Jump to content

Trade Preferences


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

After 2022 season according to Baseball Reference.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/m/mancitr01.shtml

Year Age Tm Salary SrvTm Sources Notes/Other Sources
2017 25 Baltimore Orioles $536,000 0.015 contracts  
2018 26 Baltimore Orioles $556,500 1.015    
2019 27 Baltimore Orioles $575,500 2.015    
2019 Status Signed thru 2019, Earliest Arb Eligible: 2020, Earliest Free Agent: 2023

The question was (do you) think he will be a free agent after 2022.  At least that is how I read it.

I think he gets nontendered after his arb 2 season.

You are correct in the information you presented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

The question was (do you) think he will be a free agent after 2022.  At least that is how I read it.

I think he gets nontendered after his arb 2 season.

You are correct in the information you presented.

Unless Mancini goes off the rails, I don’t see him getting nontendered before free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mdbdotcom said:

Indians are 1.5 back for the wild card. 

This is part of why I think Mancini may be even more attractive to them (vs. pure rentals).  They are going for the WC, but if they were to fall short or get bounced in the play-in game, he would be there in 2020 and beyond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

This is part of why I think Mancini may be even more attractive to them (vs. pure rentals).  They are going for the WC, but if they were to fall short or get bounced in the play-in game, he would be there in 2020 and beyond.

Are they going for the WC?

I haven't seen that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, weams said:

There is no one in the Orioles 25 that will bring back as much in value as the Gausman trade did. Not even Mancini. 

Bundy would bring back as much.  He will cost less money then Gausman the last two years and won’t have O’Day attached to him.   If Bundy keeps pitching like he has last month he gets a equal or better return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So going off the other thread where the general consensus is that we won't be contending again until 2022 at the absolute earliest, we can assume that Mancini will either not be an Oriole or will be getting paid market value by that time. If that is the case then trading him would probably be best. Of course when to trade him is a different discussion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can’t see is trading Mancini or Bundy this year. If Mancini can finish this year strong and and have similar or better production the first half of next year I think we could get a nice return for him then. Same to be said for Bundy we would be selling low on both those guys right now. 

Quantity over quality and vice versa should be done case by case basis. Prospects are so hit or miss that is lean towards quantity unless it’s well thought of highly regarded prospect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jrobb21613 said:

I can’t see is trading Mancini or Bundy this year. If Mancini can finish this year strong and and have similar or better production the first half of next year I think we could get a nice return for him then. Same to be said for Bundy we would be selling low on both those guys right now. 

Quantity over quality and vice versa should be done case by case basis. Prospects are so hit or miss that is lean towards quantity unless it’s well thought of highly regarded prospect. 

I don’t see it selling low on Bundy he has been good this year.  Era a little inflated but all the other numbers are solid.  K rate good walk rate great and Whip is strong.  2 and a half years left at reasonable rate gets you solid return if he puts another month and a half together st this rate.  The teams already are looking for pitching.  Bundy is controllable won’t cost team arm or leg but is solid 3 man in rotation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

I don’t see it selling low on Bundy he has been good this year.  Era a little inflated but all the other numbers are solid.  K rate good walk rate great and Whip is strong.  2 and a half years left at reasonable rate gets you solid return if he puts another month and a half together st this rate.  The teams already are looking for pitching.  Bundy is controllable won’t cost team arm or leg but is solid 3 man in rotation.  

I just think if he continues to build off his success that next year we could get a better return because he would of shown more consistency. I think a year of showing the ability to pitch effectively on consistent basis will have more value than the extra yr of control if we were to trade this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

I don’t see it selling low on Bundy he has been good this year.  Era a little inflated but all the other numbers are solid.  K rate good walk rate great and Whip is strong.  2 and a half years left at reasonable rate gets you solid return if he puts another month and a half together st this rate.  The teams already are looking for pitching.  Bundy is controllable won’t cost team arm or leg but is solid 3 man in rotation.  

I also really like how Bundy is mixing his pitches throwing his secondaries more and with our good pitching prospects still being a couple years away I think it would be worth it to look into extending him vs trading him but first I would see what return he could garner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jrobb21613 said:

I also really like how Bundy is mixing his pitches throwing his secondaries more and with our good pitching prospects still being a couple years away I think it would be worth it to look into extending him vs trading him but first I would see what return he could garner.

