Jump to content

Santander may odd man out in 2021 or 2022


ofan239

Recommended Posts

With the emergence of the surplus of outfielders the Orioles have I realize now Santander may be on the outside looking in  come 2022 or even as early as 2021 . 
Here is what we have 

Mountcastle LF - should play somewhere everyday . Left field or dh 

Mullins - All three positions - fast but weak arm

Hayes - great tools , needs to stay healthy 

Stewart - good eye at plate , limited defensively 

Mancini - really should not be an outfielder at this point -should be at 1b full time next season ( Davis will play depending on match ups)

Santander - corner outfielder . 20+ hr power , limited defensively 

Others : Diaz, McKenna , later on Kjerstad 

I think the best outfield we could field for right now would be : Hayes , Mullins , Mountcastle . When Diaz is ready Diaz takes over rf from Hayes, Mullins goes on bench and Hayes moves to center . This would happen end of 2021
 

santander becomes trade chip  if Diaz works out 

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could see something like this next year:

1B/DH- Mancini

1B/DH- Mountcastle

LF- Santander

CF- Hays

RF- Stewart

4th OF- Mullins (could steal playing time from Hays if he struggles or is injured)

Nunez then gets moved.

Once Diaz is up and producing (if he produces), that is when I see a real roster crunch in the OF though these problems tend to work themselves out due to injuries and attrition. There's also a chance Mancini isn't fully ready (or himself) next year.

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if they believe Stewart is for real or think Diaz will be a better player, do they move Santander for a 3rd baseman or a shortstop?

I also agree Nunez is likely dealt in the offseason, too many guys that need at bats and he's too streaky and doesn't have a position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see a few different tiers here, based on how confident we can be of who the players are. Objectively this might be measured as service time to date, but instead I'll go with the more subjective gut approach, and keep it simple with three categories:

the known quantity: Mountcastle, Santander

inconsistent but promising: Mullins, Stewart

too soon to tell: Hays, Diaz, McKenna, Kjerstad

(Mancini obviously would go in tier 1, except post-surgery, falls to tier 3 for now. And if the mix gets too crowded there's always 1B.)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jamalshw said:

...though these problems tend to work themselves out due to injuries and attrition.

We're coming into this problem during a period where Stewart and Mullins are having maybe the best few weeks of their careers.  It's entirely plausible that one or both of them don't hit enough to be major league starters.  Mancini may not ever fully recover, or may take well into next year.  Hays has never put together an extended stretch where he was both healthy and good, at least not since A ball.  Santander has looked good over the past year, but still has defense and plate discipline concerns.  Mountcastle will not hit .364 for his career, I'll be beyond thrilled if he regularly hits over .300.  Once this all washes out it will probably look a lot less like a roster crunch.

There's a 90% chance that someone not currently in the organization will get 300 PAs as an outfielder for the 2022 Orioles.  There's probably a 30-50% chance that happens in 2021.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

We're coming into this problem during a period where Stewart and Mullins are having maybe the best few weeks of their careers.  It's entirely plausible that one or both of them don't hit enough to be major league starters.  Mancini may not ever fully recover, or may take well into next year.  Hays has never put together an extended stretch where he was both healthy and good, at least not since A ball.  Santander has looked good over the past year, but still has defense and plate discipline concerns.  Mountcastle will not hit .364 for his career, I'll be beyond thrilled if he regularly hits over .300.  Once this all washes out it will probably look a lot less like a roster crunch.

There's a 90% chance that someone not currently in the organization will get 300 PAs as an outfielder for the 2022 Orioles.  There's probably a 30-50% chance that happens in 2021.

I'd be floored if the O's brought in anyone outside the organization to play OF by 2022. Remember Diaz and Kjerstad will be adding to the logjam pretty soon. I guess they aren't particularly deep at CF with Hays and Mullins not exactly taking the position.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

I'd be floored if the O's brought in anyone outside the organization to play OF by 2022. Remember Diaz and Kjerstad will be adding to the logjam pretty soon. I guess they aren't particularly deep at CF with Hays and Mullins not exactly taking the position.  

I think there's some pretty plausible paths to someone else coming in.  Like two injuries.  Or Hays gets hurt and Mullins hits .150 for a month.  Or Mancini isn't back, Mountcastle is playing first, they traded Nunez, and you have an outfield of Diaz, Stewart, Hays, Mullins... who is next up?  They're not calling up Kjerstad next year, McKenna has a .680 OPS at Bowie.  Someone like Mason Williams already has to pass through waivers to be sent down, he could be claimed.

When's the last year the Orioles didn't have some random guy get a few hundred plate appearances?  Valaika, Dwight Smith, Jace Peterson, Craig Gentry, Danny Valencia, Seth Smith, Hyun Soo Kim, Travis Snider, Jimmy Paredes, David Lough, Nick Hundley Steve Clevinger, Chris Dickerson, Alexi Casilla... Things always happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ofan239 said:

With the emergence of the surplus of outfielders the Orioles have I realize now Santander may be on the outside looking in  come 2022 or even as early as 2021 . 
Here is what we have 

Mountcastle LF - should play somewhere everyday . Left field or dh 

Mullins - All three positions - fast but weak arm

Hayes - great tools , needs to stay healthy 

Stewart - good eye at plate , limited defensively 

Mancini - really should not be an outfielder at this point -should be at 1b full time next season ( Davis will play depending on match ups)

Santander - corner outfielder . 20+ hr power , limited defensively 

Others : Diaz, McKenna , later on Kjerstad 

I think the best outfield we could field for right now would be : Hayes , Mullins , Mountcastle . When Diaz is ready Diaz takes over rf from Hayes, Mullins goes on bench and Hayes moves to center . This would happen end of 2021
 

santander becomes trade chip  if Diaz works out 

 

 

 

 

That would be refreshing.  Roch said Mountcastle will be getting regular time at 1B for the rest of the season, so that may help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...