Jump to content

Unilateral NL DH by 2021?


weams

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, esmd said:

I don't see why a manager could choose to NOT have a DH if a pitcher is a good hitter.  Doubt any of them will, but I think technically you could allow your pitcher to hit in the AL, correct.  Doesn't Shohei Otani hit?

I don't think Ohtani has ever batted in a game where he also pitched.  It looks like most of the time they'd DH Albert Pujols, which is kind of ironic since at this point in their careers Ohtani is a far better hitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jamalshw said:

I'm onboard with a universal DH, but I wonder if it opens the door for more playing time for no-hit SS or C types. I also wonder if/when a team will use the DH to replace said light hitting defensive whiz rather than the pitcher (when, say, Ohtani or Bumgarner are on the mound).

The rule specifically is to allow a DH to hit for the pitcher, and only the pitcher.  There is no way to DH for anyone else.  They would have to rewrite the rules to allow for a DH for the SS (or whatever other position) and have the pitcher bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, esmd said:

I don't see why a manager could choose to NOT have a DH if a pitcher is a good hitter.  Doubt any of them will, but I think technically you could allow your pitcher to hit in the AL, correct.  Doesn't Shohei Otani hit?

The DH rule makes it very clear that it's optional.  Any AL team could choose to not use the DH in any game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MurphDogg said:

Only 6 players had 100 or more appearances at DH last year and only 11 players with at least 20 DH appearances had more appearances at DH than in the field.

There are very few DH only guys in the league, Nelson Cruz, Khris Davis and Shoehei Otani were the only players who didn't play at least 10 games in the field.

10 games is a pretty low bar to set. I'd like it to be a bit more painful for a team if they chose to regularly sacrifice offense for defense. Right now it's too easy to hide the defensive shortcomings of the players you mentioned as well as others like Encarnacion, Pujols, Sano, Choo, Y.Gurriel, Vogelbach, Soler, C.Martinez, Alonso, Morales, etc. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Chewbacca Jr. said:

By that logic, the dimensions of each baseball field should be exactly the same.

I like the differences between the leagues. It is what makes baseball unique. I like the idea of pitchers hitting, but in today's game, I think it's run its course.  It's basically an automatic out at this point - and leads to some really unexciting baseball. Wouldn't be upset about either outcome.

The real separation between leagues has been ceremonial for a long time.  They used to have separate AL and NL umps, league presidents, league offices.  They didn't use the same baseballs. There were various restrictions on trading between leagues; ever notice that many, many players from prior to the 1960s played their whole careers in one league, even though they were traded multiple times?  The AL adopted the modern foul-strike rule in 1902, the NL not until '04 (or it might have been the other way around). Of course there was no inter-league play until the 1990s.  There were at least perceived differences in strategy and strike zones.

Today the only thing left is the DH, they're really just conferences in the same league otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildbillhiccup said:

10 games is a pretty low bar to set. I'd like it to be a bit more painful for a team if they chose to regularly sacrifice offense for defense. Right now it's too easy to hide the defensive shortcomings of the players you mentioned as well as others like Encarnacion, Pujols, Sano, Choo, Y.Gurriel, Vogelbach, Soler, C.Martinez, Alonso, Morales, etc. 

 

 

One option I used to oppose but might not mind is an eight-man lineup.  Eliminate the DH and pitcher hitting in one fell swoop.  Sure, everyone would get about 10% more plate appearances, but so what?  The game is probably better if Mike Trout gets 10% more impact on the offense.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

10 games is a pretty low bar to set. I'd like it to be a bit more painful for a team if they chose to regularly sacrifice offense for defense. Right now it's too easy to hide the defensive shortcomings of the players you mentioned as well as others like Encarnacion, Pujols, Sano, Choo, Y.Gurriel, Vogelbach, Soler, C.Martinez, Alonso, Morales, etc. 

