Jump to content

Oriole Draft Primer: #11, #37, and my top 50 draft prospects


Luke-OH

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply
40 minutes ago, Pheasants said:

Can sports today has us taking Shane McClanahan pitcher from South Florida. What do you think of him?

He just missed my top 11, he'll be in the next edition. Huge stuff, best FB in the draft, 100 from the left side. Plenty of risk though, control issues, tommy john survivor, smaller frame. A lot of relief risk for this early in the draft, but might be the highest upside college arm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jonathan India seems like a safe pick.  Average or better skills across the board.  Advanced hitter.  Has the glove for 3B and potentially SS.  I would be happy with that pick. 

LHP Ryan Rolison (Ole Miss) is another one I like and seems like an Orioles kind of pick.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We’ve had pretty good success with pitchers in rounds 2-8ish. College and High School. See Delmarva and Frederick. 

I say stay with that theory. Don’t blow the whole draft budget on a first round overslot. Spread out the money and take the most lotto tickets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChuckS said:

Jonathan India seems like a safe pick.  Average or better skills across the board.  Advanced hitter.  Has the glove for 3B and potentially SS.  I would be happy with that pick. 

LHP Ryan Rolison (Ole Miss) is another one I like and seems like an Orioles kind of pick.  

India is pretty safe I think.

Rolison is more of a 20-30 overall guy for me, there is some upside, he's a Soph., good LH velocity, plus curveball. Might take above slot, depending on where he goes, although at 11 slot would probably do it.

The concern for me is RHB get a long look, the changeup needs work, and the command needs work. That's enough risk to push him out of the first half of the first round for me.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/23/2018 at 5:45 AM, Luke-OH said:

New article up this morning, in which I list my personal 11 favorite draft prospects with notes and video as well as discuss briefly strategy and players likely to be available at the spot.

http://www.orioleshangout.com/2018/05/23/orioles-draft-primer-the-first-round/

This thread may get moved to the Amateur Draft sub-forum eventually, but I wanted to put it here first for exposure and discussion.

What wonderful work. Gilbert or Liberatore it is for me then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

India is pretty safe I think.

Rolison is more of a 20-30 overall guy for me, there is some upside, he's a Soph., good LH velocity, plus curveball. Might take above slot, depending on where he goes, although at 11 slot would probably do it.

The concern for me is RHB get a long look, the changeup needs work, and the command needs work. That's enough risk to push him out of the first half of the first round for me.

 

I read an analysis of India and it said that his first two years were 'pedestrian', but this year he is one of the best hitters in college. Does it happen often that a guy is ordinary and then becomes exceptional?

I keep thinking of average major leaguers who have a great season in their contract years, and then go back to being average after getting their big contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love Madrigal, but that seems unlikely. For me, I think there is a decent shot that the O's take Nolan Gorman if he is available. Our track record recently favors recognizing and developing bats, and he has legit impact power. After that, I think they will look strongly at HS RHP's Carter Stewart and Ethan Hankins, if they are available and Gorman is not. The LHP Weathers is an outside shot too, especially if they go underslot.

A note about Gilbert and Stetson. Cory Kluber also went to Stetson, not just DeGrom. Personally, not a fan of taking college juniors displaying a big drop in velo and effectiveness. That scenario reminds me of Sedlock. That is a risky profile for the #11 pick when you can get one of the other three I mentioned. Not sure what the deal is with Mize, but everything I read says he is 1-1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jammer7 said:

I would love Madrigal, but that seems unlikely. For me, I think there is a decent shot that the O's take Nolan Gorman if he is available. Our track record recently favors recognizing and developing bats, and he has legit impact power. After that, I think they will look strongly at HS RHP's Carter Stewart and Ethan Hankins, if they are available and Gorman is not. The LHP Weathers is an outside shot too, especially if they go underslot.

A note about Gilbert and Stetson. Cory Kluber also went to Stetson, not just DeGrom. Personally, not a fan of taking college juniors displaying a big drop in velo and effectiveness. That scenario reminds me of Sedlock. That is a risky profile for the #11 pick when you can get one of the other three I mentioned. Not sure what the deal is with Mize, but everything I read says he is 1-1.

