Jump to content

What do we think of Dylan Bundy?


Barnaby Graves

Recommended Posts

Amidst this absolute trash fire of a season, Bundy has been a respectable starting pitcher at the age of 25.  He is a rigorous worker and physical specimen.  He has had ups and downs which have averaged out to roughly an average starter so far in 2018.  Let's look at some numbers (and I haven't done this in forever so supplement my work with your own input please!)

Big numbers: At 4.04, Dylan's ERA is roughly at his career average (4.11), and at 4.56, his fielding-independent pitching (FIP) is roughly at his career average (4.52).  But his expected FIP (xFIP), which adjusts for the league HR/FB rate, is 3.91, well below a career average of 4.56.  Dylan's home run per flyball rate (HR/FB) has spiked from 11.5% last year to 16.3% this year.  He is striking out 10.47 per 9 versus 8.06 per 9 last year, a fairly incredible jump which may be indicative of his progress or the astonishing K rates in the game today, I could take or leave that although it is very nice.  His walk rate was 2.71 last year and 2.74 this year, and that's a very solid number.

Batted balls: Unfortunately, the Orioles defense is mostly comprised of used chewing gum assembled into human-shaped statues, at the expense of our pitching staff.  Dylan's batting average with balls in play (BABIP) has risen from .273 to .295, despite a falling line drive rate (LD%) (20.0 to 16.2), a rising groundball rate (GB%) (32.8 to 35.8), and his infield hit rate (IFH%) has gone from 7.0% to 11.0%.  His rates of soft, medium, and hard contact are basically the same from last year, but batters are pulling the ball 45.1% vs. 37.9% last year.  He uses his fastball at basically the same rate (53.7% last year, 54.9% last year) though it is slower (92.2 MPH vs 91.6 MPH).  I don't see too much change in the composition of his repertoire, I think there's a fairly straight line between his issues with batted balls and the ineptitude of our dead-last defensive corps.  It is interesting to see that pull rate though, and I don't know what it really means.  Is it driving the increase in HR/FB?

Batter plate discipline: Continuing through the Fangraphs tables, we see Dylan's O-Swing% has climbed from 32.1% to 36.2% while his O-Contact% has dropped from 61.1% to 54.7%.  His contact rate has dropped from 76.6% to 71.7%.  He is throwing 64.1% first strikes vs. 59.6% last year.  He's basically in the zone the same amount.  I have no particular comment, these are all positive trends.  I think the decline in batter discipline against Dylan, and the increase in pull numbers, suggest more hitters are guessing at his offerings and pulling the trigger before the ball has left his hand.  When he has no stuff, we see him get pounded like he did against the Royals.  When the ball is moving, forget it; that's not an approach you can realistically take against a major league pitcher and be successful beyond some glimpses of blind luck.  The question I have is, is Dylan doing something to drive that trend, or is this just how batters behave now?  I could believe either one.  The whole league is swinging like this against other pitchers besides Dylan.

Conclusion: Even if we are in everything-must-go mode, I have to think hard about trading Dylan Bundy.  His earliest year of free agency is 2022.  My calculus to trade or not depends on the rebuild cycle, because that is going to take a while to bare fruit (IMO).  He's cheap and seems to be improving.  If the Orioles reload and get enough breaks, competing in 2021 is my most realistic timetable for them to compete, and Dylan Bundy would be 28.  Who knows what he'd be by then; he could be the anchor taking them into the postseason.  I don't see him falling off a cliff barring an injury, due to his physical stature, though he does have a checkered health history.  His velocity will likely continue a typical decline, but he only uses his fastball a little over half the time right now anyway.

And on the other hand, you have to wonder what a young, improving, cheap pitcher could get you, and if the return from him fits better into our organizational timetable than he does.  After all, he's not worth much winning 15 games for a 70-win team, anymore than Bedard was.

So, what do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply
5 minutes ago, Barnaby Graves said:

Amidst this absolute trash fire of a season, Bundy has been a respectable starting pitcher at the age of 25.  He is a rigorous worker and physical specimen.  He has had ups and downs which have averaged out to roughly an average starter so far in 2018.  Let's look at some numbers (and I haven't done this in forever so supplement my work with your own input please!)

