Jump to content

Where do Adley and Gunnar start the season in 2021?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Just now, Sports Guy said:

I think this is a bit of a stretch.  I think it’s searching for excuses.  Why can’t it simply be he struggled in a very SSS against the best competition he has ever faced and leave it at that?

 

Factually correct.  But with no context whatsoever to give it meaning, if there even is any.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NCRaven said:

Factually correct.  But with no context whatsoever to give it meaning, if there even is any.

 

There is plenty context there.  
 

1) SSS that doesn’t mean anything

2) Highest level he ever played against

3) Sub 600 OPS

No other context is needed.  The only other variables that would be brought into this are excuses.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Three different levels?  Three different cities?  Three different set of pitchers?  Three different sets of coaches?  In such an abbreviated period of time?

I can see it wearing a player down.

 

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I think this is a bit of a stretch.  I think it’s searching for excuses.  Why can’t it simply be he struggled in a very SSS against the best competition he has ever faced and leave it at that?

 

I think there are two excuses, or flat out reasons, that are just as likely as any others.

1. People go through slumps. It happens all the time. Timing gets off. The feel goes away. Happens to the best of them.

2. Maybe he was given a tweak from one of our coaches/hitting systems and he tried to implement it. That could definitely be a situation where you take a step backward before taking two steps forward.

Either way, they're perfectly fine explanations that have nothing to do with his high ceiling talent and probabilities of getting close to it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

There is plenty context there.  
 

1) SSS that doesn’t mean anything

2) Highest level he ever played against

3) Sub 600 OPS

No other context is needed.  The only other variables that would be brought into this are excuses.  

I disagree. Also, he had Mono. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mono is not an excuse, but a fact.  How much it affected him, I do not know, but I do know that mono is a sneaky ailment which even people in the prime of their physical life sometimes take longer than one would expect to totally recover.  I hope it was something like that, rather than he was not ready for the competition he faced.  This franchise, God knows, needs a few breaks right now.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLB.com’s Jonathan Mayo on Rutschman:

“Stop us if you’ve heard this one, but Rutschman is really, really good at baseball. In these kinds of stories, an attempt is made to spread the love around, but when a guy is the best player at the alternate training site, he’s the best player. And Rutschman, the No. 1 overall pick in the 2019 Draft, was the best player.“

And on Henderson:

“He was the most exciting guy in camp for me,” Blood said. “The guy worked really hard and he showed five tools. He’s facing Double-A, Triple-A, 4-A pitchers for the first time in his life. It was a challenge for him, and he caught up. By week three, he had caught up to the competition he was facing and he was one of the best guys there. The older guys really took notice and were impressed by him and were also helping him. And he played a nice shortstop, too.”

https://www.mlb.com/amp/news/orioles-alternate-camp-report.html?__twitter_impression=true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...