Jump to content

The most baffling disappointment so far for me is...


interloper

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, interloper said:

Might have missed it, but did anyone suggest that? I certainly like Armstrong more than Sulser, but at some point he needs to get results. Fry was able to get back on track a bit at least, now we need to see it from Sean. 

No one suggested it but those are the arms due up next and they aren’t BP arms right now.

If you are going to totally overreact to a SSS, I would think you (not you you but general you) have a plan as to how to replace him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I'm guessing that's some point after he's pitched three innings this year?

Sort of depends how high you were on Armstrong to begin with.  He has a 4.40 career ERA, 5.05 as an Oriole.   He was pretty bad for us in 2019, then quite good in an abbreviated 2020 season in which he missed about a month.   Sulser has a 3.94 career ERA, 5.11 as an Oriole, and pitched part of last year with a broken foot, following which his performance declined significantly.    He’s a year older than Armstrong.    Honestly I couldn’t tell you which of the two is likely to have the better career from here.    Either way you’re talking about a middle reliever with somewhat limited upside IMO.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I'm guessing that's some point after he's pitched three innings this year?

He has a bad ERA/xFIP if you A.) Control for his career B.) Control since becoming an Oriole C.) Control for since 2020.

Only reason he will get patience is because he's a lefty that flashed some skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

I would not have put Armstrong in that situation either, but I am not going to blame his subsequent outings on that one.   

If you look at Armstrong’s history, his bad outings tend to come in streaks.  We acquired him two years ago because he’d managed a 14.73 ERA in four outings before Seattle dropped him.   Hopefully he will right the ship.  
 

Came here to same thing, Armstrong generally has been streaky. Overall, he's been a below-average bullpen arm throughout his career. At age 30, I'm not expecting much more than that from him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get why people think Armstrong is just a dime a dozen guy.  He is "old", has very little ML track record and could potentially be easily replaced.  I disagree with that somewhat.

I have mentioned this before but Armstrong was a pretty stellar minor league pitcher.  He appeared in 302 games in the minors (1 start) and covered 350 IP.  His career ERA was 2.26 and its not like he didn't perform well at each level at the proper ages either.  In those 350 IP, he struck out 478 batters (12.2 K rate) and gave up only 13 homers.  He also only gave up 254 hits.  Hitters only batted 203 vs him in the minors.  His issue was his walk rate.  His BB rate was 4.42 in the minors.(more on this later)

In the majors, he only has 133 IP.   As Frobby mentioned, his ERA is 4.40, which is obviously nothing special.  What isn't mentioned there is how small of a sample size this is being based off of and how a few bad outings can really skew the stats.  Take, for example, 3 outings in 2019.  He pitched 3.2 innings and gave up 11 runs in 3 appearances.  Take those away and all of a sudden, his career ERA is 3.76.  Now I admit, that is cherry picking things but again, it speaks to his SSS.  2019 also saw him have a 348 BABIP, which is pretty unlucky.  Throughout his career, he misses bats at an above league average rate and he throws strikes at a league average rate.  His BB rate, which plagued him in the minors, is better but still not great.  It is 3.7, which wouldn't be bad if his K rate was more in the 10-11 range as opposed to 9.  

I think, based on the combo of a very good MiL career, his stuff and how he misses bats that Armstrong can be a good reliever.  I think just writing him off is completely foolish.  He may never be anything but to act like there is no reason to think he will is just wrong and quite frankly, a very lazy opinion.

There is a reason he has never been given a great opportunity, there is no denying that.  Sometimes its simply you are in the wrong place at the wrong time.  Sometimes its because of you.  Whatever the circumstances have been, despite his MiL accomplishments, he hasn't been able to stand out in the big leagues.  The Orioles should give him every chance to do that right now.  There is no one knocking on the door for his spot and while he isn't young, his arm is and he could pitch for a lot of years.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I get why people think Armstrong is just a dime a dozen guy.  He is "old", has very little ML track record and could potentially be easily replaced.  I disagree with that somewhat.

I have mentioned this before but Armstrong was a pretty stellar minor league pitcher.  He appeared in 302 games in the minors (1 start) and covered 350 IP.  His career ERA was 2.26 and its not like he didn't perform well at each level at the proper ages either.  In those 350 IP, he struck out 478 batters (12.2 K rate) and gave up only 13 homers.  He also only gave up 254 hits.  Hitters only batted 203 vs him in the minors.  His issue was his walk rate.  His BB rate was 4.42 in the minors.(more on this later)

In the majors, he only has 133 IP.   As Frobby mentioned, his ERA is 4.40, which is obviously nothing special.  What isn't mentioned there is how small of a sample size this is being based off of and how a few bad outings can really skew the stats.  Take, for example, 3 outings in 2019.  He pitched 3.2 innings and gave up 11 runs in 3 appearances.  Take those away and all of a sudden, his career ERA is 3.76.  Now I admit, that is cherry picking things but again, it speaks to his SSS.  2019 also saw him have a 348 BABIP, which is pretty unlucky.  Throughout his career, he misses bats at an above league average rate and he throws strikes at a league average rate.  His BB rate, which plagued him in the minors, is better but still not great.  It is 3.7, which wouldn't be bad if his K rate was more in the 10-11 range as opposed to 9.  

I think, based on the combo of a very good MiL career, his stuff and how he misses bats that Armstrong can be a good reliever.  I think just writing him off is completely foolish.  He may never be anything but to act like there is no reason to think he will is just wrong and quite frankly, a very lazy opinion.

There is a reason he has never been given a great opportunity, there is no denying that.  Sometimes its simply you are in the wrong place at the wrong time.  Sometimes its because of you.  Whatever the circumstances have been, despite his MiL accomplishments, he hasn't been able to stand out in the big leagues.  The Orioles should give him every chance to do that right now.  There is no one knocking on the door for his spot and while he isn't young, his arm is and he could pitch for a lot of years.  

Somehow Armstrong got into your heart.  And you have stood up for him many times as you do now.   Its good to see.  

I don't know how this will turn out for him.  It could go either way.  But he has one fan leading the cheers.  That can not be a bad thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...