Jump to content

Dan Duquette did pretty well with July 2018 trades


wildcard

Recommended Posts

To me, the Orioles only "win" if the deals result in talent that is useful when the team is good again. So, looking at that, I'm looking for players that can provide positive value in 2022 and beyond. That eliminates Villar unless they flip him this winter or next year for a good piece for the future.

Overall, I think the deals we got at the deadline in 2018 were a bit over-exaggerated at their worst, but they'll likely end up looking just okay.

I like Diaz and am intrigued by Kremer and Bannon, but don't know if any of them develop into more than a league-average option. I think Diaz will be a solid regular in the OF. I look at Kremer as a potential No.4 starter. And I think Bannon at his best is a passable option at 2B or more likely serviceable part-time player at 2B and 3B. That's potentially three solid pieces for one so if all of that pans out, the Manny deal would be a "win," though that's not to say the Dodgers lose as a result, but the Orioles' side for what was needed was a success even if not overwhelmingly so because of the lack of an elite piece.

I know Britton's injury situation at the time offered concern, but the ultimately return here is underwhelming. I have no faith in Rogers becoming anything and only marginally more in Carroll. I think Tate could be a middle relief option, but doubt we see anything of real value from this.

Villar was the key return (though not at the time) for Schoop. Carmona hasn't developed and Ortiz doesn't look like he'll make it. The real test here is what we get for Villar in a deal and what that return is able to contribute a few years down the road.

The Gausman trade was a lot about clearing salary and that was a success. Gausman and O'Day didn't pan out to help Atlanta so that's worth noting, but the player return being a positive very much hinges on Zimmermann. He's overachieved since getting here, but if he can stick as a starter (even as a No.5) I think that completely changes the return. Encarnacion is still young enough so, maybe, but Cumberland is a backup catcher option and Phllips is a middle-reliever, both fringy roster guys.

If everything (or mostly everything) goes right in development and wen end up with an everyday OF, No.4 starter, No.5 starter, a couple useful relievers, a useful role player at 2B/3B, and something of value in a Villar trade for the next somewhat competitive team, the ultimate return has to be considered a success. But assuming all the players that look like they have a chance to make it actually do make it is a HUGE leap of faith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Sure it added value, but if that value comes exclusively while the team is terrible, I’d say it served little strategic purpose.    Now, if we trade Villar for some useful future pieces because of his good season this year, then maybe we got some strategic value out of the trade.    

Even while terrible, there is value in having talented players even if they do not result in future strategic pieces. Baseball is an entertainment business and there is certainly value from a business standpoint. I know its popular right now, but I really think the "the-team-is-bad-so-sell-everything" mantra is overplayed at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

I think there is a very good chance that the O's win the Machado and Britton trades as well.  But some of the O's players will have to perform for that to happen.

The O's traded 2 1/2 months of Manny's service time for  Diaz, Kremer, Bannon and Pop.  Those 4 have to accumulate enough playing time and value in the majors to equal Manny service time with the Dodgers.  Manny helped the Dodgers get to the WS even if they did lose there.  The Dodgers did get some significant value from Manny.  Bur the O's were never going to pay Manny 10/300m.

The O's also traded a little over 2 months of Brittons service time for Carroll, Tate and Rogers.  So the O's have to get at least that much value at the major league level from those three players to win the trade.    The Yankees won a wild card spot but lost in the Division series.    However O's were not going to sign Britton to an extension or as a free agent.  Not with Boras as his agent.

The O’s knew they’d never pay him 10/300, so why didn’t they trade him earlier? When they could get better value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, waroriole said:

The O’s knew they’d never pay him 10/300, so why didn’t they trade him earlier? When they could get better value. 

Every year that Dan and Buck were here the Orioles were trying to compete and make the playoffs.   That's why they held onto Manny as long as possible until literally they were the worst team in baseball.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Every year that Dan and Buck were here the Orioles were trying to compete and make the playoffs.   That's why they held onto Manny as long as possible until literally they were the worst team in baseball.

I think the system in place, was working, until Toronto came calling and kicking the tires on DD.

Peter got riled up, and took over micromanaging the team, and the results are quite evident, or the lack of results. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, waroriole said:

The O’s knew they’d never pay him 10/300, so why didn’t they trade him earlier? When they could get better value. 

Because they thought they could make the playoffs in 2017.  And they spent to upgrade the pitching for 2018 thinking they could turn it around.   But injuries especially to Tillman and age caught up to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Well, if you want to take a pessimistic view it will be a long winter. 

I thought that was pretty middle of the road as far as possible returns; Pessimistic would be to tender. Pay the arbitration amount.  Then have an injury negate all value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Well, if you want to take a pessimistic view it will be a long winter. 

I think that the lack of participation in the Hot Stove this off season will make it slow no matter what positive spins are put forth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...