Big numbers: At 4.04, Dylan's ERA is roughly at his career average (4.11), and at 4.56, his fielding-independent pitching (FIP) is roughly at his career average (4.52).  But his expected FIP (xFIP), which adjusts for the league HR/FB rate, is 3.91, well below a career average of 4.56.  Dylan's home run per flyball rate (HR/FB) has spiked from 11.5% last year to 16.3% this year.  He is striking out 10.47 per 9 versus 8.06 per 9 last year, a fairly incredible jump which may be indicative of his progress or the astonishing K rates in the game today, I could take or leave that although it is very nice.  His walk rate was 2.71 last year and 2.74 this year, and that's a very solid number.

Batted balls: Unfortunately, the Orioles defense is mostly comprised of used chewing gum assembled into human-shaped statues, at the expense of our pitching staff.  Dylan's batting average with balls in play (BABIP) has risen from .273 to .295, despite a falling line drive rate (LD%) (20.0 to 16.2), a rising groundball rate (GB%) (32.8 to 35.8), and his infield hit rate (IFH%) has gone from 7.0% to 11.0%.  His rates of soft, medium, and hard contact are basically the same from last year, but batters are pulling the ball 45.1% vs. 37.9% last year.  He uses his fastball at basically the same rate (53.7% last year, 54.9% last year) though it is slower (92.2 MPH vs 91.6 MPH).  I don't see too much change in the composition of his repertoire, I think there's a fairly straight line between his issues with batted balls and the ineptitude of our dead-last defensive corps.  It is interesting to see that pull rate though, and I don't know what it really means.  Is it driving the increase in HR/FB?

Batter plate discipline: Continuing through the Fangraphs tables, we see Dylan's O-Swing% has climbed from 32.1% to 36.2% while his O-Contact% has dropped from 61.1% to 54.7%.  His contact rate has dropped from 76.6% to 71.7%.  He is throwing 64.1% first strikes vs. 59.6% last year.  He's basically in the zone the same amount.  I have no particular comment, these are all positive trends.  I think the decline in batter discipline against Dylan, and the increase in pull numbers, suggest more hitters are guessing at his offerings and pulling the trigger before the ball has left his hand.  When he has no stuff, we see him get pounded like he did against the Royals.  When the ball is moving, forget it; that's not an approach you can realistically take against a major league pitcher and be successful beyond some glimpses of blind luck.  The question I have is, is Dylan doing something to drive that trend, or is this just how batters behave now?  I could believe either one.  The whole league is swinging like this against other pitchers besides Dylan.

Conclusion: Even if we are in everything-must-go mode, I have to think hard about trading Dylan Bundy.  His earliest year of free agency is 2022.  My calculus to trade or not depends on the rebuild cycle, because that is going to take a while to bare fruit (IMO).  He's cheap and seems to be improving.  If the Orioles reload and get enough breaks, competing in 2021 is my most realistic timetable for them to compete, and Dylan Bundy would be 28.  Who knows what he'd be by then; he could be the anchor taking them into the postseason.  I don't see him falling off a cliff barring an injury, due to his physical stature, though he does have a checkered health history.  His velocity will likely continue a typical decline, but he only uses his fastball a little over half the time right now anyway.

And on the other hand, you have to wonder what a young, improving, cheap pitcher could get you, and if the return from him fits better into our organizational timetable than he does.  After all, he's not worth much winning 15 games for a 70-win team, anymore than Bedard was.

So, what do you think?

You need to update his numbers after tonight. His ERA dropped close to a half run

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

They are not trading Bundy. If they do, they should get even better return than a rental of Manny. Better bet is to let him keep building his value, hopefully with a better defense behind him. Then reconsider in a year or two.

You'd have to think close to a Bedard like return. Outside the HRs, he's got all the makings of a legit TOR starter, with several years of control. I think you have have to throw out the struggles at the end of May given what he has done before and after that "mechanical adjustment"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Depends on the night.  Some nights are terrible, some nights are a gem.

