Jump to content

Rich Dubroff: Joe Angel not returning.


weams

Recommended Posts

Just now, Frobby said:

Hunter is better on radio than he is on TV or the postgame show, but he’s a big step down from Angel.   

They really get bang for their buck with Hunter. Dude does everything, including Opening Day and emceeing most events. I respect him. And I agree he's better on radio, but woof. I'm more interested in seeing what a new guy can do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 245
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Hunter is better on radio than he is on TV or the postgame show, but he’s a big step down from Angel.   

I agree with this but TV is also the bigger payday. No idea how their contracts work.  

I thought it got a little bit better but there was always a tension in the booth with Hunter and Angel. You can tell they never really got along. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, interloper said:

The fact that it is this late would seem to support the theory that it is a legitimate retire and late call by Joe. The Fred Manfra of decisions, if you will. 

I tend to agree. 

I do wonder though if Fred was still working if Joe leaves this early. You could tell how much he enjoyed working with him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theories:

1. Late decision by Joe to retire and he's not commenting because the Os will announce it soon and he'll have a planned statement.

2. Mutual decision. Joe wants to limit games, Os want a little more consistency. They agree to part amicably.

3. OWNERSHIP KICKS JOE TO THE CURB, FORCES HIM TO RETIRE WITH ONE YEAR LEFT ON CONTRACT SOMEHOW!!1!?

Which of these seems least likely? Hmm..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Angel was never my cup of tea, really, but I get why people love him. He certainly was a "character" on air. And he's been around a long time. He does have great pipes. And while his color commentary was fine, his play-by-play drove me insane. I never knew what was happening on the field because he was too busy riffing. 

That said, best wishes to a legend of Orioles baseball. 

I look forward to seeing who they fill the spot with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

I take it this is a decision between Joe and ownership.  I doubt Elias is involved.

The article is not clear if its Joe deciding to retire or ownership deciding to be go another direction.

You really think there is even the slightest of chances that GM Mike Elias has fired Joe Angel? Is Elias redesigning the parking lot spaces, too? Pretty sure GMs do not make decisions about the on-air talent or any other broadcast decisions. Can you name one instance when a General Manager hired or fired a Ply-by-Play announcer?

To me, implying that Elias might  be involved in Joe Angel not returning is a ludicrous suggestion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bradysburns said:

Angel was never my cup of tea, really, but I get why people love him. He certainly was a "character" on air. And he's been around a long time. He does have great pipes. And while his color commentary was fine, his play-by-play drove me insane. I never knew what was happening on the field because he was too busy riffing. 

That said, best wishes to a legend of Orioles baseball. 

I look forward to seeing who they fill the spot with. 

I loved Joe - loved his Spanish pronunciation of Encarnacion vice Gary's.  Loved his homie touches.  Good man.

 

But Gary is!  ?

Angel has most recently worked with Jim Hunter on radio broadcasts. Hunter has filled in on MASN telecasts when Gary Thorne, who is returning this season, is away.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, interloper said:

They really get bang for their buck with Hunter. Dude does everything, including Opening Day and emceeing most events. I respect him. And I agree he's better on radio, but woof. I'm more interested in seeing what a new guy can do. 

There are thousands of people who would be willing to do "everything," and do it as poorly as Hunter does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, interloper said:

If you agree it's not worth speculating about then you understand why I'm upset at the OP, which instantly set the thread down this path. It's irresponsible as a mod. And typical, I might add, from Michael. 

Your last line in particular tells me you know nothing about @weams.    Nothing.   

Any "drama" here is from you continuing to get in a twist about this.   I suggest you take it offline.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bobmc said:

I loved Joe - loved his Spanish pronunciation of Encarnacion vice Gary's.  Loved his homie touches.  Good man.

I hated his weird mispronunciation of "rah-DREEEEEE-gez." He tortured the name, "Rodriguez," at every opportunity. Native Spanish speakers pronounce the name more like, "rud-REE-ges."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
    • Fair point, but these outliers are squatting like 40% more than Holliday is.  There are likely plenty of guys in the NCAA that can hit Holliday's numbers, and are in his age range.   There were like 50+ guys at this year's combine with a 10 yard split of 1.5 or better or 40 times of 4.5 or better, and 1rm squat correlates with both 10 yard split and 40 time, such that if you hit those numbers in 10 or 40, then your mean 1rm squat would be predicted to be about 2.5x body weight, which would be right around 500 lbs for a 200 lb guy.  If you want to call NFL caliber college guys outliers, I guess?  But Holliday is an MLB caliber guy, so he still fits.   Elite athletes just aren't normal, man.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...