Jump to content

Dan Duquette did pretty well with July 2018 trades


wildcard

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm not sure you got my total point.  I think you are, to some degree, looking at the return through the prism of today's game.  I think guys like the O's traded were more highly valued back in the day.

Perhaps.  it was the height of the PED era, and many oldtimers hadn't gotten around to reading/accepting the findings that MLBers peak around 27, which had been published 15-20 years prior.  Some GMs probably assumed 35-year-old BJ Surhoff would be a really good LFer for many years to come.

As late as 2015-16 my contracts calculator worked very well with no age inputs at all. Meaning that most GMs signed 34-year-olds like they were 27.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Perhaps.  it was the height of the PED era, and many oldtimers hadn't gotten around to reading/accepting the findings that MLBers peak around 27, which had been published 15-20 years prior.  Some GMs probably assumed 35-year-old BJ Surhoff would be a really good LFer for many years to come.

As late as 2015-16 my contracts calculator worked very well with no age inputs at all. Meaning that most GMs signed 34-year-olds like they were 27.

A bit of a tangent, but I get the sense that GMs are over-prioritizing youth to the extent that some 28-30 year olds with some quality mileage left can be had for a bit of a bargain, especially in the trade market.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Hallas said:

A bit of a tangent, but I get the sense that GMs are over-prioritizing youth to the extent that some 28-30 year olds with some quality mileage left can be had for a bit of a bargain, especially in the trade market.

GM like copying others GM actions. 1 GM dumster drives, then many others quickly follow as they see it a way to put cheap bodies on their roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

@Luke-OH or anyone else, what’s your take on these two guys,

3B Encarnacion(21) .648 OPS in Delmarva

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=encarn000jea

SS Jean Carmona(19) .561 OPS in Aberdeen in only 25 games.

 https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=carmon000jea

Encarnacion definitely looks the part, you see him on a good day and I wouldn't blame anyone thinking he's a top 10 prospect in the system. There are a bunch of above average tools and good bat speed. It's the skills part of baseball that is holding him back. His footwork can get wonky at 3B and is the cause of most of his errors, but it is improved and I think he'll be an average glove there eventually. The big issue is a poor approach and terrible pitch recognition. He's a total guess hitter, he can hit spin if he's sitting on it, but it's a total guess style, he doesn't adjust or waste pitches and sometimes he gets caught in between which is even worse. I'm concerned that those are things that don't usually improve out of nowhere. But the ceiling is still average to above average regular, but it's a really low probability outcome and the floor is not making it out of AA. 

Carmona looked good at 2B the few games I watched and he still has quick hands and good bat speed, but the swing mechanics are still a mess. He's rarely loaded and ready to attack on time which leads to weak contact and rolling over on pitches frequently. I'm not sure why he played so sparingly, so it's possible an injury hindered his performance. The ceiling isn't quite as high as Encarnacion, but his issues are more fixable IMO. 

These guys have pretty serious flaws and neither fits the definition of hitterish, so they'll be a good test of the Orioles new player development machine, it'd be a good sign if they could get one of these two straightened out. 

  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/16/2019 at 8:10 PM, Hallas said:

A bit of a tangent, but I get the sense that GMs are over-prioritizing youth to the extent that some 28-30 year olds with some quality mileage left can be had for a bit of a bargain, especially in the trade market.

Duquette built a playoff team with guys like this. Miguel Gonzalez, Nate McLouth, Delmon Young, Brad Brach, etc. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, interloper said:

Duquette built a playoff team with guys like this. Miguel Gonzalez, Nate McLouth, Delmon Young, Brad Brach, etc. 

IMO

Duquette added players to a team Andy had started building, Tillman, Jones, Hardy, etc

The combination of actions of both of their part, is the reason, they were the best record for 5 years in the AL.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
On 10/7/2019 at 10:50 AM, wildcard said:

The full story is not written yet but the progress in 2019 with good for the O's with the players in these trades.

Machado for Diaz, Kremer, Bannon, Pop, (Valera DFA’d)

Schoop for Villar, Ortiz,  Carmona - O’s Won the trade

Britton - Carroll, Tate, Rogers

Gausman/O’Day - Phillips, Cumberland, Zimmerman,  Encarnacion, Saved 18m - O’s Won the trade  on cost savings.   

1. Villar  - 4 WAR makes him better than Schoop

2. Diaz -  O's #5 prospect. Everyday RF ETA 2nd half 2020

3. Kremer - O's #8 prospect. Starter ETA 2nd half 2020

4.  Carroll - RP Will compete for bullpen spot on OD 2020

5. Phillips - RP  Will compete for bullpen spot in 2020

6.   Bannon 2B/3B  - O's #23 prospect.  ETA late 2020/or 2021

7.  Pop  RP  O's #25 prospect.  2nd half 2021 after recovery for TJ surgery

8. Tate - RP -   O's # 26 prospect.  ETA sometime in 2020

9. Cumberland  BUC  -  O's #29 prospect. Will compete for back up catcher spot in 2021

10.  Zimmerman SP/RP  - Probably RP 2021

11. Ortiz -  SP/RP  ETA 2021 if he makes it to the majors.

12. Rogers - Probably DFA’d and outrighted to Tides where he will try to turn things around as a RP.

13.Encarnacion - O's #28 prospect?

14. Carmona - ?

Norfolk rotation of Akin, Kremer, Lowther, Wells and Baumann  will push Zimmerman,  Ortiz and Rogers to relief until some of them make the majors.

