Jump to content

Torreyes???


HowAboutThat

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, PaulFolk said:

Is this accurate? I would think you could continue to add and subtract from your roster from now until the Rule 5 draft on Dec. 13. If the Orioles, say, released three players tomorrow, that would give them three additional openings for the Rule 5 draft. Not that they would make use them all, of course.

I think your point is correct. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Your link comes back to this thread.

The deadline was to protect Rule 5 eligible players. Between now and the draft, the Orioles (or any team), can release, DFA, or trade a player and create another opening on the 40 if they want.

The Orioles currently have 2 openings. If they sign someone to a contract and take up a 40 man spot, then release someone from the 40 prior to the Rule 5 draft, they would be back at having 2 spots. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

Your link comes back to this thread.

The deadline was to protect Rule 5 eligible players. Between now and the draft, the Orioles (or any team), can release, DFA, or trade a player and create another opening on the 40 if they want.

The Orioles currently have 2 openings. If they sign someone to a contract and take up a 40 man spot, then release someone from the 40 prior to the Rule 5 draft, they would be back at having 2 spots. 

Correct. That was always the rule I recall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

November 20th was the last day that a team could add players from their own organization to the 40 man roster.   It only applies to players in the team's minors.    

Teams can add players to the 40 man roster  from outside the organization right up to the Rule 5 draft. And they can also subtract players until the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

Your link comes back to this thread.

The deadline was to protect Rule 5 eligible players. Between now and the draft, the Orioles (or any team), can release, DFA, or trade a player and create another opening on the 40 if they want.

The Orioles currently have 2 openings. If they sign someone to a contract and take up a 40 man spot, then release someone from the 40 prior to the Rule 5 draft, they would be back at having 2 spots. 

Well then, I was wrong. But it sounded good to me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Well then, I was wrong. But it sounded good to me!

It's understandable. MLB classifies November 20th (or around there) as the "40 man deadline," when they really mean "deadline to protect Rule 5 eligible players."

Easy way to remember: The 40 man roster can ALWAYS change, 365 days a year. 

25 man rosters and certain "restrictions" (Rule 5 eligible players, post season roster eligibility, 60 day DL players after the season, ect) are the only roster moves that require a deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

We could almost assemble an entire roster of guys who are better than what we have from the non-tender list.

Sure, but the goal this year isn't to be good, it's to set the table so that we're good in 2021 and beyond. There's definitely a debate to be had about the value (in terms of attendance, morale, player development, etc.) of avoiding a miserable season, but Torreyes probably isn't good enough to push us into mediocrity, and he'd steal at-bats from players who will be with us going forward.

 

That being said, I have read Yankees fans saying that Torreyes is a good clubhouse guy, so maybe he's worth picking up for that reason? I think that's about it, and I imagine it would be tough to establish a journeyman platoon guy as a mentor for the younger guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The fact that some people are against this on a one year deal is laughable. SS is pretty non existent right now in our system. We can offer him a full time position. Yeah we’re rebuilding but that doesn’t mean you don’t sign guys like this. 

The thing is, would he SIGN a 1 year deal in Baltimore? While the Orioles might offer him a 1 or 2 year contract (with the 2 year contract possibly being to sweeten the pot if they trade him if he plays well), a better team might offer him 3 or 4 years for more money as a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The fact that some people are against this on a one year deal is laughable. SS is pretty non existent right now in our system. We can offer him a full time position. Yeah we’re rebuilding but that doesn’t mean you don’t sign guys like this. 

Over four seasons he's played more games at 2B and 3B than he has at SS. Maybe he's a good utility option. At SS, he'd be a fill-in until a better option comes along; but if he's a good defender there, I'd rather have him than a bad defender who can hit. He might have a number of suitors. We'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Over four seasons he's played more games at 2B and 3B than he has at SS. Maybe he's a good utility option. At SS, he'd be a fill-in until a better option comes along; but if he's a good defender there, I'd rather have him than a bad defender who can hit. He might have a number of suitors. We'll see.

There’s a reason he wasn’t playing a lot of SS with NYY. Didi Gregorious. Not a lot of starts at SS to go around. Meanwhile, there was more opportunities at 2B and 3B. 

Just because the Yankees had Didi doesn’t make Torreyes no longer able to play SS. 

My plan at SS would be to sign Torreyes. Offer him everyday ABs. Then draft the SS from Oak in the rule 5 draft with the first pick. That gives us a floor of “respectability” and a ceiling of finding a long term solution. 

