Jump to content

Robert Neustrom 2021


Hazmat

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Great piece.   I saw Steve tease it in the comments of his yesterday post - he seemed (at least yesterday) to stay engaged with his readers much of the day.

i just don't know about Neustrom reviewing his swing decisions a couple hours after the game.   I sort of thought the Decision of Sleep Science might want REM mode by then, and look at it with a fresh brain at 0700.    

Think in video I heard Neustrom say precisely November 20 as when he would have to know 40-man status.   I am still fuzzy on what comes first between CBA expiration and Clubs needing to lock 40-man rosters for 2022 Rule V draft.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/14/2021 at 2:25 PM, LookinUp said:

Definitely seems like a guy that can start at Norfolk to show if he's really made a break out. Would be awesome. No way I'd be exposing him to Rule V.

Agree, he's a lock for my 40-man. Stewart coming off surgery, Santander and Hays injury-prone, McKenna a great defender but a 0 with the bat so far, Stowers not likely to break with the club. The squad will definitely need another outfielder to throw out there and Neustrom is my next-man-up choice right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, interloper said:

Agree, he's a lock for my 40-man. Stewart coming off surgery, Santander and Hays injury-prone, McKenna a great defender but a 0 with the bat so far, Stowers not likely to break with the club. The squad will definitely need another outfielder to throw out there and Neustrom is my next-man-up choice right now. 

Reports are that Stewart should be ready for ST.   That will allow Neustrom to begin 2022 in AAA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Stewart.

I have to agree completely. He will be 28 next month. He has not done anything to keep his 40 man spot over several younger guys with actual upside. Stewart was supposed to have some OBP, which he does because he walks. BA does not mean very much these days, but his line for his career is .214/,329/.403/.732. How much longer are we supposed to give him? His K% in 2020 was 33.9, which was slightly improved in 2021 at 28%. He had a 94 WRC in 2021 as opposed to a very respectable 123 in 2020, albeit a SSS and propped up by a hot 10 days. He is a terrible OF, evidenced by his -9 DRS in 2021, according to Fangraphs.

He plays a power position in corner OF, but provides very little power. I would rather play McKenna out there, even Nevin, over Stewart, until Stowers and Neustrom are ready. I cannot justify keeping him on the 40 man with so many younger prospects that could be claimed in the R5. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will not disagree with the assessment of Stewart's mediocrity.   The question of what keeps him on the 40 man roster is that is cheap, optionable and that Stowers and Neustrom still need some time in the  minors.    That time could be as little as a couple of months of the 2022 season.  

Elias could replace Stewart with someone off the waiver wire.  That is certainly possible.  However, I do see the need for an outfielder that can step in if Hays and/or Santander are hurt early in the season.   McKenna concerns me with his bat.   A pitcher with a good fastball will take around three pitches to send McKenna bat to the bench.   He is good on defense but I have no faith in his offense.  Nevin has not shown he can even hit AAA pitching.

So whether it is Stewart or someone else I see a need for a backup outfielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I will not disagree with the assessment of Stewart's mediocrity.   The question of what keeps him on the 40 man roster is that is cheap, optionable and that Stowers and Neustrom still need some time in the  minors.    That time could be as little as a couple of months of the 2022 season.  

Elias could replace Stewart with someone off the waiver wire.  That is certainly possible.  However, I do see the need for an outfielder that can step in if Hays and/or Santander are hurt early in the season.   McKenna concerns me with his bat.   A pitcher with a good fastball will take around three pitches to send McKenna bat to the bench.   He is good on defense but I have no faith in his offense.  Nevin has not shown he can even hit AAA pitching.

So whether it is Stewart or someone else I see a need for a backup outfielder.

I agree with you about McKenna, especially offensively. But if you compare him to Stewart, at least McKenna has speed and defensive ability. Stewart has neither. McKenna can be used as a late inning defensive replacement, and as a pinch runner. Stewart can't be. So even with his limited offensive contributions, McKenna should be kept instead of Stewart. If the need should arise for a fifth outfielder, Mateo could be at least a short-term solution.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, panick said:

I agree with you about McKenna, especially offensively. But if you compare him to Stewart, at least McKenna has speed and defensive ability. Stewart has neither. McKenna can be used as a late inning defensive replacement, and as a pinch runner. Stewart can't be. So even with his limited offensive contributions, McKenna should be kept instead of Stewart. If the need should arise for a fifth outfielder, Mateo could be at least a short-term solution.

I have no problem with McKenna as a backup defensive outfielder.  Just don't expect much from his offense if Hays or Santander are injured.   The O's need to give Mateo  playing time at SS/2B to see what he can offer.   The infield is thin even if they add a Galvis or someone similar.  Mateo is fast and he can run around the outfield but I think the infield is his future if he can take advantage of the opportunity given him.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I will not disagree with the assessment of Stewart's mediocrity.   The question of what keeps him on the 40 man roster is that is cheap, optionable and that Stowers and Neustrom still need some time in the  minors.    That time could be as little as a couple of months of the 2022 season.  

Elias could replace Stewart with someone off the waiver wire.  That is certainly possible.  However, I do see the need for an outfielder that can step in if Hays and/or Santander are hurt early in the season.   McKenna concerns me with his bat.   A pitcher with a good fastball will take around three pitches to send McKenna bat to the bench.   He is good on defense but I have no faith in his offense.  Nevin has not shown he can even hit AAA pitching.

So whether it is Stewart or someone else I see a need for a backup outfielder.

For me, the 40 man spot is the issue. Obviously, there are many moving parts. Do they keep Mancini and Santander? If they are traded or non-tendered, then perhaps they keep Stewart for the time being as a DH. That is the only way I can see him staying. Being a LH hitter, on a team that is heavily RH helps him. Even with all that, the OF talent has him on the outside looking in.

McKenna hit really well in AAA, and we need to find out if that has any merit. Playing everyday would allow us to find out. Nevin might be a guy who fills a gap instead of Stewart, but again, like you said, he did not hit well in AAA. But there was progress there. Tyler has to get stronger, but if Mancini is moved I can see him on the roster because of his defensive flexibility. Jahmai Jones may end up playing some OF as well.

It is too bad, but I think DJ does not deserve to have a chair when the music stops, unless Mike Elias makes trades/moves from the OF depth. He might be a mediocre bench hitter (replacement level), with no defensive value on another roster. In Baltimore, he is simply surrounded by players better, or project better, than him and they are pushing him aside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, wildcard said:

I will not disagree with the assessment of Stewart's mediocrity.   The question of what keeps him on the 40 man roster is that is cheap, optionable and that Stowers and Neustrom still need some time in the  minors.    That time could be as little as a couple of months of the 2022 season.  

Elias could replace Stewart with someone off the waiver wire.  That is certainly possible.  However, I do see the need for an outfielder that can step in if Hays and/or Santander are hurt early in the season.   McKenna concerns me with his bat.   A pitcher with a good fastball will take around three pitches to send McKenna bat to the bench.   He is good on defense but I have no faith in his offense.  Nevin has not shown he can even hit AAA pitching.

So whether it is Stewart or someone else I see a need for a backup outfielder.

My sense is that Neustrom will be a very similar player to Stewart.   Not sure he’s an upgrade at all but arguably it might be worthwhile to find out anyway, since Stewart has looked like a replacement level player in 193 games, 609 PA.   He could improve a bit offensively but he’s always going to be pretty limited in what he can do.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...