Jump to content

It's time for the OH to turn the page


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Could this team make the playoffs in a typical 162-game season with a 10-team playoff format? Absolutely not.

Could this team go 29-31 and make the 16-team playoff? Yea, I think they could.  

 

Let's assume they finish their series sweep of the Nats.  They'd be 8-7 after playing 25% of the season.  They could probably go 21-24, or maybe even 20-25, to finish the season and nab an 8 seed.  Then you get the crapshoot of a three-game playoff series...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TommyPickles said:

Could this team make the playoffs in a typical 162-game season with a 10-team playoff format? Absolutely not.

Could this team go 29-31 and make the 16-team playoff? Yea, I think they could.  

 

Let's assume they finish their series sweep of the Nats.  They'd be 8-7 after playing 25% of the season.  They could probably go 21-24, or maybe even 20-25, to finish the season and nab an 8 seed.  Then you get the crapshoot of a three-game playoff series...

 

And then you get a five game series, and then a pair of seven game series...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/9/2020 at 10:36 AM, Can_of_corn said:

I think the team is bereft of ML talent and is merely playing reasonably well in a small sample size.  If they somehow get to the playoffs they have no chance to win the WS.

This.  Stick to the plan.  Trade anyone they can of value that is older than 28 or 29.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/9/2020 at 10:47 AM, TINSTAAPP said:

Wasn't this team just swept by the Marlins AAA squad three days ago?

Yes, but our pitching was very good in that series.  The bats just went cold.  I'd rather lose low scoring pitching duels than the blowouts from a year ago.  I agree with Wildcard, this team is improved, and as long as they play like a contender, I won't dismiss anything in a season that is this short.  Playing .500 for two months is not the strangest thing that has happened in 2020!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are super optimistic ask yourself this question. Are the better than the Rays? 

I said no freaking way. So they need to get one of the two WC’s left. The West looks weak. I assume A’s and Astros get top 2 spots. Angels have started slow. 

So you have the Jays, Red Sox, one of Cle/CWS, and Texas.  Have to finish in top 2 of that 5 team mix. I left out KC, Seattle, LAA and Detroit for now and I know they have started out well. 

My guess is one WC spot goes to the AL East and one to the Central. West only gets two teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless it's the Yankees or Dodgers, whoever wins the World Series will be considered a "fluke."  I'd like to see the O's sneak into the dance and surprise some folks by advancing to round two.  Then they can lose, and go home with heads held high.  It would be a great experience for the young guys to taste the postseason.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChipTait said:

Unless it's the Yankees or Dodgers, whoever wins the World Series will be considered a "fluke."  I'd like to see the O's sneak into the dance and surprise some folks by advancing to round two.  Then they can lose, and go home with heads held high.  It would be a great experience for the young guys to taste the postseason.  

The important young guys won't be on the roster.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ChipTait said:

Unless it's the Yankees or Dodgers, whoever wins the World Series will be considered a "fluke."  I'd like to see the O's sneak into the dance and surprise some folks by advancing to round two.  Then they can lose, and go home with heads held high.  It would be a great experience for the young guys to taste the postseason.  

I saw a BS perspective recently that 1981, featuring IIRC such perks as the Reds having the best record but not qualifying for the postseason, genuinely "counted" because it was a Dodgers-Yankees World Series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/9/2020 at 10:36 AM, Can_of_corn said:

I think the team is bereft of ML talent and is merely playing reasonably well in a small sample size.  If they somehow get to the playoffs they have no chance to win the WS.

Being negative is always easy, because there is no cost when you are wrong.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Slappy said:

Being negative is always easy, because there is no cost when you are wrong.

What does that mean?

What's the cost of Wildcard's optimism?

Also, I don't think what I said constituted being negative.  That's an honest appraisal of the team.    Not much of what we are seeing looks sustainable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate Wildcards's enthusiasm and optimism.

This season is such a wildcard because of all the variables that really anything could happen and I wouldn't be overly surprised.

Saying that, there is no reality where this is the beginning of a sustainable winning core. 

There is just as much of a chance of this team losing ten straight games as they do of keep playing .500 ball the rest of this season. 

As Drungo has point out, there are some guys who have started out this season way above their carer norms. Even if you believe Severino, Ruiz, Alberto and Nunez are breaking out as they enter their primes, does anyone think Cobb, Milone and Wojo are going to keep pitching to their current ERAs? Cobb maybe since it seems his splitter has come back, but I'm not buying long term sustainability on Milone and Hyde has used Wojo right but not letting him go more than twice through an order. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • It’s my understanding that nationally televised games are usually blacked out. Consider a free trial subscription of Fubo if they are still offering it. 
    • The Orioles starters absolutely have to do better against the Royals. You can't ask this bullpen to pitch most of the game and expect to win. Right now I probably trust Coulombe the most and Soto (which I never would have guessed a couple weeks back). Perez has been really shaky recently to the point I'm wondering is he nursing a tired arm or minor injuey. Cano hasn't been good as well and O's really need him to get back into a groove. And Akin is usually trustworthy, but only starting the inning clean.
    • I'll be working at Gate F.  If you're getting drunk at Pickles before the game and then walk through the closest gate, you'll walk right past me.
    • What happens if it rains all day?
    • For me, bullpen strategy in a short series is developing a core principle or two and working backwards from that. That’s usually going to involve how we want to pitch to their best guys. In this case, there’s really no way to game Witt. He doesn’t have any discernible platoon splits, and in fact he destroyed RHPs this year. He doesn’t even have any particular pitches he struggles against. If you have to pitch to him, power stuff seems to be the way to go — if he has any weakness, it seems like maybe it’s LHPs who can attack him with high velocity and some sort of off speed weapon (Skubal, Framber, Kikuchi, EdRod, Rodon, Sale, Gore). So maybe you’re looking at Soto and Perez there, although you really just shouldn’t be pitching to him at all if you can avoid it. Beyond him, the other “hero” is Salvador Perez. And that’s from where I’d be building out my strategy. He probably should not see a LHP all series. There’s a fairly meaningful career platoon split there (109 wRC+ to 101), and it’s been more pronounced this year (130 to 110). I would be looking to force feed him ABs against Cano (1/4 with a single), Webb (0/2 with two Ks), and Dominguez. He’s always had trouble with offspeed stuff, which means Webb might be the preferred option. They’ve faced a ton of LH starters in the last week or so, but it seems like their preferred lineup against RHPs stacks LH hitters like Melendez and Gurriel behind Perez. Melendez is awful against LHPs, so ideally Perez might be the last hitter that the starters see. They pinch hit very liberally in platoon fashion in the bottom half of the lineup, so if you brought in someone like Akin behind the starter, they might very well hit for him. Forcing them to do that erases a lot of the platoon stacking in the late innings, so you could subsequently bring in a RHP to pitch to Perez without the same concern that they’d be exposed after him.    In sum, I think the ideal attack plan is for Burnes/Eflin/Kremer to see Perez three times, then bring in Akin or Cionel to pitch to the bottom of what will likely be a lefty-heavy lineup. They’ll potentially PH there, but that’s okay because none of those guys are that good. You then go to one of the RHPs for the top of the lineup, which it seems will consist of Pham, Witt (pitch around), and Perez. Then back to Coulombe or Soto for the bottom of the lineup again.
    • I have two tickets to Game 1 of the WC which I cannot use due to work travel.  Section 352, row 4, seats 9 & 10.  Asking $70 total for the two.  Paid $205 to the Orioles as a season plan member.   PM me if interested.  Paypal preferred.    
    • Can't make game 1. I'll be at game 2...last time I was at a playoff game at Camden, we beat Scherzer and the Tigers.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...