The system is barren at SS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

There’s a reason he wasn’t playing a lot of SS with NYY. Didi Gregorious. Not a lot of starts at SS to go around. Meanwhile, there was more opportunities at 2B and 3B. 

Just because the Yankees had Didi doesn’t make Torreyes no longer able to play SS. 

My plan at SS would be to sign Torreyes. Offer him everyday ABs. Then draft the SS from Oak in the rule 5 draft with the first pick. That gives us a floor of “respectability” and a ceiling of finding a long term solution. 

The system is barren at SS. 

Your plan might be fine. I don't have a plan, I'm leaving it to Elias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Your plan might be fine. I don't have a plan, I'm leaving it to Elias.

Well that’s no fun for an offseason message board. What if Elias is Josh McDaniels?  Even Sam Hinkie didn’t last with the 76ers to see his process come to fruition. We will have our answer in a few years. More importantly we have 0 SSs above A ball. Torreyes seems like a pretty good fit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Well that’s no fun for an offseason message board. What if Elias is Josh McDaniels?  Even Sam Hinkie didn’t last with the 76ers to see his process come to fruition. We will have our answer in a few years. More importantly we have 0 SSs above A ball. Torreyes seems like a pretty good fit. 

I'm glad he makes you happy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • The earliest 2025 NFBC results exist, and slotted him about the 30th best AL starter for 2025 alone's expected statistical production.    Eflin and all five guys in Tampa's forecast rotation (Baz, McClanahan, Pepiot, Bradley, Springs) fell around that level. That assumes free agents Burnes, Snell, Flaherty, Kikuchi, Pivetta, Fried and Manaea fall about half into the AL. He'll start Opening Day, but it is a byproduct of the disappointing beginning to Grayson's career and Bradish's current injury. I think odds are pretty low he is a 2026 Oriole.
    • Whoever we add needs to be able to play a solid CF or LF at OPACY and Pham definitely does not fit that bill.
    • I'm one for Tommy Pham, even though I'll take heat for it.  I think the veteran aspect of it could be key. O'Neil would be great, but he also brings more of what we have in the Ks and HRs department
    • Let's see how he does over a full year here first so we don't overpay for a SSS. He was pretty pedestrian prior to the trade.
    • I could see against tough lefties Holiday sits, Westy at 2B, and Mayo at 3B.  Or Holiday at SS to spell Gunnar sometimes too and this being the configuration. But yes, most of Holiday at 2B, Westy at 3B and Mayo DH or 1B.
    • I don't think you bring Slater back if you add Bader (unless Austin's willing to take a MiLB deal and start the year at Norfolk) because then you have to get rid of either Urias or Mateo, and that doesn't seem wise with how thinned out the IF depth is now and Holliday still trying to get his feet under him.
    • This is true. However, it is more situational in the post season. Guys are pitched to differently. You have to take what the game gives you. Home runs happen, but the best teams know when to take that shot and when to shorten up or be more line drive oriented. Home runs can be a surprise to good hitters who simply were in time and put a good swing on plane through the ball. It was a line drive that ran out of field. Hitters have to know who they are. Some sit on fast balls early in the count in a certain small box. If they get it, they take that A swing. Or maybe they sit off speed early. They may take a strike that is more of a pitcher’s pitch, or one they were not looking for. if you’re sitting fastball early, not a great idea to swing at a curveball. Or vice versa. Whatever the case, with two strikes, you have to think contact and productive at bat. For some, that approach may be sooner in the at bat, of the situation dictates it. There is no BABIP if there is not a ball in play. So luck plays no role in a strikeout. It seemed like the Orioles, as a whole, in 2024 were looking a certain pitch, and if the pitch was hittable they would hack. Even if it was just off the plate. Too many big swings, and tons of resulting misses, in key situations where shortening up a bit was the better approach. Lastly, not many of our guys are true “home run hitters.” What I mean by that is when Santander strikes out swinging at a piece ch with a big cut. I get it. That is his game to be focused on driving the ball. That is what he gets paid to do. Along with that comes a fair amount of swing and miss, and roll over ground balls. Not all our hitters should be having the same approach. Gunnar may hit 35-40 home runs in a season, but he is a much more dynamic hitter than just a “home run guy.” He is capable of doing anything on the field. He is extremely talented, and we have a few more that may fall into that category some day. There are times to adjust and take what the game gives you. Go oppo for a single, put pressure on the defense. This game is hard, but we can do better. If we are going to win, we must do much better.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...