Jump to content

How do you like the new “three batter” rule?


Frobby

How do you like the new “three batter rule?”  

99 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you like the new three batter rule?

    • Like it
    • Hate it
    • Not sure, but don’t mind MLB trying it


Recommended Posts

On 11/14/2019 at 4:57 PM, esmd said:

Hate it.  I'm sure someone will point out where I'm wrong, but I can't think of another rule that limits a manager's roster flexibility to the detriment of the team.  A guy comes in and gives up back to back HRs, and you can't remove him before he serves up a beach ball to the 3rd hitter?  Madness, IMO.

Agree wholeheartedly with this post.  If a team has the ability to carry a LOOGY on their roster, why should it matter how many batters he faces?   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Uli2001 said:

They organic way to limit pitching changes is to decrease the number of pitchers a team can carry. The MLBPA would probably not go along with it.

Is there a reason to think the MLBPA would rather have more specialist pitchers than platoon outfielders and pinch hitters?  Besides the current makeup of the MLBPA is more LOOGY-heavy...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/15/2019 at 10:00 PM, clapdiddy said:

Agree wholeheartedly with this post.  If a team has the ability to carry a LOOGY on their roster, why should it matter how many batters he faces?   

Because unrestricted substitutions that come with 3-minute timeouts is a detriment to the entertainment value of the sport.

I'd be fine with an alternate rule that allows as many LOOGYs as you like, but they have to be ready to pitch in the same amount of time it takes a pinch hitter to walk to the batters box from the on-deck circle. 

Or you could give managers three timeouts a game.  He can use them any way he wants.  Mound visits, pitching changes, arguing, whatever.  But if he's out of timeouts and he wants a new pitcher, if the new pitcher takes longer than the time allotted in the rules for the next pitch, the batter gets an automatic ball.  And another if necessary.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Because unrestricted substitutions that come with 3-minute timeouts is a detriment to the entertainment value of the sport.

I'd be fine with an alternate rule that allows as many LOOGYs as you like, but they have to be ready to pitch in the same amount of time it takes a pinch hitter to walk to the batters box from the on-deck circle. 

Or you could give managers three timeouts a game.  He can use them any way he wants.  Mound visits, pitching changes, arguing, whatever.  But if he's out of timeouts and he wants a new pitcher, if the new pitcher takes longer than the time allotted in the rules for the next pitch, the batter gets an automatic ball.  And another if necessary.

I've been watching baseball for 35 years and the length of the game has never bothered me. 

If the length of the game is what bothers everyone else, maybe they shouldn't let the manager go to the mound and talk to the pitcher, then make the move.   Or, they could prevent batters from stepping out to adjust their helmets, gloves, crotches or whatever else they need to do before each pitch.  Maybe they should cut back on the between innings time.   Or...get rid of the replay system.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would prefer that the LOOGY could be used once per game,  the next pitcher has to finish the inning.  Do not allow more than three pitchers per inning in only one instances per game.  Implement the three batters in the other eight innings.  This leaves the managerial decision as to when to best use the LOOGY and only can use it once.  I would also disallow a pitching change for the first batter in an inning if the previous inning pitcher has come out to warm up and a pinch hitter is announced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, clapdiddy said:

I've been watching baseball for 35 years and the length of the game has never bothered me. 

When I was 10 the worst problem I had in the world was that my bedtime was 8:30 or 9:00, which meant I went to bed in the 5th or 6th or 7th inning all the time, and had to sneak a transistor radio under my pillow to make it to the 9th.  Today 8:30 is sometimes the bottom of the 3rd.

Now that I'm 48 it's an annoying problem that my kids can't stay up for the 5th inning, and I'm often asleep before the game is over.  They don't own transistor radios, and they probably couldn't pick up the O's game anyway.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

When I was 10 the worst problem I had in the world was that my bedtime was 8:30 or 9:00, which meant I went to bed in the 5th or 6th or 7th inning all the time, and had to sneak a transistor radio under my pillow to make it to the 9th.  Today 8:30 is sometimes the bottom of the 3rd.

Now that I'm 48 it's an annoying problem that my kids can't stay up for the 5th inning, and I'm often asleep before the game is over.  They don't own transistor radios, and they probably couldn't pick up the O's game anyway.

One thing about the "Old" days, between WTOP  and WBAL AM radio had the areas pretty well coverage, and at night, WBAL could get some pretty nice skips down to southern md and PA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem for me wasn't shaving off 5 minutes or 10 minutes or whatever from the total game time.  The problem was late in game where a lefty comes to the plate (who doesnt hit well against lefties), the manager pulls him in for his LOOGY.   Regardless of the outcome,  said reliever then gets pulled for the "real" reliever next batter.  Especially when there's runners on, on the batting team is behind by a run or two.   Tension gets built up in anticipation of the team maybe rallying from behind.  Then the manager does his slow walk out the mound.   Signal to bullpen, reliever starts jogging in from the outfield (usually). Commercial break and a 2 minute warmup,   Only to repeat the entire process for the next batter.  Lame.

LIke another poster said, this wouldn't be a problem if said reliever were to just run out from the dugout, with no warmup period allowed, and no commercial break.   If they want to allow that as an exception to the 3 batter minimum, then fine.  A "hot pitcher swap" rule. 

Edited by GuidoSarducci
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This actually leads me to another question - why do relievers even need warmup pitches at the mound?  They've should have already been warmed up in the bullpen.   So maybe with my hot swap idea, if the manager is using  LOOGY or other one-batter reliever, two pitchers would actually exit the bullpen - the LOOGY and then the next pitcher would come out with the manager directly from the dugout.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GuidoSarducci said:

This actually leads me to another question - why do relievers even need warmup pitches at the mound?  They've should have already been warmed up in the bullpen.   So maybe with my hot swap idea, if the manager is using  LOOGY or other one-batter reliever, two pitchers would actually exit the bullpen - the LOOGY and then the next pitcher would come out with the manager directly from the dugout.     

To get used to any differences between the two mounds.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • He makes $43 million this year. The Mets are paying $21 million of that. I don’t think we pick up the remaining $10+ post deadline for 10-12 starts. It would just depend on what Texas would ask for to pick up the tab. 
    • Haynie on 105.7, has been beating the Luis Robert drum for months on the O’s pre game show. So I think that’s why people like the idea of Robert. Robert also is always hurt.  We need a bat. Probably a RH bat to DH in the playoffs versus a LH SP. That bat is Mayo. It’s just hard to get Mayo up before September when we get the extra roster spot. 
    • Holliday went 1 for 2 with 3 walks on Friday night. 2024: .444 OBP, .911 OPS MiLB Career: .447 OBP, .931 OPS His OBP is EXACTLY what this O's team needs, would fill a key offensive weakness at 2nd base, help grind opposing pitching, and magnify the power up and down the lineup.  It's all dependent on his ability to throw and play 2B at a passable level. If Holliday starts to hit at the ML level, the question of who bats leadoff is over for the foreseeable future and we can go back to complaining about 1 slumping hitter or backup catcher at the bottom of the lineup.
    • This. We literally have no lineup holes right now, and Mayo, Norby, Jax lurk. Any trade discussion should center around the four most essential and crucial elements to O's success for the balance of the regular season and playoffs: 1. pitching 2. pitching 3. pitching 4. damn, forgot the 4th one. oh yeah, its pitching.
    • All I know is that Suárez has earned at least one more start, after today.
    • Scherzer still looks like a guy who would be a nice add to our rotation in the second half if the Rangers are sellers. 
    • Not happening. I don’t disagree, but Kremer will be slotted in the rotation.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...