I like Weathers, he’s just outside of my top 11. Hankins is a weird case, he was amazing last summer but his stuff has backed up big time this spring (velocity and breaking ball quality) and supposedly the medicals are fairly clean, which presents quite the mystery, someone will take the risk, but 11 is too early for that IMO. I’m not a Gorman fan, I think there is a risk he just doesn’t hit and if I’m going to draft a HS guy with a maxed body, I want one who is performing, not struggling to deal with guys pitching around him. He’s a late first guy for me.

As far as the Sedlock comparison, it doesn’t apply at all for me. Gilbert is a lower effort guy with a cleaner delivery, his velocity did decrease but has increased as the college season progressed, and he’s been more effective than ever. Sedlock didn’t lose velocity in college, the red flag with him was he had a huge jump in workload going from reliever to starter. The closest Sedlock comp (meaning similar concerns rather than build or stuff) in this draft is Roberts from Wake Forest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, panick said:

I read an analysis of India and it said that his first two years were 'pedestrian', but this year he is one of the best hitters in college. Does it happen often that a guy is ordinary and then becomes exceptional?

I keep thinking of average major leaguers who have a great season in their contract years, and then go back to being average after getting their big contracts.

India added strength to his frame, that’s the biggest cause for the breakout, although he’s probably not as good as his current batting line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

India is pretty safe I think.

Rolison is more of a 20-30 overall guy for me, there is some upside, he's a Soph., good LH velocity, plus curveball. Might take above slot, depending on where he goes, although at 11 slot would probably do it.

The concern for me is RHB get a long look, the changeup needs work, and the command needs work. That's enough risk to push him out of the first half of the first round for me.

 

I hate safe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, panick said:

I read an analysis of India and it said that his first two years were 'pedestrian', but this year he is one of the best hitters in college. Does it happen often that a guy is ordinary and then becomes exceptional?

I keep thinking of average major leaguers who have a great season in their contract years, and then go back to being average after getting their big contracts.

I agree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/23/2018 at 6:21 PM, Luke-OH said:

Practically zero.

I see the concern, but both the hitch and the inconsistent load of his back hip are relatively easy fixes IMO. I think the early transfer and weak transfer are both caused by him failing to properly load his weight on his back hip.

He's performed against the very best prep competition and while the issues raise the risk profile, the reward could be quite high which is why I see him that highly. I noted that there are some lower risk options (India being one of them).

Very true, I suppose it could be worth the risk looking at the state of things.  And he has the glove and the arm to stay at short long term?  He certainly looks like he has the build

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, joelala said:

Very true, I suppose it could be worth the risk looking at the state of things.  And he has the glove and the arm to stay at short long term?  He certainly looks like he has the build

Yeah, I think the consensus is that he has a great chance to stick at SS.

Not to get ahead of myself (this info is coming in my next article), but perhaps my favorite HS SS is Jeremiah Jackson. My confidence level in him is much lower (which is why he's ranked lower), because he doesn't have the same performance history as Turang and he was a 3rd/4th round type coming into the spring and has improved significantly. He has a Lindor-like frame, smooth hands and transfer, he had a pushy swing last summer, but has clearly added strength and transformed his swing. He joins the list of 4 or 5 guys who I'd be very happy if the O's could grab at 37.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

I like Weathers, he’s just outside of my top 11. Hankins is a weird case, he was amazing last summer but his stuff has backed up big time this spring (velocity and breaking ball quality) and supposedly the medicals are fairly clean, which presents quite the mystery, someone will take the risk, but 11 is too early for that IMO. I’m not a Gorman fan, I think there is a risk he just doesn’t hit and if I’m going to draft a HS guy with a maxed body, I want one who is performing, not struggling to deal with guys pitching around him. He’s a late first guy for me.

As far as the Sedlock comparison, it doesn’t apply at all for me. Gilbert is a lower effort guy with a cleaner delivery, his velocity did decrease but has increased as the college season progressed, and he’s been more effective than ever. Sedlock didn’t lose velocity in college, the red flag with him was he had a huge jump in workload going from reliever to starter. The closest Sedlock comp (meaning similar concerns rather than build or stuff) in this draft is Roberts from Wake Forest.

For the past month of the season, Hankins actually was back to form according to several reports. He may not be there when we pick.

