Jump to content

Britton starts today...Roch wonders what's next?


Rene88

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I would be concerned that Britton's 2nd and 3rd pitches are too inconsistent to be a very good starter.

Or he could just go the Kevin Brown and Scott Erickson route and just dominate with sinker after after sinker. If I knew he would succeed as a starter I would absolutely throw him into the rotation with hopefully Givens eventually taking over the 9th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or he could just go the Kevin Brown and Scott Erickson route and just dominate with sinker after after sinker. If I knew he would succeed as a starter I would absolutely throw him into the rotation with hopefully Givens eventually taking over the 9th.

We have pitch data for the tail end of Erickson's career and he threw about 66% fastballs. Same with Brown, but about 75%. Britton is around 90%. Not really the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pitching for Single-A Frederick, Britton was the starting pitcher and buzzed through several Minnesota Twins Single-A batters. He got seven outs over two scoreless innings, allowing just two infield hits. He fanned two throwing 28 pitches, 20 for strikes.

"It was good," Britton said after his outing at the Buck O'Neil Baseball Complex at Twin Lakes Park. "I needed to get a two-inning outing in, that was big. Get the pitch count up. Sit down and get back out there. I actually think I found my stuff a little more in that second inning, even though the first one was pretty good. A lot of weak groundballs and that is what I'm looking for."

Britton's longest big league outing last season, when he went 4-1 with a 1.92 ERA and 36 saves, was 2 1/3 innings. He doesn't expect to have another two-inning spring appearance.

"No, this is it. Last year we just did one in spring. He (manager Buck Showalter) wants me to stay fresh. He didn't want to do it in a big league game. This is more controlled. We could end an inning if my pitch count got too high."

http://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2016/03/zach-britton-talks-about-his-outing-and-other-notes-from-twin-lakes-park.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have pitch data for the tail end of Erickson's career and he threw about 66% fastballs. Same with Brown, but about 75%. Britton is around 90%. Not really the same thing.

Interesting. Sure seemed like they threw it more. I think Zach probably needs to stay right where he is despite our desperate need for rotation help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People need to remember that when Zach was a starter, his fastball averaged 92 - not the 96 it averages as a short spurt reliever. Jim Johnson got the same kind of velocity jump as he adjusted to relief. I saw the difference in his velocity and movement increases between being a starter at Bowie and a reliever in Baltimore. As Drungo pointed out, Zach is a two pitch pitcher who throws one 90% of the time. He isn't stretched out at all, hasn't thrown his change up in a few years, and may not be in the shape he'd need to be in to start. Just my 2 cents...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People need to remember that when Zach was a starter, his fastball averaged 92 - not the 96 it averages as a short spurt reliever. Jim Johnson got the same kind of velocity jump as he adjusted to relief. I saw the difference in his velocity and movement increases between being a starter at Bowie and a reliever in Baltimore. As Drungo pointed out, Zach is a two pitch pitcher who throws one 90% of the time. He isn't stretched out at all, hasn't thrown his change up in a few years, and may not be in the shape he'd need to be in to start. Just my 2 cents...

While you make several key points, which are valid.

I don't think moving to relieving did anything to improve his "out" pitch.

Wallace worked hard with Britton on his command, his ability to paint both sides of the paint, skip the 4 seam, and just rely on the 2 seam fast and mastering the slider did wonders for him.

I think would be a better SP now, but, I do not believe he would be an elite SP, like he is now, an elite closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Vlad Jr and Burnes....my priorities. Then you can trade Mayo for MMiller.
    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...