Teams are making due with the rule that exists. Most of those guys would be slotted into a position at first base or corner outfield, but they play DH because they happen to play in the American League after 1972 and someone has to. Renato Nunez had the third most appearances at DH last year not because he is some 280 pound oaf, but because that is where Brandon Hyde slotted him into the lineup and because DHing didn't negatively impact his batting, which it does for many players.

That is why the argument against Edgar Martinez for the Hall of Fame was so dumb. He didn't make up the rule, he would have been fine as a completely nondescript defensive first baseman. Having someone that is able to succeed at DH is an asset not a liability.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yup, you are.  In case you wanted to erase any doubt. :) 

I don't have the numbers in front of me and probably never will. But my feeling is the O's have died more by the Paul Molitor's of the world than they have lived by the Harold Baines'. O's DH's have almost always been below league average. I'd much rather an easy out in the other lineup along with shorter games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OsEatAlEast said:

I don't have the numbers in front of me and probably never will. But my feeling is the O's have died more by the Paul Molitor's of the world than they have lived by the Harold Baines'. O's DH's have almost always been below league average. I'd much rather an easy out in the other lineup along with shorter games.

With our crap pitching, there are no easy outs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

Teams are making due with the rule that exists. Most of those guys would be slotted into a position at first base or corner outfield, but they play DH because they happen to play in the American League after 1972 and someone has to. Renato Nunez had the third most appearances at DH last year not because he is some 280 pound oaf, but because that is where Brandon Hyde slotted him into the lineup and because DHing didn't negatively impact his batting, which it does for many players.

That is why the argument against Edgar Martinez for the Hall of Fame was so dumb. He didn't make up the rule, he would have been fine as a completely nondescript defensive first baseman. Having someone that is able to succeed at DH is an asset not a liability.

Not really dumb by the premise that he most likely would have had a shorter career if not for the DH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

It'd make life easier.

You don't see the NFC not having field goal kickers and being awarded 7 points for a touchdown while the AFC still has to kick the PAT, right?  Sports should have the same rules across all leagues/divisions.  Being quirky when it comes to rules isn't really something to be proud of.

A straw man argument. The two situations are not remotely comparable. And it’s not quirky, because two leagues have been this different for years,  and neither is affected by the others use or non-use of the rule. It creates a different strategy, so when you go to a national league game you’ll see a slightly different strategy because you have different options available. I actually prefer NL although all my teams are American League.

I hate interleague play too, and the 2WC, and the juiced ball, robot umps and replay, But those are all different topics and warrant different discussions.

But the Difference between the two leagues is part of the excitement of baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Philip said:

A straw man argument. The two situations are not remotely comparable. And it’s not quirky, because two leagues have been this different for years,  and neither is affected by the others use or non-use of the rule. It creates a different strategy, so when you go to a national league game you’ll see a slightly different strategy because you have different options available. I actually prefer NL although all my teams are American League.

I hate interleague play too, and the 2WC, and the juiced ball, robot umps and replay, But those are all different topics and warrant different discussions.

But the Difference between the two leagues is part of the excitement of baseball.

Bro, you're not going to knock me off by calling it a "straw man" argument.  Everyone who's ever said "OMG STRAW MAN!" at someone just automatically expects the other side to just kowtow.  And that ain't happening here, hombre.

Yes, two situations are remotely comparable.  It would be two conferences/divisions in same sport, playing the same sport with two separate sets of rules, which, correct me if I'm wrong, is what happens between the AL and NL.  Just because when you plant your ass in one stadium doesn't mean you should have to watch a slightly different strategy than you would had you planted your ass in another stadium.  

Would the NFC benefit from not having field goal kickers while the AFC had to kick the PAT?  Probably.  The NFC would still have to employ a kicker of some sort for kickoffs and regular field goals.  The NFC would probably have higher scoring games but the better kickers would most likely be in the AFC because now PATs aren't chip shots anymore.  So it does create a different strategy because roster setups would be different.  You would have teams in the NFC possibly trying to get one guy who could punt/kickoff/PAT in an effort to open up another roster spot for a linebacker, safety, guard, etc.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...