Jump to content

Duquette Future


Deadwood Fan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply

One reason could be his performance. Angelos may want to move in a new direction, it may be time to move on from giving away young cheap players for older, much more expensive, lesser players. Angelos may notice that no one on the planet could have possibly put together a lesser rotation. 

Miley, Ubaldo, Tillman, Hellickson wouldn't start for anyone we are trying to catch in the playoff race. Ed Rod, Bridwell, Davies, Brault, Hader, Miranda, Jake, & two first round picks is a steep price to pay for absolutely nothing on this roster. The good news is, Angelos may be able to watch 6 of them in the playoffs & first round picks aren't important. 

9 cheap assets & Strop all given away for Angelos to have the opportunity to pay guys like Miley, Baldo, & Gallardo a lot of money. I bet a lot of those teams wish they could trade back with us, but no can do, Dan got ya. 

Oh yeah, and now Dan wants Peter to sign off on giving something else away for a Miguel Dan let go. I wager that doesn't sound so good to ownership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Cumberbundy said:

One reason could be his performance. Angelos may want to move in a new direction, it may be time to move on from giving away young cheap players for older, much more expensive, lesser players. Angelos may notice that no one on the planet could have possibly put together a lesser rotation. 

Miley, Ubaldo, Tillman, Hellickson wouldn't start for anyone we are trying to catch in the playoff race. Ed Rod, Bridwell, Davies, Brault, Hader, Miranda, Jake, & two first round picks is a steep price to pay for absolutely nothing on this roster. The good news is, Angelos may be able to watch 6 of them in the playoffs & first round picks aren't important. 

9 cheap assets & Strop all given away for Angelos to have the opportunity to pay guys like Miley, Baldo, & Gallardo a lot of money. I bet a lot of those teams wish they could trade back with us, but no can do, Dan got ya. 

Oh yeah, and now Dan wants Peter to sign off on giving something else away for a Miguel Dan let go. I wager that doesn't sound so good to ownership.

Angelos is no expert to influence any of the acting GMs decisions who've come before Duquette. That hasn't changed since he hired Dan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a chance in hell Angelos fires Duquette with 1 year remaining on his contract (same w/ Showalter).

I'd like to see Duquette let go. But mainly because the rebuild should have started before this season started. Or before the trade deadline.

Not at the end of next year...which appears to be the trajectory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LookitsPuck said:

Not a chance in hell Angelos fires Duquette with 1 year remaining on his contract (same w/ Showalter).

I'd like to see Duquette let go. But mainly because the rebuild should have started before this season started. Or before the trade deadline.

Not at the end of next year...which appears to be the trajectory.

So Peter gave Dan the go ahead to rebuild? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eddie83 said:

So Peter gave Dan the go ahead to rebuild? 

I have no idea. 

I'm talking about wishful thinking. I'd like someone manning the helm that gives me confidence in a rebuild. Not a guy like Duquette who seemingly goes into every offseason without much of a plan. Well, unless that plan is "Take job for Blue Jays". Or "Acquire random scrub starter for 1st round draft pick". :shrug:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cumberbundy said:

One reason could be his performance. Angelos may want to move in a new direction, it may be time to move on from giving away young cheap players for older, much more expensive, lesser players. Angelos may notice that no one on the planet could have possibly put together a lesser rotation. 

Miley, Ubaldo, Tillman, Hellickson wouldn't start for anyone we are trying to catch in the playoff race. Ed Rod, Bridwell, Davies, Brault, Hader, Miranda, Jake, & two first round picks is a steep price to pay for absolutely nothing on this roster. The good news is, Angelos may be able to watch 6 of them in the playoffs & first round picks aren't important. 

9 cheap assets & Strop all given away for Angelos to have the opportunity to pay guys like Miley, Baldo, & Gallardo a lot of money. I bet a lot of those teams wish they could trade back with us, but no can do, Dan got ya. 

Oh yeah, and now Dan wants Peter to sign off on giving something else away for a Miguel Dan let go. I wager that doesn't sound so good to ownership.

I think you are overestimating Angelos' baseball IQ,  He no doubt has/had a brilliant legal mind, but he seems to be in a special ed class for baseball knowledge.  No interest in international talent (over 1/3 of MLB players and top 8 prospects), emphasis on HR over complete baseball players, no working plan to develop starting pitchers, etc.  don't show he has much baseball intelligence.  I think that if Angelos fires DD, he is replaced by Brady. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better be careful what you wish for. 

Angelos hired Syd Thrift who had no business running a team at that stage in his career.  

Then we had the co-GM approach of Beattie- Flanny then Flanny-Jim Duquette. Flanny had no prior Front Office experience.  

Until MacPhail was brought in there was no real clear plan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...