Jump to content

Jose Iglesias traded to Angels.


LookinUp

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

It’s not the same as playing competitive games. Certainly it was better than nothing, plus it was a placeholder in case rostered players tested positive and a replacement was required. 

Honestly for some players it might be more useful than competitive games.  Perfect time to rebuild muscle memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I'd rather see Stewart at DH while the outfield starts off with Mountcastle, Hays and Santander. Mancini for me is the 1B if he's healthy.

The best defensive outfielder the Orioles can put out there is Hays in LF, Mullins in CF, and Santander in RF. If Mancini is not ready, Id go with that with Mountcastle moving to 1B and Stewart still at DH.

Mullins and Stewart are odd couple platoon mates, but I think this is the right configuration and they'll basically be an Offense/Defense one the first month or so.

For 4 of the 5 OF/DH/1B spots, I see Mancini, Hays, Santander, Mountcastle a couple few ticks ahead of that platoon from a straight talent standpoint, and haven't given up on Diaz belonging to the better of those two tiers to finish out that 55.5% of the lineup.   Maybe he's only 75-90% as good as Mullins fielding or Stewart hitting, but a possible two way player shouldn't be too much slowed by those guys, and I'd guess in the long run he outhits Stewart straight up.

The nice thing is the attractive Offense/Defense combo can still both help the team as OF4/OF5 even if that's one slot down from DH/OF4.   Hays and Mancini aren't gonna be Cal in 2021, but they are 2 of the 5 Voltron lions setting a floor for early Adley lineups (just like all these 2018/2019 SEC guys are for the back rotation/long relief) while we await seeing how good the guys on the dirt can get in time.

Down 1 late next spring, Hyde perhaps pinch hits Stewart and pinch runs Mullins for the whole other 44.4% of the lineup most any day.

On Yusniel and Adley and not giving up on 2022, you could probably sell me on the argument after not seeing live pitching in 2020 (except the same dozen-ish camp guys), why mess them up having to gear for AAA junk half the year?    Assuming you want to keep all your Not Maximizing Wins at the MLB Level silo'ed to 2021.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Honestly for some players it might be more useful than competitive games.  Perfect time to rebuild muscle memory.

I am fascinated to see what the Blip does to batter pitcher battles.   

I think I think the emerging technologies give pitchers a big edge in having been able to use 2020 productively.  The teams are curating Speed X, Spin Y, Tunnel Z - pitchers don't need hitters at all to refine their craft (I've got Earl, "the hitters will let me know" turning over in his grave there).

The hitters meanwhile....maybe the backend Bowie arms day after day were still exciting for Gunnar Henderson, High School Class of 2019, but I imagine Adley was beating up Bruce Zimmermann something fierce by the end of summer.  And I still want him facing Gerrit Cole in Week 2.

There's always the hometown tint, but if our PitchDev is plus now and Baumann/Hall/Rodriguez gained relatively on other young 20's dudes last year, I think even at the MLB level their 2021 productivity could be respectable, or with them there Orange Colored glasses, at Release The Kraken, Lindor-wooing levels.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

Noted thanks! Isn’t that equipment available all throughout the organization by now? If not that’s a problem in itself.

I don't know, but if it's still a problem I imagine that Elias has a plan to get it fixed. Those advanced tools are central to his evaluation and player development strategies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

I think I think the emerging technologies give pitchers a big edge in having been able to use 2020 productively. 
...
The hitters meanwhile....maybe the backend Bowie arms day after day were still exciting for Gunnar Henderson, High School Class of 2019, but I imagine Adley was beating up Bruce Zimmermann something fierce by the end of summer. 

I think that any MiL hitter would benefit from going against our MiL pitching at this point. If it didn't benefit them, they're probably already close to Major League All Star level players. Really, any hitter that has to face 95 MPH and decent secondaries will benefit from that. That doesn't mean I'm saying our arms are all ML arms, but they're very good MiL arms, which is toward the top of what they'd be facing if they were actually playing minor league games. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Wish we would’ve just taken the money we paid Iglesias(2.5 million), and just given it to prospect from the Dominican. We would’ve likely gotten back a player better than a barely top 30 prospect/low ceiling prospect. 

Remember, you can't just throw money at these impoverished 16 year olds.  You have to build a relationship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Wish we would’ve just taken the money we paid Iglesias(2.5 million), and just given it to prospect from the Dominican. We would’ve likely gotten back a player better than a barely top 30 prospect/low ceiling prospect. 

We didn’t have that option.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2020/12/iglesias-baltimore-was-special-for-me.html?fbclid=IwAR11KZvra2Wak7K5eaG66_9QAFDNSU0KEjrrXNGfe_VaIp7htEIEfZIyvZA
 

Interview with Jose post-trade. A good reminder that these guys are human, and moreover, an encouraging sign that he says he absolutely loved the atmosphere and culture Hyde et. al have created in the clubhouse. 
 

Best of luck to Jose! Seems like a cool dude. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/5/2020 at 4:42 PM, sportsfan8703 said:

Wish we would’ve just taken the money we paid Iglesias(2.5 million), and just given it to prospect from the Dominican. We would’ve likely gotten back a player better than a barely top 30 prospect/low ceiling prospect. 

I don't believe we have $2.5-$3.5 million left over in the international player pool. In other words, we're already putting that money into those players, which is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...