Gorman has hit quite well for years, and against quality pitching. I have seen it. His travel team gets every teams best shot, and he was dominant. He looks like he has made some changes to just hit bombs for his draft status. If you have not seen it yet, try to get some video from early summer 2017 and before. I have been told (by some who know him well) that he is pressing some and that most scouts have faith in his track record. He is not a redux of Billy Rowell. :D

And I did not mean to comp Gilbert with Sedlock. They are quite different as you said. Its just with his performance this spring, I would be more comfortable taking Gilbert around #15-25. Sedlock was #27 in 2016 due to concerns about his overuse. I agree with you on their differences. I would be OK with Gilbert. For me, I would like to get a college guy who can be a TOR starter at #11. I'm not sold he is better than a 3. Obviously, we disagree just a bit. Maybe he has a lower number to sign and that allows them to go overslot at #37 or later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Another successful all Oriole grid, 36 rarity points:
    • He was allowed to face LHP.  My post wasn’t disagreeing with your post.  I was saying that not only did we let him face LHP, we let him do so despite not having much success against LHP.  I was pushing back against the narrative that we needlessly platooned Cowser.  Not only did we not platoon him, there is a reasonable argument that we should have platooned more than we did. We needed to play one of Mullins and Cowser in CF. Cowser mostly got the call vs. LHP because he was much better against LHP in the first half of the year, but this flipped in the second half.
    • From Adley to Basallo, I think Elias has eight Bats I hope we get to see all take 600 PA simultaneously some season. Adley was born in 1998, and until he arrived Elias Orioles baseball was bad by design.    For flavor, leaders of those teams like 1994-1997 births Mullins, Santander, Hays and Mountcastle are all between 10th and 20th among bats born their year.   Your team might be drafting Jackson Holliday if they are your club's best players in a rebuild, unless you have great pitching, which...haha, we know Elias' game. MLB Baseball is mostly played by guys 24-32.    286 batters cleared 300 PA in 2024 - about 12% were 33 and up by Fangraphs seasonal age assignments, about 8% were 23 and down. This is just a once a year post, but looking at Bats born from Adley's 1998 to Basallo's 2004, here's how the Orioles achievements compare with MLB's best by rWAR. 1998 - Adley is 4th 1999 - Westburg is 9th, and Kjerstad is 33rd 2000 - Cowser is 16th 2001 - Gunnar is 1st, and Mayo is nearly last, having dug a deep hole in his initial PA.    Trivia - Darell Hernaiz one of the 3 beneath Mayo.    Noelvi Marte dead last also has a PED suspension, d'oh. 2003 - Holliday is 4th - Minnesota the last weekend he got himself out of negative WAR territory. 2004 - Basallo is n/a as Chourio alone has played MLB from that birth year.    Basallo did log the most high minors experience of the 2004 births during the 2024 season. In 2025, Gunnar enters the 24-32 range as Judge departs it.     Cowser's improvement after an off-season a story of comfort for Holliday and Mayo - can they approach his ~3.5 win contribution? Strong, young teams - doing this exercise highlighted Adley's Orioles a little younger than the Braves and all their famous contract extensions.    Acuna, Albies and Riley were all born the year before Adley.   On the AL side of the competition, Yordan and Kyle Tucker also 1997 holding up a strong competitor, though not one that is young anymore.     Judge and Gerrit hoping Soto please stays.    Soto from 1998 - you have to reach back to 1994 for Correa, Bregman and C. Seager to find anyone ahead of him.
    • The Orioles have a lot of flexibility both in terms of prospects, money and potential veterans that hold value. Vets - I could see the Orioles moving on from any of Mountcastle, Mullins, Urias, or O'Hearn. These players may hold the most potential to bullpen upgrades. Money - The Orioles will certainly spend this offseason and that more flexibility than they have had.  I would like to see 1 or 2 extensions, 1 high profile FA, and maybe 1 more solid addition. Prospects - I could see any of the big 4 going somewhere.  I really think the Orioles and Pirates match up really well.  The Pirates have a plethora of young pitchers and the Orioles have young hitters.  I wouldn't be surprised to see the two match up.
    • The hitting philosophy works. That’s why they have been winning the last two years.     Plenty of runs scoring off HR’s in the playoffs. 
    • They would probably want two of Mayo, Basallo, Holliday, and Kjerstad, plus other pieces (likely at least one good pitching prospect, so someone like Povich or McDermott), for both Crochet and Robert.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...