Jump to content

If Andy MacPhail was the O's GM....


wildcard

Recommended Posts

just think what he could have gotten for Schoop and Gausman.

I am not saying that MacPhail  should be the O's GM.  But the difference between what he could get in return for a trade seems massive compared to what Dan Duquette got for Jonathan and Kevin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yeah, not sure where you are coming from here.

Neither Gausman or Schoop are Bedard level players.

Although I would have liked to have seen at least one impact guy gotten in return, neither player's value was going to much higher than they are right now.

Let's face it with Gausman. He's really a #4 pitcher, maybe #3 at best. He'll pitch better in the NL because they only have to pitch to 7 major league hitters out of 9 in the lineup (#8 guy gets waked a lot in order to pitch to the pitcher) but he was not going to be a guy you extend so might as well move him.

As for Schoop, he has major red flags for plate discipline and his range will only diminish as he gets older. I loved watching Schoop for the Orioles, but he was free agent next year and if the Orioles want him back after next year he'll be a free agent and they'll have money to spend (not saying they would do it).

Let's face it, MacPhail made one great trade with the Mariners for Bedard. I think the Orioles got a decent return for the two considering the fact that Orioles fans probably value Gausman and Schoop more than the rest of baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

just think what he could have gotten for Schoop and Gausman.

I am not saying that MacPhail  should be the O's GM.  But the difference between what he could get in return for a trade seems massive compared to what Dan Duquette got for Jonathan and Kevin.

You have no idea what would've happened . I remember very well some some fans were down on MacPhail calling him MacFail. I think DD did pretty good myself. Of  course I'm not down on him like some fans seem to be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Why?  The game has changed. The Bedard deal he made is an example of how teams value their own much more now. 

I saw yesterday that in all the trades made the Orioles got back 3 of the top 5 prospects. 

I think I know what you’re trying to say, but the Bedard trade was not an example of a team which valued its own. It was an example of giving up multiple chips to land a big time player. 

I do agree teams value their own now and AM would have difficulty pulling off the same trade today. He certainly doesn’t even get anything for Schoop in the final minutes before the deadline.

The valuation of team’s assets has changed the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Yeah, not sure where you are coming from here.

Neither Gausman or Schoop are Bedard level players.

Although I would have liked to have seen at least one impact guy gotten in return, neither player's value was going to much higher than they are right now.

Let's face it with Gausman. He's really a #4 pitcher, maybe #3 at best. He'll pitch better in the NL because they only have to pitch to 7 major league hitters out of 9 in the lineup (#8 guy gets waked a lot in order to pitch to the pitcher) but he was not going to be a guy you extend so might as well move him.

As for Schoop, he has major red flags for plate discipline and his range will only diminish as he gets older. I loved watching Schoop for the Orioles, but he was free agent next year and if the Orioles want him back after next year he'll be a free agent and they'll have money to spend (not saying they would do it).

Let's face it, MacPhail made one great trade with the Mariners for Bedard. I think the Orioles got a decent return for the two considering the fact that Orioles fans probably value Gausman and Schoop more than the rest of baseball.

Agreed, FWIW re everything but the last sentence--which I am too ignorant to assess.  Also, top-prospects are valued more than they were when we traded Bedard.  This is especially true in light of the cap on international signings, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Yeah, not sure where you are coming from here.

Neither Gausman or Schoop are Bedard level players.

Although I would have liked to have seen at least one impact guy gotten in return, neither player's value was going to much higher than they are right now.

Let's face it with Gausman. He's really a #4 pitcher, maybe #3 at best. He'll pitch better in the NL because they only have to pitch to 7 major league hitters out of 9 in the lineup (#8 guy gets waked a lot in order to pitch to the pitcher) but he was not going to be a guy you extend so might as well move him.

As for Schoop, he has major red flags for plate discipline and his range will only diminish as he gets older. I loved watching Schoop for the Orioles, but he was free agent next year and if the Orioles want him back after next year he'll be a free agent and they'll have money to spend (not saying they would do it).

