan. I definitely wouldn't have done Trumbo.

We needed pitching so badly and we've got a rotation of 4 and 5 type guys. It's gotta be one of the worst rotations in baseball and Gallardo was all we could muster?

Not a fan of this offseason. But still excited nonetheless. Baseball is baseball whoever is on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two second tier prospects

I guess that second tier is not quite clear. What constitutes a top tier prospect? BA top 100? So if the asking price was Reyes and Lee, should we do that? I'd rather have Trumbo and Alvarez.

I would have also explored trading Britton if the right deal was on the table. Knowing the cost of Kimbel and Giles, I would have been on that even if the return was not ready to help in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let Davis walk.

Sign Heyward.

Extend Manny.

Like the Kim signing.

Sign Pearce, not resign Reimold.

Sign Alvarez.

Sign Rickard.

Assuming Wieters accepted the QO (I would have accepted it), I actually like Trumbo at 1B and Alvarez at DH.

Honestly I'd have punted this season and see how the young guys do. Yes, it's be painful but we'd have a nice haul of draft picks. And if Ubaldo is doing well mid season I would see if we could flip him.

I don't like Gallardo.

I don't like that we bid against ourselves with Davis.

I don't like that we don't have an outfield to be speak of for the future.

I don't like that we have a million DH's on this team.

This team needs an influx of young talent. Giving away top draft picks for declining pitchers like Gallardo all the while trading our young talent left and right really shows Duquette lacks any meaningful direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team needs an influx of young talent. Giving away top draft picks for declining pitchers like Gallardo all the while trading our young talent left and right really shows Duquette lacks any meaningful direction.

I might be out of line with this, but is it possible DD is still pissed that we didn't let him go to Toronto? It all started with that offseason last year where he was probably having wet dreams about going to Toronto and wasn't focused on improving the team. This year, now we're spending money irrationally and attempting to address everything but the pitching really? Are we just going back to the days of overvaluing our pitching? Gallardo is better than nothing, but unless he has some kind of resurgence, it probably won't be worth the money or the pick we gave up for him. Is our FO losing their minds? Is PA meddling where he shouldn't be again? I can't imagine the relationship between DD, PA and Buck is the same as it was before the Toronto debacle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Let Davis walk or make him a take it or leave it offer of 4 years, $100 million.

2. If Davis turns down the contract offer, use the money to sign Jordan Zimmerman or Mike Leake. If Davis accepts the offer, sign Mat Latos or Doug Fister.

3. Sign Denard Span.

4. Post the winning bid for Byung-Ho Park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might be out of line with this, but is it possible DD is still pissed that we didn't let him go to Toronto? It all started with that offseason last year where he was probably having wet dreams about going to Toronto and wasn't focused on improving the team. This year, now we're spending money irrationally and attempting to address everything but the pitching really? Are we just going back to the days of overvaluing our pitching? Gallardo is better than nothing, but unless he has some kind of resurgence, it probably won't be worth the money or the pick we gave up for him. Is our FO losing their minds? Is PA meddling where he shouldn't be again? I can't imagine the relationship between DD, PA and Buck is the same as it was before the Toronto debacle.

Yes this is totally stupid. The guys a pro and he wants a future in MLB .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Vlad Jr and Burnes....my priorities. Then you can trade Mayo for MMiller.
    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...