Which means he's got a better shot than most of our guys of having a good night.

I think he was hurt in May during that stretch where he was getting lit up.  Fastball was down a few ticks. He's recovered. 

Bundy is as close to an ace that we have had since Mussina.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Depends on the night.  Some nights are terrible, some nights are a gem.

Which means he's got a better shot than most of our guys of having a good night.

9 quality starts out of 14, and two others that were half decent.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Another successful all Oriole grid, 36 rarity points:
    • He was allowed to face LHP.  My post wasn’t disagreeing with your post.  I was saying that not only did we let him face LHP, we let him do so despite not having much success against LHP.  I was pushing back against the narrative that we needlessly platooned Cowser.  Not only did we not platoon him, there is a reasonable argument that we should have platooned more than we did. We needed to play one of Mullins and Cowser in CF. Cowser mostly got the call vs. LHP because he was much better against LHP in the first half of the year, but this flipped in the second half.
    • From Adley to Basallo, I think Elias has eight Bats I hope we get to see all take 600 PA simultaneously some season. Adley was born in 1998, and until he arrived Elias Orioles baseball was bad by design.    For flavor, leaders of those teams like 1994-1997 births Mullins, Santander, Hays and Mountcastle are all between 10th and 20th among bats born their year.   Your team might be drafting Jackson Holliday if they are your club's best players in a rebuild, unless you have great pitching, which...haha, we know Elias' game. MLB Baseball is mostly played by guys 24-32.    286 batters cleared 300 PA in 2024 - about 12% were 33 and up by Fangraphs seasonal age assignments, about 8% were 23 and down. This is just a once a year post, but looking at Bats born from Adley's 1998 to Basallo's 2004, here's how the Orioles achievements compare with MLB's best by rWAR. 1998 - Adley is 4th 1999 - Westburg is 9th, and Kjerstad is 33rd 2000 - Cowser is 16th 2001 - Gunnar is 1st, and Mayo is nearly last, having dug a deep hole in his initial PA.    Trivia - Darell Hernaiz one of the 3 beneath Mayo.    Noelvi Marte dead last also has a PED suspension, d'oh. 2003 - Holliday is 4th - Minnesota the last weekend he got himself out of negative WAR territory. 2004 - Basallo is n/a as Chourio alone has played MLB from that birth year.    Basallo did log the most high minors experience of the 2004 births during the 2024 season. In 2025, Gunnar enters the 24-32 range as Judge departs it.     Cowser's improvement after an off-season a story of comfort for Holliday and Mayo - can they approach his ~3.5 win contribution? Strong, young teams - doing this exercise highlighted Adley's Orioles a little younger than the Braves and all their famous contract extensions.    Acuna, Albies and Riley were all born the year before Adley.   On the AL side of the competition, Yordan and Kyle Tucker also 1997 holding up a strong competitor, though not one that is young anymore.     Judge and Gerrit hoping Soto please stays.    Soto from 1998 - you have to reach back to 1994 for Correa, Bregman and C. Seager to find anyone ahead of him.
    • The Orioles have a lot of flexibility both in terms of prospects, money and potential veterans that hold value. Vets - I could see the Orioles moving on from any of Mountcastle, Mullins, Urias, or O'Hearn. These players may hold the most potential to bullpen upgrades. Money - The Orioles will certainly spend this offseason and that more flexibility than they have had.  I would like to see 1 or 2 extensions, 1 high profile FA, and maybe 1 more solid addition. Prospects - I could see any of the big 4 going somewhere.  I really think the Orioles and Pirates match up really well.  The Pirates have a plethora of young pitchers and the Orioles have young hitters.  I wouldn't be surprised to see the two match up.
    • The hitting philosophy works. That’s why they have been winning the last two years.     Plenty of runs scoring off HR’s in the playoffs. 
    • They would probably want two of Mayo, Basallo, Holliday, and Kjerstad, plus other pieces (likely at least one good pitching prospect, so someone like Povich or McDermott), for both Crochet and Robert.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...