Jump to content

Jones' ejection


Frobby

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It's 17 inches from the front of the plate to the point in the back.    I question how far a ball can move in that distance, taking approximately 1/100th of a second to do it.

A lot. 

Quote

For a pitch released at 90 mph at a vertical release angle of -1 degrees, the ball will drop almost two inches over the course of that extra 1.4 feet of home plate; certainly enough drop for a pitch to fall into the strike zone.

--Eric Lang, Analyzing the Strike Zone as a Three-Dimensional Volume

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply
41 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It's 17 inches from the front of the plate to the point in the back.    I question how far a ball can move in that distance, taking approximately 1/100th of a second to do it.

I can't give you a quantitative answer, but if I see any data I'll pass it along.

A couple of things to keep in mind. In that 17 inches a ball can break from side to side and can drop. In fact, every pitch drops as it travels through the zone (unless it's thrown from down under). Some breaking pitches drop many inches while in the vicinity of that 17 inches.

Second, an inch, and probably less, can be significant in determining whether a pitch is a strike. 

One different point that goes to umpiring rather than pitch tracking.  I don't see how an umpire, with his eyes a few feet behind and maybe five feet above the front edge of the plate, can estimate with any precision where that edge is when a pitch flies over it. (That, in part, is why I figured umpires try to call strikes from either the full flight of the ball or the closest part of that flight.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, thezeroes said:

Not having heard the entire exchange between player and umpire, I have a difficult issue getting to the point of blame.  I also find it encouraging that at least ONE player has the ability to question a homeplate umpires decision for a change.  I have seen several times that Chris Davis was "Rung Up" on a close call that had been going the other way all night and yet he just bangs the bat off his shoe and walks away.  Boston, New York and Toronto have made a living with their players questioning Umpires on ALL close calls at the plate.

Well that was the grand total of the second time in his major league career that an umpire has had to endure just so much insult and verbal abuse from Adam Jones that he just had to toss him.  Give me a break.  That young twerp rookie umpire had rabbit ears, just like Jim Palmer said.    I have no problem with who to blame.   See the previous sentence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, tntoriole said:

Maybe he needed a rest.  

Reminds me of the story of a game back in the early 1900's. Player needed to get on a train (or maybe plane?) to make it to his destination, but wouldn't make it if he played the scheduled game. So in a pregame arrangement with the home plate umpire, he argued the first called strike in his at-bat in the top of the first and was "thrown out" of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NickM21 said:

Reminds me of the story of a game back in the early 1900's. Player needed to get on a train (or maybe plane?) to make it to his destination, but wouldn't make it if he played the scheduled game. So in a pregame arrangement with the home plate umpire, he argued the first called strike in his at-bat in the top of the first and was "thrown out" of the game.

Or of Bull Durham where Crash Davis guarantees his teammates a much needed rest by getting a rainout when he turns the sprinklers on the field all night long before the game the next day...lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

Well that was the grand total of the second time in his major league career that an umpire has had to endure just so much insult and verbal abuse from Adam Jones that he just had to toss him.  Give me a break.  That young twerp rookie umpire had rabbit ears, just like Jim Palmer said.    I have no problem with who to blame.   See the previous sentence. 

Any time the umpire chases the player to prolong the argument, I shift the blame to the umpire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Natty said:

Can't a blooper ball pitch or very good slow curve, cross the front of the plate in the strike zone and still hit the back of the plate? 

I got that! Full windup. You release the ball behind your back and then complete the throwing motion. Eephus pitch ++++++!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...