Jump to content

Olson


Pushmonkey

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Ideally, Olson would have spent all year in Norfolk. However, the lack of pitching depth in the organization forced him to learn on the fly here in Baltimore. His changeup is devastating. If he could just get command of his fastball I really do envision him as a #3 starter. When he's going well, he's very effective. He just seems to run into trouble getting the 3rd out of innings which really killed him tonight. I have no doubt that he will end up being a very effective piece of this rotation for years to come, but the rest of the year is probably not going to be any better than tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ideally, Olson would have spent all year in Norfolk. However, the lack of pitching depth in the organization forced him to learn on the fly here in Baltimore. His changeup is devastating. If he could just get command of his fastball I really do envision him as a #3 starter. When he's going well, he's very effective. He just seems to run into trouble getting the 3rd out of innings which really killed him tonight. I have no doubt that he will end up being a very effective piece of this rotation for years to come, but the rest of the year is probably not going to be any better than tonight.

Not this season, last season maybe, but he had more than enough experience at Norfolk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe he is over thinking?

Just looking at your tag line, it appears the curse of John Maine haunts you. We got rid of him after 11 starts. In those 11 starts, he gave up 73 walks and hits in 43 2/3 innings (1.67 WHIP).

Olson is now 23 starts into his career and is pitching at a 1.78 WHIP (208 baserunners in 116 1/3 innings). There's no doubting that's bad.

There's also no doubting that the current rotation at Norfolk is Hayden Penn, Chris Waters, Craig Anderson, Jon Leicester and Andy Mitchell (none of them has an ERA below 4.62 or a WHIP below 1.43).

That means if you're going to replace Olsen, you're either replacing him with Cormier (no point for a rebuilding team), Johnson (thus weakening your bullpen at a point when we're hoping to trade one or two of our relievers), or calling someone up from Bowie to replace Olsen.

We've said time and again that we're not going to win this year and that the purpose of this year is to learn about the young guys we have on the roster. What's the point of clamoring for a young team if we're going to send a guy back down if he struggles for a month or two?

Give him the rest of the year to work with Kranitz and try to get it together. I think a lot of you have identified some of the issues (nibbling, struggling the third time through the order). If it doesn't work, pitchers will leapfrog over him just like he leapfrogged over Hayden Penn.

I am afraid, however, that Garrett Olsen pitching on a Sunday against the Angels may lead me to make my first-ever baseball wager.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hereby predict that, by the end of the year, people will like Olson a lot better than they do now. I'm not saying he's gonna be Cy Young, but I am saying that you'll like him better by then. You can rub by nose in it if I'm wrong.

For all the talk about how this year supposedly doesn't matter, and how it's about developing the young guys, it sure seems like folks have a quick hook. There is nothing about Olson's history that says he can't do what he needs to do. There is stuff in his history that says it takes him a while to get his act together when he climbs up a rung. So, I don't see why we just don't trust that he can do it again. Everybody says they want the young P's to come along. Well, when you do that, this is what you get. If you don't like being frustrated, then watching young P's grow up and take their lumps might not be the thing for you.

As for the idea that we're supposed to jerk him around and give him a new role in the BP, I think that makes zero sense in today's world. I think he needs to know that his job is to get this SP stuff sorted out enough this year that it's not a train wreck when the 5th inning comes along. I think he does know that. I don't see anything to be gained by interrupting things.

As for Ramon, I don't think he's helping any. I wish they'd take Quiroz and try letting him be the dedicated C for one of the iffy young guys, whether it's Olson or one of the others, just to see how it goes. Ramon was doing this same crap with DCab, giving him targets that required more command than he had. The thing that puzzles me is not that Ramon does this (I'm about used to it by now), but rather that DT and RK don't tell him to do it differently. If RK is studying film like crazy, which everybody seems to say he is, then he sees what's happening. I figure he should be giving both Ramon and Olson batter-by-batter instructions between innings. TV doesn't show the dugout much, does anybody know if he does that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just think that maybe he is shell shocked a bit..and going to the pen and having Cormier replace him for 2-3 starts might get his head re focused on trusting his stuff. I agree that there is not much if anything at AAA...and to rush AA pitchers might not be in their best interest (see H.Pen).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems as if some people no longer think that Garrett Olson "has learned all he can learn from pitching at Norfolk" as many insisted he had. That distance from Norfolk to Baltimore is a whole lot further than the crow flies.