Let's face it, MacPhail made one great trade with the Mariners for Bedard. I think the Orioles got a decent return for the two considering the fact that Orioles fans probably value Gausman and Schoop more than the rest of baseball.

Exactly. I still think KG has very good stuff, but his inability to execute was driving me nuts. A #4 type is what the Braves think of him too, although they may improve what’s there.

And definitely agree on Schoop, approach at the plate and range to play up the middle would be my concerns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wildcard said:

just think what he could have gotten for Schoop and Gausman.

I am not saying that MacPhail  should be the O's GM.  But the difference between what he could get in return for a trade seems massive compared to what Dan Duquette got for Jonathan and Kevin.

Totally speculative.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

Yeah, not sure where you are coming from here.

Neither Gausman or Schoop are Bedard level players.

Although I would have liked to have seen at least one impact guy gotten in return, neither player's value was going to much higher than they are right now.

Let's face it with Gausman. He's really a #4 pitcher, maybe #3 at best. He'll pitch better in the NL because they only have to pitch to 7 major league hitters out of 9 in the lineup (#8 guy gets waked a lot in order to pitch to the pitcher) but he was not going to be a guy you extend so might as well move him.

As for Schoop, he has major red flags for plate discipline and his range will only diminish as he gets older. I loved watching Schoop for the Orioles, but he was free agent next year and if the Orioles want him back after next year he'll be a free agent and they'll have money to spend (not saying they would do it).

Let's face it, MacPhail made one great trade with the Mariners for Bedard. I think the Orioles got a decent return for the two considering the fact that Orioles fans probably value Gausman and Schoop more than the rest of baseball.

Let's not just talk Bedard.  How about getting Hardy for basically nothing.  Or Davis and Hunter for Koji.    MacPhail could squeeze more out of a trade than anyone I have seen.  Certainly more than Dan got.

Gausman has the stuff to be a much better pitcher than what he has been.  Sucky defense and offense to support him.  He will do much better in Atlanta where he has a better team around him.

Schoop doesn't have to play 2B for the rest of his career.  He has all the tools to play 3B very well.   He was the O's MVP last year.  32 HR and 105 RBI with  841 OPS as a middle infielder.   Pretty dare good.  He is 26 and signable for a  team that wants to sign him to a 5 or 6 year contract.

MacPhail would have gotten way more back than Dan did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Let's not just talk Bedard.  How about getting Hardy for basically nothing.  Or Davis and Hunter for Koji.    MacPhail could squeeze more out of a trade than anyone I have seen.  Certainly more than Dan got.

Gausman has the stuff to be a much better pitcher than what he has been.  Sucky defense and offense to support him.  He will do much better in Atlanta where he has a better team around him.

Schoop doesn't have to play 2B for the rest of his career.  He has all the tools to play 3B very well.   He was the O's MVP last year.  32 HR and 105 RBI with  841 OPS as a middle infielder.   Pretty dare good.  He is 26 and signable for a  team that wants to sign him to a 5 or 6 year contract.

MacPhail would have gotten way more back than Dan did.

First off, I would wait a couple of years before you judge these deals using your criteria of comparison.  

Second, clearly the International slot and O’Day factored into the Gausman deal.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

 

Gausman has the stuff to be a much better pitcher than what he has been.  

You could say this about almost every young starting pitcher. Gausman isn't special and neither is Schoop. Dan has made his share of shrewd moves as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Exactly. I still think KG has very good stuff, but his inability to execute was driving me nuts. A #4 type is what the Braves think of him too, although they may improve what’s there.

And definitely agree on Schoop, approach at the plate and range to play up the middle would be my concerns.

Heard the post-trade interview with Anthopolos on MLB radio. He sure wasn't ranting and raving about Gausman. Talked more in terms of Gausman's inconsistency and their plans to work with him to improve. Said the trade was risky but they decided to take that risk to keep his top prospects in the system. Other options would have cost him prospects they wanted to keep.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...