Jump to content

MiLB contraction


weams

Recommended Posts

MLB also wants to completely rework the PDC process to ensure that MLB clubs can be ensured of MiLB affiliates that meet their desires geographically. To do so, they want to eliminate the current two-year PDC process and replace it with much longer-lasting MLB-MiLB franchise agreements. Doing so would give the MLB clubs much more certainty, but it would also eliminate the negotiating leverage MiLB teams currently have every two years.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

Teams would be limited to 5 affiliates, 4 of which are "MiLB" teams and 1 "complex" (Gulf Coast/Arizona Rookie)

So the Orioles would lose 1 of Norfolk, Bowie, Frederick, Delmarva, or Aberdeen.

Sounds like Aberdeen would need to move up to a full-season team. Since Bowie doesn't seem to be interested in upgrading that old out o date Prince George's county Stadium, it could make some sense to move them to AA and contract Bowie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tony-OH said:

Sounds like Aberdeen would need to move up to a full-season team. Since Bowie doesn't seem to be interested in upgrading that old out o date Prince George's county Stadium, it could make some sense to move them to AA and contract Bowie.

Tony-OH I know you know more than I.

But my memory is, they built Bowie Stadium to AAA standards, because they wanted to get the AAA team out of NY. Seams to me Frederick was built to AA standards, with the idea of getting the AA team.

Did they change the standards?????

Is 1994, really that old for a MIL park?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Personally, I would hate it, I actually like going to Bowie, nice stadium, great parking, and 20 minute drive.....LOL 

Aberdeen is like, forget it, read about it online. :)

Yea it's literally the exact opposite for me.  I'm like 15-20 minutes from Aberdeen.   Free parking, no tolls.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a pretty fascinating article. MLB would save money and the talent would be better concentrated at the MiLB level. Less org guys everywhere. I bet there would have to be a waiver type of process for players coming from the dream leagues to the MiLB affiliates so all the best players can't just choose the same organization. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weams said:

MLB also wants to completely rework the PDC process to ensure that MLB clubs can be ensured of MiLB affiliates that meet their desires geographically. To do so, they want to eliminate the current two-year PDC process and replace it with much longer-lasting MLB-MiLB franchise agreements. Doing so would give the MLB clubs much more certainty, but it would also eliminate the negotiating leverage MiLB teams currently have every two years.

Not in any way surprised MLB wants to eliminate the tiny leverage MiLB teams currently have.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

The impact on the cities that lose teams?

Lost of jobs/revenue.

Or there could be three new Indy Leagues pop up, with most of the stadiums and cities carrying on like nothing much happened.  If the business case is there without MLB subsidies.

If MLB eliminated the entire Florida State League no one would notice.  I think the average game there draws 1000 fans.  It's hard to believe any of those teams would be fiscally solvent without MLB support.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Or there could be three new Indy Leagues pop up, with most of the stadiums and cities carrying on like nothing much happened.  If the business case is there without MLB subsidies.

If MLB eliminated the entire Florida State League no one would notice.  I think the average game there draws 1000 fans.  It's hard to believe any of those teams would be fiscally solvent without MLB support.

I was thinking more rural america, where they actually love the minor league game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I may be misunderstanding, but if you are suggesting that you would recall Rogers for the playoffs, then I must respectfully and strongly disagree. Baker is odd man out here, or maybe Smith, but I would definitely keep Bowman
    • A litmus test is if you'd prefer Trevor Rogers back for last guy. Tell me if it sounds crazy, but a pitcher you can sign to a minor league deal in mid-August might not be competitive with the world's greatest hitters in late September. It is fun to curate a trick pitch that works for a minute.
    • Just read two interesting tidbits - Juan Soto has battered him something like 18/35 which seemed like a lot but I guess PHI and WSN saw each other a bunch in the NL East. Also that he passed 1000 career innings.   It caught me a little by surprise he has been around that long.    Fingers crossed Bradish and Grayson in their careers can get there.    Eflin is 3rd among pitchers at age 30 and down this season. Hopping to Active Leaders to see how few pitchers attain that in this Driveline/Arm Barn era, tonight he became the 57th active pitcher to get there.     He gives us the ~162 IP we hope for in 2025, it'd go up about 20 spots.
    • Westburg, Urias, Mountcastle… Good defense, even when there’s bad defense. Westburg missed a ball that went for a hit, but I didn’t feel any foreboding, no,”here we go again” because I felt sure that that one play wouldn’t ruin the game. And it didn’t. Good pitching, even when there’s bad pitching. Eflin had never in his whole career walked 5 guys, but I wasn’t worried, for some reason. Even when Bowman had his worst outing as an oriole, I wasn’t worried, no,”here we go again” because I felt sure we’d win. And we did. Good hitting, good base running, even when Santander REALLY wanted that triple… and didn’t get it.  The fundamental baseball smarts seem to have returned, so a mistake is just a mistake. I feel really good about this team now, even though they haven’t been perfect. I really feel they’ll cover for each other, and we will enter the playoffs strong. I feel most comfortable about facing the Yankees again; they just don’t seem like a strong team, and I’m not the least bit worried about facing them again.
    • That is strong language coming from you.  The only recent guy I really couldn’t stand was Jimenez, though I sure wasn’t keen on Kimbrel for most of the season either.
    • Did you really say tonight’s game didn’t mean much? 
    • To state the obvious, the magic number for home field in the WC series is now 1, with 4 games remaining.   Would love to v close that out tomorrow va. the Yankees and then relax all weekend.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...