He's signed for $2.8MM this year (age 26).  Let's say he jumps to $6MM for 2020 (27) and $9MM for 2021 (28) based on performance similar to what he's doing right now.  What would be a reasonable number of FA years to buy out that would be mutually agreeable, and at what rate?  If I'm Bundy, I'm not sure I want to sign too far into my 30's as it reduces the chances of me getting another good deal.  What about something like buying 2022 and 2023 for $12.5MM each?  Basically a $40MM/4year deal for 2020 - 2023? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

He's signed for $2.8MM this year (age 26).  Let's say he jumps to $6MM for 2020 (27) and $9MM for 2021 (28) based on performance similar to what he's doing right now.  What would be a reasonable number of FA years to buy out that would be mutually agreeable, and at what rate?  If I'm Bundy, I'm not sure I want to sign too far into my 30's as it reduces the chances of me getting another good deal.  What about something like buying 2022 and 2023 for $12.5MM each?  Basically a $40MM/4year deal for 2020 - 2023? 

I think that’s a great deal for the O’s unfortunately I think Bundy!s camp might feel it’s s little light. I think if the avg annual salary was equal to the 12.5 over 4 years making it 4/50 I think that would get it done but before we did that I’d like to see him finish out this year strong and approach him in the off season with it and if not acceptable move him at the winter meetings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d trade Mancini, Bundy, and Cashner. I think teams would play Mancini in the OF this year. So I think the bat will force a bigger market than what we are thinking now. Teams know what they are getting in Bundy.  He could be a real solid #3 in the NL, and on a team that has the luxury to manage his IP. Cashner would basically just be an IP eater. 

We’re not going to be “contending” again until 2022. No reason to have Bundy and Mancini around during their arbitration. 

Ideally we would get back some high ceiling guys that are in A ball, that wouldn’t require 40 man protection this offseason. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I used to think we had a plethora of outfielders ready to replace the current guys, but not I'm not sure. Cowser is one. Does the FO trust Stowers? Heston is another as far as his bat goes, but how bad is the defense if you have Stowers, Cowser and Heston? How long before Bradfield is ready? Will Norby or Mayo move to the OF? Does that make it any better. If Santander has his typical year, I would give him the QO. So what if you have to pay him large for one year? It's not like our payroll is high right now.  
    • Or maybe he just is hesitant because he knows it’s best to give up a single than letting it get by you for a triple or inside the park homerun. I highly doubt Cowser gives a crap about WAR. There is nothing in the guy’s demeanor, personality, or anything that suggests he chases stats and places himself above the team. To say otherwise is quite ridiculous at best, and malicious at worst. He is a rookie and he will get more comfortable as he plays. With that comfortability will come trusting his ability more and more. Why even suggest a thing like you are suggesting? Just pathetic quite frankly on your part.
    • On the spot?  Maybe.   Even at full health, people would have accepted not winning the division because of the pace the Yankees are on.   We have a comfortable lead for the WC so if the Orioles can continue winning at a reasonable pace with Burnes/GRod/Kremer/Irvin/Povich/Suarez.   As far as the playoffs go, there’s only a few starters that inspire confidence in a playoff series that will be available.   Elias isn’t trading Holliday, Basallo, or Mayo.  He just isn’t.   He can get relievers without giving up top prospects.  The question is, can he get someone like Crochet without giving up those top 3?   Crochet, despite innings concerns, gives you a playoff starter plus someone who’ll be here after Burnes is gone. However, Crochet is an A.J. Preller type of move, not an Elias type of move.   If Povich looks the part of a ML starter AND no more starters go down, I could see Elias standing pat on the starters and fortifying the back end of the bullpen.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after the fourth round. San Diego Padres Compensation for Josh Hader. The Astros forfeited their second-round pick for signing Hader. San Diego Padres Compensation for Blake Snell. The Giants forfeited their third-round pick for signing Snell. Toronto Blue Jays Compensation for Matt Chapman. The Giants forfeited their second-round pick for signing Chapman.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did not exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after Competitive Balance Round B.   Los Angeles Angels Compensation for Shohei Ohtani. The Dodgers forfeited their second- and fifth-round picks for signing Ohtani.
    • picks If a team that loses a qualifying free agent is a revenue-sharing recipient and the free agent signs for at least $50 million, the team will be awarded a pick between the first round and Competitive Balance Round A.   Minnesota Twins Compensation for Sonny Gray. The Cardinals forfeited their second-round pick for signing Gray.
    • The answer appears to be, yes, you can receive more than one compensation picks. Angels -- Shohei Ohtani: Pick after Competitive Balance Round B Blue Jays -- Matt Chapman: Pick after Round 4 Cubs -- Cody Bellinger: Pick after Competitive Balance Round B Padres -- Blake Snell: Pick after Round 4 Padres -- Josh Hader: Pick after Round 4
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...