Sorry @wildcard great breakdown, but DD really let us all down. I know I was optimistic too. These deals really set us back, or at least made the road to recovery longer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Sorry @wildcard great breakdown, but DD really let us all down. I know I was optimistic too. These deals really set us back, or at least made the road to recovery longer. 

Villar was O's MVP in 2019.

Kremer has a decent chance to be a major league starter.

Tate is doing pretty well has a member of the O's pen. He is just on the 10  day IL right now.

Pop has a decent chance to be a major league closer.  Not Dan's fault that Elias didn't protect him.

Zimmerman may be a long reliever/spot starter.

Cumberland  is hitting well at AAA and may be a DH/backup catcher

Diaz is only 24 and could still be a major league outfielder.

Not bad for 2 months of Manny and Britton,  a year and a half for Schoop and Gausman and that O'Day was paid a years salary by the Braves  for 5.1 IP in 2019.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We’re coming up on three years after these deadline deals.  It is an accurate time to assess these trades. Here is a list of the trades made near the deadline that year,

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sportingnews.com/us/amp/mlb/news/mlb-trades-news-rumors-trade-deadline-yankees-braves-dodgers-cubs-red-sox/zpm9eicioqzl1l0r90ftoio3a

- We traded a top 10 player in the game(Machado) to a WS contender. 
 

- We traded a relief pitcher(Britton) that was coming off injury, but even then was looked as a coup for the post season. His “down” year of a 3.10 ERA was 2018. 
 

- We traded Gausman that was arguably the 2nd best SP available behind Archer. Huge drop off but darn. They got back Meadows, Glasnow, and Baz. 
 

- We also unloaded valuable contributors in Brach and Schoop. 
 

I honestly don’t believe that DD got the best prospect return for Gausman. He saved ownership money with the O’day trade. However, we cannot gloss over the fact that we only got back one OF(Diaz), two fringe SP(Kremer, Zimmerman), and two relievers(Pop, Tate).  Mentioning Cumberland as an MLB’er is laughable, he barely plays 60 games a year in the minors.  Bannon doesn’t even have the track record that Stevie Wilkerson does.

DD saved ownership money, but really left us in a thought spot.

These deadline deals were a failure. It’s set back our rebuild by 1-2 years at least. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We’re coming up on three years after these deadline deals.  It is an accurate time to assess these trades. Here is a list of the trades made near the deadline that year,

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sportingnews.com/us/amp/mlb/news/mlb-trades-news-rumors-trade-deadline-yankees-braves-dodgers-cubs-red-sox/zpm9eicioqzl1l0r90ftoio3a

- We traded a top 10 player in the game(Machado) to a WS contender. 
 

- We traded a relief pitcher(Britton) that was coming off injury, but even then was looked as a coup for the post season. His “down” year of a 3.10 ERA was 2018. 
 

- We traded Gausman that was arguably the 2nd best SP available behind Archer. Huge drop off but darn. They got back Meadows, Glasnow, and Baz. 
 

- We also unloaded valuable contributors in Brach and Schoop. 
 

I honestly don’t believe that DD got the best prospect return for Gausman. He saved ownership money with the O’day trade. However, we cannot gloss over the fact that we only got back one OF(Diaz), two fringe SP(Kremer, Zimmerman), and two relievers(Pop, Tate).  Mentioning Cumberland as an MLB’er is laughable, he barely plays 60 games a year in the minors.  Bannon doesn’t even have the track record that Stevie Wilkerson does.

DD saved ownership money, but really left us in a thought spot.

These deadline deals were a failure. It’s set back our rebuild by 1-2 years at least. 

 

You are wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We’re coming up on three years after these deadline deals.  It is an accurate time to assess these trades. Here is a list of the trades made near the deadline that year,

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sportingnews.com/us/amp/mlb/news/mlb-trades-news-rumors-trade-deadline-yankees-braves-dodgers-cubs-red-sox/zpm9eicioqzl1l0r90ftoio3a

- We traded a top 10 player in the game(Machado) to a WS contender. 
 

- We traded a relief pitcher(Britton) that was coming off injury, but even then was looked as a coup for the post season. His “down” year of a 3.10 ERA was 2018. 
 

- We traded Gausman that was arguably the 2nd best SP available behind Archer. Huge drop off but darn. They got back Meadows, Glasnow, and Baz. 
 

- We also unloaded valuable contributors in Brach and Schoop. 
 

I honestly don’t believe that DD got the best prospect return for Gausman. He saved ownership money with the O’day trade. However, we cannot gloss over the fact that we only got back one OF(Diaz), two fringe SP(Kremer, Zimmerman), and two relievers(Pop, Tate).  Mentioning Cumberland as an MLB’er is laughable, he barely plays 60 games a year in the minors.  Bannon doesn’t even have the track record that Stevie Wilkerson does.

DD saved ownership money, but really left us in a thought spot.

These deadline deals were a failure. It’s set back our rebuild by 1-2 years at least. 

 

Part of the reason I find these sorts of deals hard to evaluate is my lack of information about what the general manager was told to do. Did ownership tell Duquette that he absolutely had to dump salary (and if so in some minimum amount), or that it was important that he dump salary, or that it would be nice if he could dump salary but that getting back talent was the principal goal, or not to be concerned about dumping salary, or something else? And was there a limit on the salaries (or the years of team control) on the players who came back? Were there other constraints imposed on Duquette?

And I have no way to know how other teams valued the guys the Orioles traded. I am sure that Kevin Gausman had less trade value than Chris Archer, but beyond that I just don't know. 

If you don't know this stuff -- and I don't -- it's hard to know to evaluate, other than to say that as of now the returns look underwhelming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...