Jump to content

What? Orioles say if there is a 3-way tie for 2 wild-cards, they want to risk it on 1 game?


Rojo13

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If you are one of the two WC teams you play one G to get to the ALDS. So in this situation you play one home game to get to the ALDS, right? If DET wins v TOR we play them at home to play TOR?

The loser of first game has to win next 2 just to get to ALDS. Either way a team has to win 2 games to get to ALDS. You have to win to advance to WC game and then win that game to go to ALDS.

If 3 way tie now. I think that is what you are asking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So at this point the Orioles will play in at least 1 of:

--the WC game; or

--a home play-in game.

As they have selected, they cannot play a road play-in game because:

--a 2-way tie with Det will be in Baltimore

--they selected 1 home game in the even to a 3-way tie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So at this point the Orioles will play in at least 1 of:

--the WC game; or

--a home play-in game.

As they have selected, they cannot play a road play-in game because:

--a 2-way tie with Det will be in Baltimore

--they selected 1 home game in the even to a 3-way tie

Correct. Any play in game would be a home game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if there's a better way to handle it, though. Unless you want to rely on head to head matchups to decide who's in/who's out?

Why not just use the normal three-way tiebreaker and just forget about the Wild Card game?

? If Club 1 has a better record against Clubs 2 and 3, and Club 2 has a better record against Club 3, then Club 1 chooses its designation, followed by Club 2.

? If Club 1 has a better record against Clubs 2 and 3, and Club 2 and 3 have identical records against one another, then Club 1 chooses its designation. Clubs 2 and 3 would follow the two-Club tiebreak rules to break their tie to pick the next designation.

? If Club 1 and 2 have identical records against one another, but each has a better record against Club 3, then Clubs 1 and 2 would follow the two-Club tiebreak rules to break their tie to pick the first designation.

Club 1- Blue Jays 14-12 record against Orioles and Tigers, winning record against O's

Club 2- Orioles 14-12 record against Blue Jays and Tigers, losing record against Jays

Club 3- Tigers 5-9 record against Blue Jays and Orioles

Game 1- Orioles host Tigers on Tuesday

Game 2- Winner of Orioles/Tigers game plays Blue Jays for right to go to ALDS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd imagine the Blue Jays had the first say.

Jays have the season series over the Tigers (4-3) and Orioles (10-9).

Yeah but the Orioles had second say. It makes no sense for them to choose a single elimination over a double elimination. It's simple odds. It's a lot easier to go 2-1 than 2-0. This move smells of the Angelos family being cheap or desperate for revenue and wanting the sure home game instead of risking the Orioles playing two or three road games and then getting eliminated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it's a simple as wanting to assure that the home fans get to see a playoff game.

That still doesn't make much sense because if the Orioles beat the Blue Jays in Toronto, they'll end up hosting the WC game anyway. So if Buck and Orioles management decided to make this move because they want the home fans to see a playoff game, it's also sending a message to the players that they don't have much confidence they'll be able to win in Toronto. Anyway, I hope Gausman wins tomorrow and makes this all a moot point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, I think everyone is missing the real point. #1 The Orioles play badly in Toronto. At Toronto the Orioles are 4-7 and in Camden Yards they are 6-3 (There was one tie and I missed a game somewhere). The road to the ALDS goes through the Blue Jays and it makes more sense to play them at home than away. #2 At this time of year everybody is tired and it is not a good idea to play two away games in different cities and then immediately start the ALDS away to Texas. That would probably be 3 away games in a row with travel between each one. Why be worn out? #3 the Orioles are short on starters and also depend upon their bullpen. They would want to use Tillman and the new Urbaldo as many times as they can. Fewer games with more time between games helps this. Also, the bullpen is a strength and might get wornout with 3 do-or-die games in a row. #4 I broke the piggy bank and have WC tickets for section 40 :laughlol: :hearts: :thumbsup1: :2yay-thumb: that I can't sell on Stub Hub.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if I'm reading this correctly, we're in the "playoffs" regardless of what happens today on the field, right?

The worst we can be is 88-74, which is the best the Tigers can be after today and their makeup game tomorrow.

So we'll either play in Toronto on Tuesday, or in Baltimore on Wednesday, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I can't find the article right now, but I recall reading a while back that there was some evidence that hitting tons of home runs correlates with beating your pythagorean expectation.  That's one of the reasons why the early-mid 2010s Orioles teams with prime Chris Davis frequently beat our expected win totals.  Since we're at or close to the stabilization rate for a lot of HR/power numbers I don't think the conclusion here is that our style of play is unsustainable.   Also, offense around the league is in the absolute gutter, so the runs we're able to score are pretty meaningful.
    • Then again, a game with all three of them homering would be sweet! (Bonus question: which outcome is more likely?)
    • I appreciate that he’s not flipping coins, and I know he has a reason for what he does, but a lot of the time, his reasoning is objectively bad. And that’s not really a source of debate. Just like Buck had a reason for saving Britton…but it was a really bad reason. any opinion, by definition, is debatable. A individual decision can be objectively good or bad whether or not it actually succeeds. Overall, most of the time we can give him the benefit of the doubt, but there have been lots of glaring bad decisions. I’ve mentioned Ned Yost. Even the folks at Royals review thought he was an idiot, but he had a splendid team that worked really well for a couple seasons.  
    • He's young and has a very boisterous personality. This funk literally started the day he was crowned player of the week. He's trying too hard and pressing to get back to / repeat that performance.  Another learning experience. Hopefully he locks in soon and levels that mentality out. I also think Jackson being sent down has probably made him feel pressured as well. They seemed to be pretty close. The culmination of those things just screams trying too hard to me 
    • Okay, I am going to lay into Cowser a bit here.  In the majors, a runner on 3B with less than two outs is advanced slightly more than half the time.  A runner on 2B with nobody out also is advanced a little more than half the time.   Cowser has had the most opportunities with a runner on 3B and less than two out of anyone on the team, and he’s 4 for 14 (28.6%) in those situations.  He’s also had the most opportunities with a runner on second and nobody out, and has advanced the runner only 3 times in 9 opportunities.   In RISP situations, he’s hitting .222/.250/.417.   In Late & Close situations, he’s hitting .095/.130/.238.  In high leverage situations, he’s hitting .048/.046/.095.    Honestly, right now he’s about the last guy I want to see up in an important situation.  And that’s ridiculous for a guy who’s hitting .250/.331/.500 overall.  He’s got to get his head screwed on straight when it matters most.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...