Jump to content

Orioles not likely to bid on Ha-Seong Kim


Roll Tide

Should the Orioles be in on Ha-Seong Kim?  

38 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the Orioles be in on Ha-Seong Kim?



Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I think some of the opposition to posting fees in the past was a failure to understand or care that posted players are under contract to foreign teams, and if you want that contract and player you have to pay for that value.  I don't know if the Orioles were philosophically opposed to compensating teams for the players they control, or if they just couldn't afford the players being offered.

Ohtani cost 22.3M to acquire.  I'm reasonably sure any team could afford that for a talent of his caliber.

Now I'm not suggesting that the O's could have realistically acquired Ohtani but it was disappointing that they didn't even bother to make an offer.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I think some of the opposition to posting fees in the past was a failure to understand or care that posted players are under contract to foreign teams, and if you want that contract and player you have to pay for that value.  I don't know if the Orioles were philosophically opposed to compensating teams for the players they control, or if they just couldn't afford the players being offered.

I think under the old rules the posting fee was the subject of a sealed bid and then the winner still had to pay the player pretty much a free agent price.   It was pretty expensive.   The new rules are more friendly to the signing team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Frobby said:

I think under the old rules the posting fee was the subject of a sealed bid and then the winner still had to pay the player pretty much a free agent price.   It was pretty expensive.   The new rules are more friendly to the signing team.  

Which means less friendly to the posting team.  Which lowers the incentives to post anyone.  Imagine a scenario where the Orioles wanted to post Trey Mancini so he could go sign with a rich Japanese or Korean team, and they changed to rules to limit how much the O's could get out of the process because the foreign league(s) didn't want to pay so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Ohtani cost 22.3M to acquire.  I'm reasonably sure any team could afford that for a talent of his caliber.

Now I'm not suggesting that the O's could have realistically acquired Ohtani but it was disappointing that they didn't even bother to make an offer.

If you know that your ceiling isn't competitive why make an offer?  So fans can say "oooh look, the O's pulled out Syd's confederate money again!"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/21/2020 at 12:23 PM, Can_of_corn said:

Right, like when they declined to participate in the Ohtani posting.

The Darvish posting.

The Tanaka posting.

The Ryu posting.

Wait, you believe this player belongs in the same group as these players?  I don't see that at all.  Other than playing professional baseball in a foreign country, there is really no comparison.  Whether or not the Orioles will ever consider participating in the posting system is an interesting question, but this isn't a case I would use to argue the point one way or the other.  If the Orioles have changed philosophy and plan on testing the waters on the posting system, they may well still have no interest in bidding on this particular player.  Just really not a good example to choose to prove your point, IMO.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Number5 said:

Wait, you believe this player belongs in the same group as these players?  I don't see that at all.  Other than playing professional baseball in a foreign country, there is really no comparison.  Whether or not the Orioles will ever consider participating in the posting system is an interesting question, but this isn't a case I would use to argue the point one way or the other.  If the Orioles have changed philosophy and plan on testing the waters on the posting system, they may well still have no interest in bidding on this particular player.  Just really not a good example to choose to prove your point, IMO.

I didn't say that.  Heck I haven't even said I would have bid on Kim.

What I was saying is that the O's don't participate in the posting system. 

I see no reason to assume they have changed their mind about it until they actually participate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I didn't say that.  Heck I haven't even said I would have bid on Kim.

What I was saying is that the O's don't participate in the posting system. 

I see no reason to assume they have changed their mind about it until they actually participate.

I see no reason to make an assumption either way.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
4 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

What was the posting fee?  Has that been announced yet?

Yes

 

Quote

DEC. 31, 6:06pm: The Padres have announced Kim’s signing. His deal includes a mutual option for 2025. The option could increase the value to $39MM, Jeeho Yoo of Yonhap News reports. Yoo adds that the Heroes will receive $5.25MM as the posting fee.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Posting fee of 5.25M.

Higher than I would have gone.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2020/12/padres-sign-ha-seong-kim.html

I don’t get it! This isn’t a lot of money for a player that is developed and ready to produce at the MLB level. The Orioles paid a combined  3.5 million dollars for Baumer and Mayo in bonuses. Both players need to be developed and likely reach the majors is 3 or 4 years best case scenario. Possibly never reaching or making a major impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I don’t get it! This isn’t a lot of money for a player that is developed and ready to produce at the MLB level. The Orioles paid a combined  3.5 million dollars for Baumer and Mayo in bonuses. Both players need to be developed and likely reach the majors is 3 or 4 years best case scenario. Possibly never reaching or making a major impact.

Because of the.last history of former KBO players.  Drungo gave us the numbers.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I don’t get it! This isn’t a lot of money for a player that is developed and ready to produce at the MLB level. The Orioles paid a combined  3.5 million dollars for Baumer and Mayo in bonuses. Both players need to be developed and likely reach the majors is 3 or 4 years best case scenario. Possibly never reaching or making a major impact.

Ok. That’s 1/10 the total money for two guys who could also be better than him. They could be nothing, sure, but the KBO is roughly AA quality. Not exactly a sure thing. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I don’t get it! This isn’t a lot of money for a player that is developed and ready to produce at the MLB level. The Orioles paid a combined  3.5 million dollars for Baumer and Mayo in bonuses. Both players need to be developed and likely reach the majors is 3 or 4 years best case scenario. Possibly never reaching or making a major impact.

Ready to produce at the MLB level?  Maybe,  maybe not.   Padres took a gamble here,  not one the Os should have considered at that price. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • WBALs Blair Young likes our chances https://www.wbaltv.com/article/do-orioles-have-chance-sign-free-agent-pitcher-corbin-burnes/62512129
    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...