His control and location are not good, and Liz's are even worse. But what do you do for pitching, rush Penn or Hernandez up here? Tillman?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm of two minds here. Part of me says stick with Olson no matter what - he doesn't need AAA seasoning and he needs to figure out what to do to adjust to being in the majors.

The other part of me says - Hayden Penn is out of options when this year is over, while Olson is not. So if this continues for another 3-4 starts, I might lean in favor of bringing up Penn, letting him show what he can do for 7-8 starts, and using Olson out of the pen the rest of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm of two minds here. Part of me says stick with Olson no matter what - he doesn't need AAA seasoning and he needs to figure out what to do to adjust to being in the majors.

The other part of me says - Hayden Penn is out of options when this year is over, while Olson is not. So if this continues for another 3-4 starts, I might lean in favor of bringing up Penn, letting him show what he can do for 7-8 starts, and using Olson out of the pen the rest of the season.

Burres goes to the pen WAY before Olson, Liz, or Penn, IMO.

We pretty much know what Burres can do. He's an ok 5th starter. We need to see which, if any, of the other guys we can count on for the rotation in 2009 and who needs to be in the bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the pen getting over worked would it make more sense to move one of the three to the pen and try someone else out...at least then DT knows he has someone that can go 4 innings of relief.

Bingo, and this is why you bring up Bergesen who has shown the ability to consistantly go 6+ innings in AA. He couldn't be any worse, and he doesn't really get burned by the longball...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bingo, and this is why you bring up Bergesen who has shown the ability to consistantly go 6+ innings in AA. He couldn't be any worse, and he doesn't really get burned by the longball...
He doesn't get burned by the long ball in the minors, but not being able to miss bats is a bad sign for a guy making a jump from AA to MLB.

No chance would I let Bergesen come up to the big squad without a pit stop at AAA unless it was an emergency. We're not there yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont know if its me or what,but it seems to me that Olson pitches fine through 4 innings but once he reaches that 5 and 6th innings he gives up 5 or 6 runs and the lead.

It's cause he's getting up there in pitches. Maybe it's his conditioning that's the problem. He does tend to nibble trying to strike guys out instead of pitching to contact. It's the same problem that plagued Erik Bedard before he trusted his stuff and just threw it over the plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I agree. He's a major factor in our odds to win a World Series. Gotta go for it while you can and keep him if we can. I generally don't like big contracts and view them as over pays. I criticized the Albert Belle signing, I hated the Ubaldo Jimenez signing, and I didn't feel comfortable with the Chris Davis extension. But to me those players did not have a solid consistent careers as a pure Ace player like Burnes does. Burnes is a player I feel confident that you know what you're getting, even if we can expect a decline by age 35. Up to that point, you're getting a perennial Cy Young competitor to anchor your entire Pitching Staff and give you a chance to win when you need it most just like he did tonight in the game 3 rubber match in a series against division rivals. This series against the Red Sox, Burnes was effectively the Stopper and got us back on track. I'm all for resigning Corbin Burnes! It's on my Christmas wish list!
    • I agree. He's been such a key part of the team competing this year. Especially since we don't have a good bullpen, Corbin Burnes has been HUGE for us. For us to keep the window to a World Series chance open, we have to at least try to retain his services. Ya never know if you don't try! What's that Wayne Gretsky quote about shots you don't take?
    • Welcome to the Orioles Hangout!
    • Michael Baumann sounded his barbaric yawp, and held the ghost runner off the board in the top of the 10th to put the Mariners in a good position in a 1-1 duel featuring Verlander, Kirby, Hader and Munoz throwing a 29/2 K/BB on the hitters.
    • Urias is responsible for a contribution on 3 runs (2 where he touched the plate and another RBI), and also played good 3rd base defense, and hasn't gotten much playing time, so for this one I guess i gotta give it to him. Although both Burnes and Henderson are certainly deserving.
    • Burnes was quoted as saying he wanted to test free agency before signing anything .  But with time between now to November, I hope Orioles would privately ask him if they could make an offer now . He probably would say not at this time. But what do they have to lose ?
    • Most big free agent contracts “don’t work out” from a WAR per dollar type perspective. But you have to overpay if you want a shot at getting a multi-year World Series window. If Burnes was great for three or four years and the Os made it to the World Series during that time then who cares about the final couple of years on the contract. The Orioles would probably be rebuilding at that point or have entered a better income bracket. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...